When I read Steve Kirsch's text "Kirsch's premise — "You simply cannot have an 1100% increase in disease and only an 84% increase in all-cause mortality. That’s impossible because diseases cause about 90% of the deaths " I suddenly knew, he lacks logical thinking skill.
So, I COMPLETELY MISSED this writing on your Substack & happened upon it today…. I’m definitely not going to brag about my pathetic math skills but, THEY ARE PATHETIC. I am completely confused…Should we ethically doubt Todd Callender? Or is it that, his numbers are simply incorrectly computed? 🤷♀️🤷♀️
The guy Calendar is speaking of his personal experience as an insurance agent. That won't necessarily: "add up". It's just the patch that he encountered in his work.
It looks like the source for the 84% increase in mortality among the millennial group aged 25-44 is not Todd Calendar. Edward Dowd, at around 2:30 of this rumble video interview by Steve Bannon states it.
Don’t dismiss the idea that the jabs can cause accidents. Car accidents, falls, etc due to undetected strokes. See Marc Crispin Miller’s frequent Substacks.
I posted previous comment defending Todd, but realized it's not about preferences or believes here but the numbers. So number 1, why should I believe any number CDC is saying?? Todd numbers were not presented here, so the claim he is misinformation spreader is wrong. The 1100% increase in diseases, might relate to CHRONIC diseases, where people do not die (yet, but easy achievable with 5G), but simply suffer. Also there is something called 'TIME FACTOR' when considering a disease and following death, cancer takes more time to develop, for example. Cancer is being admitted by Dr. Cole and others, to blow out of proportions right now, after the GENE THERAPIES, and we agree all on that. Just found out from a friend, another 50 years old had to go to emergency because of 'fast developing breast cancer'! 5 months after the single J&J jab!
Ed Dawd knows a lot about good statistics in terms of insurances increase in deaths numbers which were ~40%, which is already huge anyway. Similar numbers are coming from EU.
Todd is dealing with MILITARY inuries/deaths data, which is possibly very different than public, only Pfizer and Mod_E-RNA know what really was injected into every human being, and if 'they' wanted to target military, which the criminal mandate does, one should not speculate but look into the real numbers.
It is very pity that those who are on the same side, fight with each other. That weakens the entire pool, and the enemy is happy to see that. Division and mind programming, as always, thank you Kissinger/IBM/Gates & Co.!
Btw. while listening to Steve's presentation at acu2020 today (fri 3rd of June '22) I have just one question: can you proof that the covid GENE THERAPY saved one single human being from dying of 'covid'???? I can't find it for some reason...
Given that the vaccines destroy the immune system, AND the jabs contain CANCER CELLS, it makes sense the cancer rates are skyrocketing. And heart disease is killing less than cancer.
But ACTUALLY, since BOTH are caused by the vaccines, we should be saying "VACCINES aare killing millions!" with the exact mechanisms being a secondary discussion.
We're playing the enemy's game when we nit-pick each other in our ferocious attempts to discredit those who are only trying to blow the warning alarms. If we find that a whisleblower doesn't have every detail of his report perfectly correct, our position should be to just keep repeating that which we know is true, (leaving the other stuff out) and march forward.
It's NOT as if they rest of our evidence is DEPENDANT upon the exact details of the exact all-cause mortality rates others are reporting, and/or whether or not cancer or heart disease is the leading "cause". The leading CAUSE (of health injury & death) is VACCINE exposure, and the myriad conditions CAUSE BY vaccine exposures are a 2ndary discussion which is now getting lost by these trivial arguments.
The enemy LOVES seeing us rip each other to shreds over the details.
There are so many variables to account for when looking at disease. Where were these people before COVID, lockdowns and vaccines? Stress induced? Pre-existing conditions such as undiagnosed heart disease or diabetes made worse by no or limited exercise, fresh air or sunlight for an extended amount of time during lockdowns. Combine that with untested, unproven mRNA reprogramming shots. There needs to be a brain-storming of the minds who are willing to look at all of the data available ... not a consensus, but unbiased(if that is possible) look. It needs to cover all of the data available so far. How many different mRNA formulas were used to include different ingredients, comparing lot number and types of engineered viral material. I am guessing 2-3 months of analyzing would give us a much clearer picture.
Could this have anything to do with the purported increases in cancer? Although I'm not sure the amount and strength that actually reaches the earth's surface is meaningful.
The American Astronomical Society - Supplement Series
Variations of the Galactic Cosmic Rays in the Recent Solar Cycles
In this paper, we study the Galactic cosmic-ray (GCR) variations over the solar cycles 23 and 24, with measurements from NASA's Advanced Composition Explorer/Cosmic Ray Isotope Spectrometer instrument and the ground-based neutron monitors (NMs). The results show that the maximum GCR intensities of heavy nuclei (5 ≤ Z ≤ 28, 50∼500 MeV nuc−1) at 1 au during the solar minimum in 2019–2020 break their previous records, exceeding those recorded in 1997 and 2009 by ∼25% and ∼6%, respectively, and are at the highest levels since the space age. However, the peak NM count rates are lower than those in late 2009. The difference between GCR intensities and NM count rates still remains to be explained. Furthermore, we find that the GCR modulation environment during the solar minimum P24/25 are significantly different from previous solar minima in several aspects, including remarkably low sunspot numbers, extremely low inclination of the heliospheric current sheet, rare coronal mass ejections, weak interplanetary magnetic field and turbulence. These changes are conducive to reduce the level of solar modulation, providing a plausible explanation for the record-breaking GCR intensities in interplanetary space.
When I read Steve Kirsch's text "Kirsch's premise — "You simply cannot have an 1100% increase in disease and only an 84% increase in all-cause mortality. That’s impossible because diseases cause about 90% of the deaths " I suddenly knew, he lacks logical thinking skill.
Thank you again Steve Kirsch for looking out for us!
So, I COMPLETELY MISSED this writing on your Substack & happened upon it today…. I’m definitely not going to brag about my pathetic math skills but, THEY ARE PATHETIC. I am completely confused…Should we ethically doubt Todd Callender? Or is it that, his numbers are simply incorrectly computed? 🤷♀️🤷♀️
It all makes sense since we know the Covid Vaccines suppress the body's natural immune system, among other things.
The guy Calendar is speaking of his personal experience as an insurance agent. That won't necessarily: "add up". It's just the patch that he encountered in his work.
It looks like the source for the 84% increase in mortality among the millennial group aged 25-44 is not Todd Calendar. Edward Dowd, at around 2:30 of this rumble video interview by Steve Bannon states it.
https://rumble.com/vx0yfb-edward-dowd-on-future-recession-shocking-findings-in-the-cdc-covid-data-and.html
Don’t dismiss the idea that the jabs can cause accidents. Car accidents, falls, etc due to undetected strokes. See Marc Crispin Miller’s frequent Substacks.
I posted previous comment defending Todd, but realized it's not about preferences or believes here but the numbers. So number 1, why should I believe any number CDC is saying?? Todd numbers were not presented here, so the claim he is misinformation spreader is wrong. The 1100% increase in diseases, might relate to CHRONIC diseases, where people do not die (yet, but easy achievable with 5G), but simply suffer. Also there is something called 'TIME FACTOR' when considering a disease and following death, cancer takes more time to develop, for example. Cancer is being admitted by Dr. Cole and others, to blow out of proportions right now, after the GENE THERAPIES, and we agree all on that. Just found out from a friend, another 50 years old had to go to emergency because of 'fast developing breast cancer'! 5 months after the single J&J jab!
Ed Dawd knows a lot about good statistics in terms of insurances increase in deaths numbers which were ~40%, which is already huge anyway. Similar numbers are coming from EU.
Todd is dealing with MILITARY inuries/deaths data, which is possibly very different than public, only Pfizer and Mod_E-RNA know what really was injected into every human being, and if 'they' wanted to target military, which the criminal mandate does, one should not speculate but look into the real numbers.
It is very pity that those who are on the same side, fight with each other. That weakens the entire pool, and the enemy is happy to see that. Division and mind programming, as always, thank you Kissinger/IBM/Gates & Co.!
Btw. while listening to Steve's presentation at acu2020 today (fri 3rd of June '22) I have just one question: can you proof that the covid GENE THERAPY saved one single human being from dying of 'covid'???? I can't find it for some reason...
Given that the vaccines destroy the immune system, AND the jabs contain CANCER CELLS, it makes sense the cancer rates are skyrocketing. And heart disease is killing less than cancer.
But ACTUALLY, since BOTH are caused by the vaccines, we should be saying "VACCINES aare killing millions!" with the exact mechanisms being a secondary discussion.
We're playing the enemy's game when we nit-pick each other in our ferocious attempts to discredit those who are only trying to blow the warning alarms. If we find that a whisleblower doesn't have every detail of his report perfectly correct, our position should be to just keep repeating that which we know is true, (leaving the other stuff out) and march forward.
It's NOT as if they rest of our evidence is DEPENDANT upon the exact details of the exact all-cause mortality rates others are reporting, and/or whether or not cancer or heart disease is the leading "cause". The leading CAUSE (of health injury & death) is VACCINE exposure, and the myriad conditions CAUSE BY vaccine exposures are a 2ndary discussion which is now getting lost by these trivial arguments.
The enemy LOVES seeing us rip each other to shreds over the details.
Have you seen this yet?
https://notaakhirzaman.com/10355/
Why is Covid a pandemic if heart and cancer death rates are higher but heart and cancer is not listed as a pandemic.
There are so many variables to account for when looking at disease. Where were these people before COVID, lockdowns and vaccines? Stress induced? Pre-existing conditions such as undiagnosed heart disease or diabetes made worse by no or limited exercise, fresh air or sunlight for an extended amount of time during lockdowns. Combine that with untested, unproven mRNA reprogramming shots. There needs to be a brain-storming of the minds who are willing to look at all of the data available ... not a consensus, but unbiased(if that is possible) look. It needs to cover all of the data available so far. How many different mRNA formulas were used to include different ingredients, comparing lot number and types of engineered viral material. I am guessing 2-3 months of analyzing would give us a much clearer picture.
Could this have anything to do with the purported increases in cancer? Although I'm not sure the amount and strength that actually reaches the earth's surface is meaningful.
The American Astronomical Society - Supplement Series
Variations of the Galactic Cosmic Rays in the Recent Solar Cycles
Published June 9, 2021
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4365/abf936
In this paper, we study the Galactic cosmic-ray (GCR) variations over the solar cycles 23 and 24, with measurements from NASA's Advanced Composition Explorer/Cosmic Ray Isotope Spectrometer instrument and the ground-based neutron monitors (NMs). The results show that the maximum GCR intensities of heavy nuclei (5 ≤ Z ≤ 28, 50∼500 MeV nuc−1) at 1 au during the solar minimum in 2019–2020 break their previous records, exceeding those recorded in 1997 and 2009 by ∼25% and ∼6%, respectively, and are at the highest levels since the space age. However, the peak NM count rates are lower than those in late 2009. The difference between GCR intensities and NM count rates still remains to be explained. Furthermore, we find that the GCR modulation environment during the solar minimum P24/25 are significantly different from previous solar minima in several aspects, including remarkably low sunspot numbers, extremely low inclination of the heliospheric current sheet, rare coronal mass ejections, weak interplanetary magnetic field and turbulence. These changes are conducive to reduce the level of solar modulation, providing a plausible explanation for the record-breaking GCR intensities in interplanetary space.
Excellent.
If most morbidity is not immediately lethal, wouldn’t there be a lag in deaths? These figures could then work?
https://rumble.com/v12npss-take-five-special-guests-todd-callender-esq.-and-dr.-lee-vliet-4-26-2022.html