Conclusion: "The Ontario data show that vaccination currently makes little difference in terms of hospitalization and death rates for those below age 60."
I appreciate this report because it opposes the narrative demanding that we all get "vaccinated."
However, I'd argue that it's partly incorrect: statistically one is /more/ likely to be hospitalized with, and die from covid if they are jabbed. The so-called "vaccines" impair the body's natural immune system.
Thanks for posting the report to the Cdn member of parliament. It is good as far as it goes, but it still leaves individuals over 60 years of age "EXPOSED" to the "vaccine narrative". Indeed, I believe the report, although good, is flawed in at least four respects, namely: (1) it doesn’t take a deep enough dive into vaccine injury and death, (2) to the extent it implicitly relies on pharmacovigilance databases at all, it doesn't take into account the URF multiplier effect to be applied to pharmacovigilance databases, including in relation to people over 60 (i.e., that you are so often on about, quite rightly), (3) it doesn’t take into account emergent concerns about excess mortality occurring after vaccination which represents deaths not likely to be reflected in VAERS or to be covered by virtue of VAERS adjustment factors, and (4) as long as he/she is trying to influence government policy, he does not deal with early treatment as an alternative to vaccination, including for individuals over 60.
On point (1) in particular, there is a reference to the hokey Cdn vaccine injury system (which is far worse than the passive VAERS system and that's saying a lot). Indeed, the author even recommends that the reader (i.e., the Canadian MP!) look to other pharmacovigilance databases outside Canada "to obtain a more comprehensive picture for adverse events with current COVID-19 vaccines". Moreover, the questions posed and answered in the report on vaccine adverse events (namely questions 8-10) are perfunctory at best and fail to present a proper picture of the vast array of serious vaccine harm, especially for individuals over 60. You have covered these categories of harm relentlessly in your substack.
In effect, the author is inviting the reader (i.e., the Canadian MP) to do his/her own investigation of vaccine injury/death and to derive his/her own harm/benefit analysis, when the author should be doing this in his report, by better analyzing reported vaccine harms and considering excess mortality. There is simply not sufficient analysis of vaccine death and injury, and no proper harm/benefit analysis for individuals over 60 set out in this report. In short, as you well know and often repeat, it is not enough to look only at reduced levels of COVID-related death and hospitalization for individuals over 60 as the sole rationale for taking the vaccines. You must also look at non-COVID mortality and severe morbidity outside COVID, including vaccine injury and excess mortality. I see this criticism as a very serious flaw in this report, i.e., the failure to properly investigate non-COVID death and injury, including vaccine injury in any meaningful way.
My concern is that the report leaves people over 60 (not to mention the member of Canadian Parliament) with the distinct impression that people over 60 should continue taking the vaccines because the vaccines may reduce COVID hospitalization and death. But it does little to tell them about the potential short- and long- term effects of taking repeated boosters aside from any reduction in COVID death that may exist. Again, as you have continually called for, where's the harm-benefit analysis here, ala Fraiman/P. Doshi.
So I am a little disappointed in the report, quite frankly, in that it will be given by the member of the Canadian Parliament to his house leader and ultimately to Trudeau, and will leave people 60+ in the hands of leaders improperly informed. In short, it fails to properly assist those individuals over 60 by getting into a proper harm/benefit analysis, so desperately needed.
What I don't understand is how can anyone that has their brain functioning at even a 3 year old level can think this injection is not destructive and harmful to any man or woman 60 years and up .
I love peoples comments and those who get trapped. They call this report BS. Dsmith we will give you the spotlight here. You can take this report personally to your Liberal MP in your area and ask them to read it in the HOC for comment and then the opposition being the Conservatives can discuss it. NDP can also ask questions. DSmith your not afraid to take it to your MP. are you? Also take it to your liberal rep in your province. You didnt comment on that poster who told you to do it so I thought we can put it at the top for more attention. This is a challenge. You afraid of the truth?
Artificial intelligence is real. I am a victim of it stalked and harassed. Psychos live among us, Coward weak men interested in power and control. The arrivecan app a steppng stone to digital id they will push as so beneficial. No it is not. An extra few minutes at customs is worth it. Covid has opened eyes to AI that I have known for years. You think experiments havent been occurring by evil people. Think again. They have. Evilness knows no bounds. The fact Trudeau gets away with inciting hatred and division should show you how little they respect the rule of law. This is from a citizen with a story. Story of corruption by those your police forces do nothing about. Those who try are harassed abused by their own police and charged. The cowards who walk among us. Crimes in government are massive. Crimes by police the same who protect those criminals in government. Who supllies the cocaine and fentanyl and heroin to safe injection sites. The same ones who move drugs and hook the victims on the drugs in the first place, In bed with hells angels and other organized crime. Shutting down investigations by telling cops you can get killed if you keep investigating. Can you imagine that. Trudeau online twitter saying he will fight online terrorists and extremists. Did you have a mirror with you Trudeau to admire yourself.
Oh really what about your domestic terrorists desigrating Queen Elizabeth statutes and others during BLM riots.or those who fiire bombed CN Rail in blockades. Do you mean those ones you protect. You lied Trudeau to Canadians you actually protect the real terrorists and criminals not law abiding Canadians you abused and terrorized during covid and with vaccine mandates. Not the half million and rising law abiding peaceful citizens on TrudeauMustGo who are not Russian bots. Real everyday people. People injured by the vaccines. Pregnant females who chose to protect their unborn child and parents who protected their children who were segregated cruelly and unjustly and evilly. Hard working everyday Canadians including police officers and army. All with one common theme. Expressing their feelings. Not robots. Real people with real emotions. You lost Trudeau with your disrespect to Canadians who pay your salary as you mock Canadians with no accountability.
Trudeau is a criminal and a traitor. He has abused emergency powers to illegaly violate constitutional rights. He has targeted dissenters for persecution and censorship. He has fermented hate amongst the population. He has conspired with foriegners to cause much harm and despair to Canadians. He has coerced millions to take an unnecesary and potentially harmful medical injection under threat of job loss and freedom of movement.
🇨🇦 PM Turdeau 💩 (AKA Blackface) finally - after enough polpulace aggravation, travel delays and business/tourism losses - caved in to drop the infamous ArriveCan vax passport. This apparently came in on the heels of an announcement by a newly minted opposition leader's pledge to abolish it for good on day 1.
Is there some other other country still doing a Vax pass other than those dimwits?
This goes nicely with NEJM and John Hopkins studies that natural immunity is being destroyed from these vaxxes in young adults but it doesnt matter even under 60 it is the same. In Ontario Canada they put the survivor rate from covid and under 60 there was not much difference between different age groups especially when seeing vents and remdesivir was being uttiized improperly and killing.. This is sad because both adults and children have always gotten colds and they handle them no differently. Same symptoms and length of symptoms as well. The truth is being muddied with too much over analyzing. The vaccines are not good period and another 2 healthy young doctors died suddenly in Canada. 3 doctors in the last couple of months from McMaster in Hamilton Ontario. Knock Knock is there any doctors with working brain cells free of fear and brainwashing out there to figure out its no coincidence. There is a common thread here. Its disgusting when the City of Toronto puts out an ad and essentially it was attacking unvaccinated chilldren. Check out Joe Warrmington on twitter from the Toronto Sun who wrote a email to the City of Toronto demanding an explanation of why vaccinated children were being put as superior to unvaccinated children and unvaccinated children should not play outside. Go see tbe video ad pushing vaccines and be horrified and shocked at disgusting dehumanizing people in Ontario and Canada. A real disgrace to humanity based on this report and other studies and Denmark stopping the vaccines to children. Lawsuits cant come quick enough.
Bombshell study, but of course no word about it on the msm, and Canada is going on with their draconian COVID restrictions and vax mandates. Unreal, how many countries and officials are still pushing the fairytale of a safe and effective RNA vax, although all facts are disputing that notion.
My apologies it's Dr. Trozzi not troxxi!
Well i'm almost 80 and sure as hell i'll never take their fn jab!
I appreciate this report because it opposes the narrative demanding that we all get "vaccinated."
However, I'd argue that it's partly incorrect: statistically one is /more/ likely to be hospitalized with, and die from covid if they are jabbed. The so-called "vaccines" impair the body's natural immune system.
Steve,
Thanks for posting the report to the Cdn member of parliament. It is good as far as it goes, but it still leaves individuals over 60 years of age "EXPOSED" to the "vaccine narrative". Indeed, I believe the report, although good, is flawed in at least four respects, namely: (1) it doesn’t take a deep enough dive into vaccine injury and death, (2) to the extent it implicitly relies on pharmacovigilance databases at all, it doesn't take into account the URF multiplier effect to be applied to pharmacovigilance databases, including in relation to people over 60 (i.e., that you are so often on about, quite rightly), (3) it doesn’t take into account emergent concerns about excess mortality occurring after vaccination which represents deaths not likely to be reflected in VAERS or to be covered by virtue of VAERS adjustment factors, and (4) as long as he/she is trying to influence government policy, he does not deal with early treatment as an alternative to vaccination, including for individuals over 60.
On point (1) in particular, there is a reference to the hokey Cdn vaccine injury system (which is far worse than the passive VAERS system and that's saying a lot). Indeed, the author even recommends that the reader (i.e., the Canadian MP!) look to other pharmacovigilance databases outside Canada "to obtain a more comprehensive picture for adverse events with current COVID-19 vaccines". Moreover, the questions posed and answered in the report on vaccine adverse events (namely questions 8-10) are perfunctory at best and fail to present a proper picture of the vast array of serious vaccine harm, especially for individuals over 60. You have covered these categories of harm relentlessly in your substack.
In effect, the author is inviting the reader (i.e., the Canadian MP) to do his/her own investigation of vaccine injury/death and to derive his/her own harm/benefit analysis, when the author should be doing this in his report, by better analyzing reported vaccine harms and considering excess mortality. There is simply not sufficient analysis of vaccine death and injury, and no proper harm/benefit analysis for individuals over 60 set out in this report. In short, as you well know and often repeat, it is not enough to look only at reduced levels of COVID-related death and hospitalization for individuals over 60 as the sole rationale for taking the vaccines. You must also look at non-COVID mortality and severe morbidity outside COVID, including vaccine injury and excess mortality. I see this criticism as a very serious flaw in this report, i.e., the failure to properly investigate non-COVID death and injury, including vaccine injury in any meaningful way.
My concern is that the report leaves people over 60 (not to mention the member of Canadian Parliament) with the distinct impression that people over 60 should continue taking the vaccines because the vaccines may reduce COVID hospitalization and death. But it does little to tell them about the potential short- and long- term effects of taking repeated boosters aside from any reduction in COVID death that may exist. Again, as you have continually called for, where's the harm-benefit analysis here, ala Fraiman/P. Doshi.
So I am a little disappointed in the report, quite frankly, in that it will be given by the member of the Canadian Parliament to his house leader and ultimately to Trudeau, and will leave people 60+ in the hands of leaders improperly informed. In short, it fails to properly assist those individuals over 60 by getting into a proper harm/benefit analysis, so desperately needed.
What I don't understand is how can anyone that has their brain functioning at even a 3 year old level can think this injection is not destructive and harmful to any man or woman 60 years and up .
More conspiracy....
I love peoples comments and those who get trapped. They call this report BS. Dsmith we will give you the spotlight here. You can take this report personally to your Liberal MP in your area and ask them to read it in the HOC for comment and then the opposition being the Conservatives can discuss it. NDP can also ask questions. DSmith your not afraid to take it to your MP. are you? Also take it to your liberal rep in your province. You didnt comment on that poster who told you to do it so I thought we can put it at the top for more attention. This is a challenge. You afraid of the truth?
When will the Liberal Party comment on this report. Has any one went to their MP to ask them to bring this report up in the HOC so the LPC answers .
We'll find him! Mick.
Artificial intelligence is real. I am a victim of it stalked and harassed. Psychos live among us, Coward weak men interested in power and control. The arrivecan app a steppng stone to digital id they will push as so beneficial. No it is not. An extra few minutes at customs is worth it. Covid has opened eyes to AI that I have known for years. You think experiments havent been occurring by evil people. Think again. They have. Evilness knows no bounds. The fact Trudeau gets away with inciting hatred and division should show you how little they respect the rule of law. This is from a citizen with a story. Story of corruption by those your police forces do nothing about. Those who try are harassed abused by their own police and charged. The cowards who walk among us. Crimes in government are massive. Crimes by police the same who protect those criminals in government. Who supllies the cocaine and fentanyl and heroin to safe injection sites. The same ones who move drugs and hook the victims on the drugs in the first place, In bed with hells angels and other organized crime. Shutting down investigations by telling cops you can get killed if you keep investigating. Can you imagine that. Trudeau online twitter saying he will fight online terrorists and extremists. Did you have a mirror with you Trudeau to admire yourself.
Oh really what about your domestic terrorists desigrating Queen Elizabeth statutes and others during BLM riots.or those who fiire bombed CN Rail in blockades. Do you mean those ones you protect. You lied Trudeau to Canadians you actually protect the real terrorists and criminals not law abiding Canadians you abused and terrorized during covid and with vaccine mandates. Not the half million and rising law abiding peaceful citizens on TrudeauMustGo who are not Russian bots. Real everyday people. People injured by the vaccines. Pregnant females who chose to protect their unborn child and parents who protected their children who were segregated cruelly and unjustly and evilly. Hard working everyday Canadians including police officers and army. All with one common theme. Expressing their feelings. Not robots. Real people with real emotions. You lost Trudeau with your disrespect to Canadians who pay your salary as you mock Canadians with no accountability.
Trudeau is a criminal and a traitor. He has abused emergency powers to illegaly violate constitutional rights. He has targeted dissenters for persecution and censorship. He has fermented hate amongst the population. He has conspired with foriegners to cause much harm and despair to Canadians. He has coerced millions to take an unnecesary and potentially harmful medical injection under threat of job loss and freedom of movement.
🇨🇦 PM Turdeau 💩 (AKA Blackface) finally - after enough polpulace aggravation, travel delays and business/tourism losses - caved in to drop the infamous ArriveCan vax passport. This apparently came in on the heels of an announcement by a newly minted opposition leader's pledge to abolish it for good on day 1.
Is there some other other country still doing a Vax pass other than those dimwits?
Thanks Steve. You are a beacon of light and I appreciate the work you do.
This goes nicely with NEJM and John Hopkins studies that natural immunity is being destroyed from these vaxxes in young adults but it doesnt matter even under 60 it is the same. In Ontario Canada they put the survivor rate from covid and under 60 there was not much difference between different age groups especially when seeing vents and remdesivir was being uttiized improperly and killing.. This is sad because both adults and children have always gotten colds and they handle them no differently. Same symptoms and length of symptoms as well. The truth is being muddied with too much over analyzing. The vaccines are not good period and another 2 healthy young doctors died suddenly in Canada. 3 doctors in the last couple of months from McMaster in Hamilton Ontario. Knock Knock is there any doctors with working brain cells free of fear and brainwashing out there to figure out its no coincidence. There is a common thread here. Its disgusting when the City of Toronto puts out an ad and essentially it was attacking unvaccinated chilldren. Check out Joe Warrmington on twitter from the Toronto Sun who wrote a email to the City of Toronto demanding an explanation of why vaccinated children were being put as superior to unvaccinated children and unvaccinated children should not play outside. Go see tbe video ad pushing vaccines and be horrified and shocked at disgusting dehumanizing people in Ontario and Canada. A real disgrace to humanity based on this report and other studies and Denmark stopping the vaccines to children. Lawsuits cant come quick enough.
Bombshell study, but of course no word about it on the msm, and Canada is going on with their draconian COVID restrictions and vax mandates. Unreal, how many countries and officials are still pushing the fairytale of a safe and effective RNA vax, although all facts are disputing that notion.
Trying to reach you for an interview. Here is my column about this Liberal report you have posted. https://www.westernstandard.news/opinion/krayden-leaked-liberal-report-on-vaccines-blows-trudeaus-narrative-apart/article_a3cb6daa-3838-11ed-b2a7-9b72a8f83dba.html
Please contact me at dkrayden@westernstandard.news
Would love to interview you on this and your work.