Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Share this post

COVID vaccines and pregnancy: >416,186 spontaneous abortions due to the vaccine

stevekirsch.substack.com

COVID vaccines and pregnancy: >416,186 spontaneous abortions due to the vaccine

A new analysis by Dr. Jessica Rose estimates the number of spontaneous abortions caused by the COVID vaccines. It's over 416,186 to date. I've notified the CDC, but I don't expect to hear back.

Steve Kirsch
Jan 28, 2022
266
362
Share this post

COVID vaccines and pregnancy: >416,186 spontaneous abortions due to the vaccine

stevekirsch.substack.com
VAERS: vaccine reporting system has recorded more than 500 spontaneous  abortions after experimental COVID-19 "vaccines" - The COVID Blog

Here’s Jessica’s article on spontaneous abortions (SA) post-vaccination.

The Truth Watercooler
The true under reporting factor (URF) for miscarriages is 49.
This article is about calculating the URF using the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED). It was released recently and contains breath-taking data. This data set is special because it contains up-to-date data for every individual in the U.S. military with regards to their existing diseases, medical history and personal data…
Read more
a year ago · 30 likes · 8 comments · Jessica Rose

Basically, using rate data recently released from the Department of Defense, she computes an under reporting factor (URF) for VAERS for spontaneous abortions is 118. Since there are 3,527 reports of SA in the US in 2021, this represents 416,186 actual events. But a small number of those were not caused by the vaccine, somewhere around 1%.

Using the DMED data, the five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182. So that’s 3.4X the baseline rate (when extended to an annual rate).

The sanity checks both pass

Now, let’s do a “ballpark” sanity check on the VAERS numbers. In DMED, SAs after vax were 3.4X the baseline rate. In the US there are around 750K miscarriages per year. So if we multiply that by 3.4 and assume that 20% of the women were vaccinated within the first or second trimester (where the effect is largest), we get 510K which is not far from our VAERS estimate of 416K.

Our second sanity check is the URF of 118. We’ve determined before a URF for the most serious adverse events at 41. For less serious events, especially ones that nobody thinks is caused by the vaccine and is often many months from vaccination is easily 3X higher. So that makes sense as well.

I’ve notified the CDC of this, but I don’t expect them to change their policy of recommending the vaccine to pregnant women.

Also note that pregnant women were NOT included in the vaccine trials. It is medical malpractice to recommend the vaccines to pregnant women. The CDC repeatedly declared them safe for pregnant women without complete data.

I don’t expect the mainstream media to question the CDC on this at all. I’m sure they will all ignore it.

Supporting evidence in VAERS

Plenty of evidence in VAERS showing the vaccine messes with a woman’s reproductive organs just as we predicted from the biodistribution data (which targeted the ovaries).

You can view both the biodistribution data and the menstrual adverse effect data in this VAERS analysis article I wrote in November, 2022.

See also this article about IVF clinics and what happened in Singapore and syncytin-1.

For others, may I suggest if you disagree with this that you show us an error in the data or methodology?

VAERS sanity check #2: an 80X increase in event reports this year vs. reports from previous vaccines

There are an average of 14.4 SA events per year from all vaccines:

With the COVID vaccines, the SA reports in VAERS are 80X higher than a “normal” year:

DoD spokesman claims that the DMED database was underreported in 2016-2020

A PolitiFact “fact check” noted that:

But Peter Graves, spokesperson for the Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Surveillance Division, told PolitiFact by email that "in response to concerns mentioned in news reports" the division reviewed data in the DMED "and found that the data was incorrect for the years 2016-2020." 

What’s interesting that only the numbers related to adverse events caused by the vaccines (as determined in VAERS) were affected by this “glitch.” This sounds pretty fishy to me.

362
Share this post

COVID vaccines and pregnancy: >416,186 spontaneous abortions due to the vaccine

stevekirsch.substack.com
362 Comments
Mark Gresham
Writes Mark’s Newsletter
Aug 11, 2022·edited Aug 11, 2022

Wake County NC recommending vaccination during pregnancy! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liqanOP6Ibk&list=PLgHcLLatD51IplRezaBbjIRO9OgqaMM8C&index=34

Expand full comment
Reply
Barbara Douglas
Feb 3, 2022

You got me there!! Lol! Tricky dicks aren't they?👵😇

Expand full comment
Reply
360 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Steve Kirsch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing