Virus means toxin in Latin. Wuhan turned on 10,000 5G vase stations in the Fall of 2019. I believe that definitely affected the regions around China.
Virus is a catch-all word that has allowed Tony Fauci to develop shots and deadly drugs with his partners in crime Big Pharma and Big Vaccine.
No shot versus un-shot third-party testing or research has EVER been done.
The answer to this question is simple, WHAT TEST EXISTS THAT PROVES A VIRUS EXISTS IN A HUMAN?
The answer is NO TEST exists that proves a virus has been found in a human.
Talk to Dr Reiner Fuellmich, JD in Germany. He has witnesses that can prove that the RT-PCR CAN'T DIAGNOSE anything. Set above 24 cycle thresholds of magnification, it is unscientific. Kary Mullis, the inventor of RT-PCR spoke repeatedly that it is NOT a diagnostic test!
RT-PCR has been FAUCI's go to test for all his fake pandemics. NO test, means NO pandemic. No TEST means no CASES. No cases means No "VIRUS".
NO CASES means NO SARS-CoV-2 exists outside a computer generated model! Read this by Dr David Martin...Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier. Read the AG Document PDF regarding the felonies committed...at davidmartin.world
SARS-CoV-2 was created in a lab. It exists in the gene therapy shots! Read pages 67-70 of the Pfizer Phase 1/2/3 trial and learn about OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE. Pfizer was looking for occupational exposure in the people in contact with the study participants that took the shots. Body fluids, skin contact, and exhaled breath can cause occupational exposure in those NOT given the C19 shots and boosters.
Virology is anti-scence. It is just a means to make hamful products to hurt humans. Virology is genocide.
All virologists, not just those pictured, have deceived themselves and the public when they claim the existence of disease-causing viruses such as SARS-CoV-2.
Virologists inadvertently kill cells in test tubes, believing that this is proof of the presence and isolation of a virus. Only from fragments of dying cells do virologists mentally construct a gene sequence and pass it off as fact. Therefore, the test procedures do not offer any significance or meaning. Typical structures of dying cells in the electron microscope are passed off as viruses. Such structures could never be detected or recognized in a human being so far!
UNSER ZIEL
Diese Fehlentwicklungen haben die Medizin weit von der Realität und dem Verständnis von wahrer Gesundheit entfernt. Wir möchten einen Beitrag leisten, allen Menschen das Verständnis über Krankheit und Gesundheit umfassend näherzubringen.
OUR GOAL
These misguided developments have distanced medicine far from the reality and understanding of true health. We would like to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of disease and health for all people.
WIR GARANTIEREN:
1,5 Million € für einen Virologen, der den wissenschaftlichen Beweis der Existenz eines Corona-Virus vorlegt, inklusive der dokumentierten Kontrollversuche aller getätigten Schritte der Beweisführung.
Top, die Wette gilt!
WE GUARANTEE:
1,5 million € for a virologist who presents scientific proof of the existence of a corona virus, including documented control experiments of all steps taken in the proof.
I'm not sure if it was Lanka's or someone elses, but I think part of the experiment was that samples which didn't have any viral particles added to them had pictures identical to the ones with viral particles. Additionally, PCR from non viral samples returned positive results for few different viruses depending what you asked to find. PCR was positive for measles, flu, sars-cov-2 etc.
I guess, their claim is misrepresented. No one denise people are sick and signs and symptoms are consistent with i.e. Covid-19 or measles etc. The claim is that the current scientific method doesn't prove that it exists when both viral and non-viral sample pictures look the same and using PCR returns positive result depending what you ask it to look for. In comparison, bacterial culture when grown can be clearly visualised and based on its shape, staining we can determine the type of bacteria it is.
I suppose the problem with the claim that 600 labs repeat the same protocol and get same results is problematic if non-viral samples can also return positive results depending what you ask PCR machine to look for. Especially at high threshold cycles 40+ (standard number for most labs). Even Dr Science (aka Fauci) said that possibility that PCR run at 25+ threshold cycles is truely positive are miniscule.
Sorry to say Steve, you are unfortunately misleading people, you didn't ask if "measles" exists, you asked if the "measles virus" exists - those are two completely different questions. That is a shame that you would use such a low handed technique to wiggle your way out of this extremely important debate. I have to say I'm disappointed in the way you've dealt with this. You did get your reply and it was NO - because you where referring to "the virus" - very disappointed you did this. You don't reveal who your "experts" are but the other side is very ready to go into debate - you have behaved rather poorly here - and dare I say, done science a disservice, after all if you are so confident, they why not settle this - the whole world will be watching - I never took you for a coward.
Steve, what's your take on Stefan Lankas control experiments that show the same results as virologists claim is caused by viruses? One obviously doesn't need "infected material" to get the same results of cellular tissue breaking down and the identification of viral particles. If controls show that we can rule out the hypothesis that viral particles are pathogens, then we can instead assume the hypothesis that the method itself used by virologists, using poisons and restricted nutrion, is the cause of cellular breakdown. Do you or anyone else see any other plausible explanation to the results produce by the control experiments?
Here is a great breakdown of why the 'virus' doesn't exist:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/open-letter-to-dr-mercola-january-17-2022/
We have to defund Verizon. They are putting down 1,000 miles of 5 G each week all over the USA.
Virus means toxin in Latin. Wuhan turned on 10,000 5G vase stations in the Fall of 2019. I believe that definitely affected the regions around China.
Virus is a catch-all word that has allowed Tony Fauci to develop shots and deadly drugs with his partners in crime Big Pharma and Big Vaccine.
No shot versus un-shot third-party testing or research has EVER been done.
The answer to this question is simple, WHAT TEST EXISTS THAT PROVES A VIRUS EXISTS IN A HUMAN?
The answer is NO TEST exists that proves a virus has been found in a human.
Talk to Dr Reiner Fuellmich, JD in Germany. He has witnesses that can prove that the RT-PCR CAN'T DIAGNOSE anything. Set above 24 cycle thresholds of magnification, it is unscientific. Kary Mullis, the inventor of RT-PCR spoke repeatedly that it is NOT a diagnostic test!
RT-PCR has been FAUCI's go to test for all his fake pandemics. NO test, means NO pandemic. No TEST means no CASES. No cases means No "VIRUS".
NO CASES means NO SARS-CoV-2 exists outside a computer generated model! Read this by Dr David Martin...Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier. Read the AG Document PDF regarding the felonies committed...at davidmartin.world
SARS-CoV-2 was created in a lab. It exists in the gene therapy shots! Read pages 67-70 of the Pfizer Phase 1/2/3 trial and learn about OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE. Pfizer was looking for occupational exposure in the people in contact with the study participants that took the shots. Body fluids, skin contact, and exhaled breath can cause occupational exposure in those NOT given the C19 shots and boosters.
Virology is anti-scence. It is just a means to make hamful products to hurt humans. Virology is genocide.
TREMREGI The SAMDEMIC: COVID 19 SARS COV 2 The VIRUS THAT NEVER EXISTED
https://www.bitchute.com/video/btuJXs0glmla/
Poornima Wagh, 2 PhDs in Virology and Immunology, 20 yr career as a Lab researcher and scientist
Anyone who has taken the time to UNDERSTAND viruses and sars-cov-2 in particular knows that Steve is wrong here.
I am not making a claim one way or the other as to if sars-cov-2 causes covid-19, I do not know.
Steve is wrong when he claims that science based evidence exists that supports his hypothesis.
Zero controlled experiments have been run that even attempted to answer this question.
I read his blog and mostly agree, but Steve is not a scientist and doesn't even claim to be.
He does not understand what "science based evidence" means
Possibilities
As with the 1918 pandemic
Also the Rockefeller mass injection,
now the flu shot (there are a couple of studies as to the correlation)
Also a study from the 1918 pandemic where NO contagion was proven
…..
Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G
https://www.facebook.com/groups/409405940198405/permalink/641245090347821/
Don’t know if still on…
https://www.samueleckert.net/isolate-truth-fund/
WE NOTICED...
All virologists, not just those pictured, have deceived themselves and the public when they claim the existence of disease-causing viruses such as SARS-CoV-2.
Virologists inadvertently kill cells in test tubes, believing that this is proof of the presence and isolation of a virus. Only from fragments of dying cells do virologists mentally construct a gene sequence and pass it off as fact. Therefore, the test procedures do not offer any significance or meaning. Typical structures of dying cells in the electron microscope are passed off as viruses. Such structures could never be detected or recognized in a human being so far!
UNSER ZIEL
Diese Fehlentwicklungen haben die Medizin weit von der Realität und dem Verständnis von wahrer Gesundheit entfernt. Wir möchten einen Beitrag leisten, allen Menschen das Verständnis über Krankheit und Gesundheit umfassend näherzubringen.
OUR GOAL
These misguided developments have distanced medicine far from the reality and understanding of true health. We would like to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of disease and health for all people.
WIR GARANTIEREN:
1,5 Million € für einen Virologen, der den wissenschaftlichen Beweis der Existenz eines Corona-Virus vorlegt, inklusive der dokumentierten Kontrollversuche aller getätigten Schritte der Beweisführung.
Top, die Wette gilt!
WE GUARANTEE:
1,5 million € for a virologist who presents scientific proof of the existence of a corona virus, including documented control experiments of all steps taken in the proof.
You’re on!
https://www.facebook.com/groups/409405940198405/permalink/674912843647712/
Dr. Robert Gallo's 1984 Science Publication -- Preview for The Emperor's New Virus?
I'm not sure if it was Lanka's or someone elses, but I think part of the experiment was that samples which didn't have any viral particles added to them had pictures identical to the ones with viral particles. Additionally, PCR from non viral samples returned positive results for few different viruses depending what you asked to find. PCR was positive for measles, flu, sars-cov-2 etc.
I guess, their claim is misrepresented. No one denise people are sick and signs and symptoms are consistent with i.e. Covid-19 or measles etc. The claim is that the current scientific method doesn't prove that it exists when both viral and non-viral sample pictures look the same and using PCR returns positive result depending what you ask it to look for. In comparison, bacterial culture when grown can be clearly visualised and based on its shape, staining we can determine the type of bacteria it is.
I suppose the problem with the claim that 600 labs repeat the same protocol and get same results is problematic if non-viral samples can also return positive results depending what you ask PCR machine to look for. Especially at high threshold cycles 40+ (standard number for most labs). Even Dr Science (aka Fauci) said that possibility that PCR run at 25+ threshold cycles is truely positive are miniscule.
You don't understand. Just because a "virus" exists doesn't mean it's entering cells, replicating itself and causing disease. That's the issue here.
Sorry to say Steve, you are unfortunately misleading people, you didn't ask if "measles" exists, you asked if the "measles virus" exists - those are two completely different questions. That is a shame that you would use such a low handed technique to wiggle your way out of this extremely important debate. I have to say I'm disappointed in the way you've dealt with this. You did get your reply and it was NO - because you where referring to "the virus" - very disappointed you did this. You don't reveal who your "experts" are but the other side is very ready to go into debate - you have behaved rather poorly here - and dare I say, done science a disservice, after all if you are so confident, they why not settle this - the whole world will be watching - I never took you for a coward.
Desperate you are who turns a blind eye.
Yes - where is it?
Steve, what's your take on Stefan Lankas control experiments that show the same results as virologists claim is caused by viruses? One obviously doesn't need "infected material" to get the same results of cellular tissue breaking down and the identification of viral particles. If controls show that we can rule out the hypothesis that viral particles are pathogens, then we can instead assume the hypothesis that the method itself used by virologists, using poisons and restricted nutrion, is the cause of cellular breakdown. Do you or anyone else see any other plausible explanation to the results produce by the control experiments?
Just get those losers you were planning to sick on Christine Massey. Oh wait they're cowards and weaklings too.
You're a pointless little weakling and coward.