Dr. Cadegiani just published his research paper (moments after this interview) showing deliberate scientific sabotage by Pfizer. If there is another explanation, he's all ears.
Congratualtions to Flavio and many thanks go to Steve!
My Question to Dr Cadegiani if at all possible: Has EGCG got similar effect as say Dutasteride?? (I am a health professional.)
Dr Cadegiani, according to your research on Anti-Androgens, my C-19 prophylactic should work? A brief comment from you would be very much appreciated.
I made up an anti viral (C-19) prophylactic regimen in July 2020 which uses EpiGalloCatechinG (EGCG) and Quercetin as Zinc ionophores. (Other contents: Melatonin, Vit D3, Co-E Q10, low dose aspirin - inspired by Raoult, Seheult and Zelenko)
I know someone who manages C0VID clinical trials for Pfizer; she started working for them right after Biden came into office. Before Biden was in office, and before she got hired by Pfizer, she admitted that she could find only limited information about the injection trials.
Now... she is 110% all injection all the time. A while ago, I sent her a different substack article that talked about unblinding one of the studies; it made her very, VERY angry. She resorted to calling the writer names, and basically said "people don't understand how difficult these studies are to do, and how many people are involved, so of course there are problems." She also disparaged the article because it would "discourage people from taking part in clinical trials in the future and made the industry look bad."
Then... there was the tell: according to her, the study HAD to be unblinded because if they did not, the people who did not take the shots would die. She--and I'm sure many others-- really believe that if you do NOT get injected and you get C0VID, you WILL die horribly.
In other words... they have to, at best, do shoddy trials or at worst, rig the trials, so their products can SAVE LIVES. In their minds, bad research is better than no research, a drug that harms is better than no drug because THEY ARE SAVING LIVES EVERY DAY.
I don't know if it is just me but from the very beginning, as with HIV/AIDS, there was a push for a novel vaccine as a be all and end all. I don't watch much TV and definitely not mainstream propaganda but the 3 shows I watch have included commercials from Pfizer. When shots (they are not vaccines but experimental gene therapies) first introduced, Pfizer commercials say they are safe and effective with the marketing spin of saving grandma. When data starts coming out that shots are injuring and killing people, Pfizer's preemptive commercials start airing on what a wonderful, humanitarian company they are, doing their part to eliminate disease (impossible task) and save humanity. Now commercials are airing where somehow you can prevent COVID-19 with an oral medication which is an Ivermectin derivative by Pfizer. How about that...Ivermectin would have saved all the deaths, illnesses and injury all along and now Pfizer can patent this derivative and push it while WHO and other health authorities ban the cheaper true healer, IVERMECTIN.
1) It's a coincidence that 85% of this medical doctor's patients are suffering long-term pain or chronic disability commencing immediately after receiving the Covid vaccine.
2) It's a coincidence that 20 of this medical doctor's patients suffered premature menopause immediately after receiving the Covid vaccine.
2) It's meaningless that male rats had a huge concentration of spike protein in their testicles after receiving the Covid vaccine. Any reproduction problems would only be a coincidence.
Steve, I'm sure you're aware, Big Pharma corrupting their clinical trials has been going on for a long time, and in products developed for young people.
From the text book Vaccines & Autoimmunity (Shoenfeld et al., 2015):
"...all published Gardasil and Cervarix safety trials used either an Al-adjuvant containing placebo or hepatitis B vaccine as the "control" group (Harper et al., 2004, 2006; Villa et al., 2005; Mao et al.. 2006; Garland et al., 2007a,b; Verstraeten et al., 2008; Munoz et al., 2009). This practice persists in vaccine trials despite considerable data showing that Al in vaccine-relevant exposures is neurotoxic and can have unintended adverse immunological effects (Petrick et al., 2007; Couette et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Passeri et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2013) and that therefore it cannot constitute a valid placebo."
To top it off, the FDA fast-tracked approval even with these compromised trials.
Gardasil *was intended for adolescent girls and young women*. Yet Merck INTENTIONALLY designed the studies to hide adverse effects. Does it get more sinister than that?
Here, here are BILLIONS of dollars for a product, OH and you will NOT be held liable for any damages it causes, just get it out there fast.
What do you think is going to happen. If they weren't first on race day then one of the others would have surely been there. It's only a matter of time before we finally open our eyes and see that ALL of them made billions off poisoning the masses with zero consequences.
This is nothing new. Trials are designed with the endpoint first. What endpoints do you want, engineer the study backwards from there. I commented (elsewhere) as far back as June 2021 that the adult trials were 'crafty', deaths were covered up because they were classified as having 'dropped out of the trial' because they died before the end of the 2 month monitoring period. These same issues that Dr. C bring up, I brought up in communication to FDA regarding the pediatric extension study, poorly, (but brilliantly), designed to meet their pre-designed endpoints. This is nothing new.
Flávio Cadegiani is such a bright researcher on Covid field since the beginning of the pandemic. As a MD, I can say that I’ve treated hundreds of patients supported by his and other colleagues work. Keep going. The truth will eventually come out. Great interview.
The vax and the pineapple gland (epifyse). Please read the WHY.
zonderreden.substack.com
https://zonderreden.substack.com/p/the-vax-and-its-real-purpose
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2819
Congratualtions to Flavio and many thanks go to Steve!
My Question to Dr Cadegiani if at all possible: Has EGCG got similar effect as say Dutasteride?? (I am a health professional.)
Dr Cadegiani, according to your research on Anti-Androgens, my C-19 prophylactic should work? A brief comment from you would be very much appreciated.
I made up an anti viral (C-19) prophylactic regimen in July 2020 which uses EpiGalloCatechinG (EGCG) and Quercetin as Zinc ionophores. (Other contents: Melatonin, Vit D3, Co-E Q10, low dose aspirin - inspired by Raoult, Seheult and Zelenko)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058706/
NIH says 9 Dec 2010 ... Our results demonstrated that the beneficial effects of green tea polyphenol are associated with its antiandrogenic action!!
Quackzines, bio weapons and so on:
Attorney Tom Renz says Big Pharma immunity is not covered for willful misconduct.
Well, can he prove wilful misconduct?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dnYEFNiQfPBM/
Then a few hours ago Steve Kirsch News letter. March 18, 2022 at 7:04 am (Australia)
"BOMB SHELL in my view. Willful Misconduct"?
Deliberate sabotage by Pfizer!?!? Would Steve Kirsch/Dr Cadegiani contact Renz LAW?
The local mafias must look in awe to gangs like Pfizer.
I know someone who manages C0VID clinical trials for Pfizer; she started working for them right after Biden came into office. Before Biden was in office, and before she got hired by Pfizer, she admitted that she could find only limited information about the injection trials.
Now... she is 110% all injection all the time. A while ago, I sent her a different substack article that talked about unblinding one of the studies; it made her very, VERY angry. She resorted to calling the writer names, and basically said "people don't understand how difficult these studies are to do, and how many people are involved, so of course there are problems." She also disparaged the article because it would "discourage people from taking part in clinical trials in the future and made the industry look bad."
Then... there was the tell: according to her, the study HAD to be unblinded because if they did not, the people who did not take the shots would die. She--and I'm sure many others-- really believe that if you do NOT get injected and you get C0VID, you WILL die horribly.
In other words... they have to, at best, do shoddy trials or at worst, rig the trials, so their products can SAVE LIVES. In their minds, bad research is better than no research, a drug that harms is better than no drug because THEY ARE SAVING LIVES EVERY DAY.
I don't know if it is just me but from the very beginning, as with HIV/AIDS, there was a push for a novel vaccine as a be all and end all. I don't watch much TV and definitely not mainstream propaganda but the 3 shows I watch have included commercials from Pfizer. When shots (they are not vaccines but experimental gene therapies) first introduced, Pfizer commercials say they are safe and effective with the marketing spin of saving grandma. When data starts coming out that shots are injuring and killing people, Pfizer's preemptive commercials start airing on what a wonderful, humanitarian company they are, doing their part to eliminate disease (impossible task) and save humanity. Now commercials are airing where somehow you can prevent COVID-19 with an oral medication which is an Ivermectin derivative by Pfizer. How about that...Ivermectin would have saved all the deaths, illnesses and injury all along and now Pfizer can patent this derivative and push it while WHO and other health authorities ban the cheaper true healer, IVERMECTIN.
What is the use of peer reviews when the reviewer does not have all the data?
Yup - it's all coincidence:
1) It's a coincidence that 85% of this medical doctor's patients are suffering long-term pain or chronic disability commencing immediately after receiving the Covid vaccine.
2) It's a coincidence that 20 of this medical doctor's patients suffered premature menopause immediately after receiving the Covid vaccine.
2) It's meaningless that male rats had a huge concentration of spike protein in their testicles after receiving the Covid vaccine. Any reproduction problems would only be a coincidence.
Vaccines Good / Vaccines Bad ?
https://theagingviking.substack.com/p/vaccines-good-vaccines-bad-?utm_source=email
Steve, I'm sure you're aware, Big Pharma corrupting their clinical trials has been going on for a long time, and in products developed for young people.
From the text book Vaccines & Autoimmunity (Shoenfeld et al., 2015):
"...all published Gardasil and Cervarix safety trials used either an Al-adjuvant containing placebo or hepatitis B vaccine as the "control" group (Harper et al., 2004, 2006; Villa et al., 2005; Mao et al.. 2006; Garland et al., 2007a,b; Verstraeten et al., 2008; Munoz et al., 2009). This practice persists in vaccine trials despite considerable data showing that Al in vaccine-relevant exposures is neurotoxic and can have unintended adverse immunological effects (Petrick et al., 2007; Couette et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009; Passeri et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2013) and that therefore it cannot constitute a valid placebo."
To top it off, the FDA fast-tracked approval even with these compromised trials.
Gardasil *was intended for adolescent girls and young women*. Yet Merck INTENTIONALLY designed the studies to hide adverse effects. Does it get more sinister than that?
What do you expect.
Here, here are BILLIONS of dollars for a product, OH and you will NOT be held liable for any damages it causes, just get it out there fast.
What do you think is going to happen. If they weren't first on race day then one of the others would have surely been there. It's only a matter of time before we finally open our eyes and see that ALL of them made billions off poisoning the masses with zero consequences.
Go on multiple browsers and search the words - Pfizer criminal. They have a dark history.
J&J can't even make safe baby powder or sunscreen.
Moderna never had a successful product before their "not a vaccine."
Monsanto-Bayer is still selling glyphosate-roundup. It is in so much of what we eat each day.
Thalidomide victims are still trying to get recompense.
All the drug companies prior to 2020 gamed the system. This is a well known fact.
This is nothing new. Trials are designed with the endpoint first. What endpoints do you want, engineer the study backwards from there. I commented (elsewhere) as far back as June 2021 that the adult trials were 'crafty', deaths were covered up because they were classified as having 'dropped out of the trial' because they died before the end of the 2 month monitoring period. These same issues that Dr. C bring up, I brought up in communication to FDA regarding the pediatric extension study, poorly, (but brilliantly), designed to meet their pre-designed endpoints. This is nothing new.
please post your videos to rumble.links to you tube get censored.
Flávio Cadegiani is such a bright researcher on Covid field since the beginning of the pandemic. As a MD, I can say that I’ve treated hundreds of patients supported by his and other colleagues work. Keep going. The truth will eventually come out. Great interview.