I was able to obtain death/vax records for people who died in Connecticut. The data provided new insights for how the vaccines kill people of different ages. I was surprised.
I added a link to the CDC data showing that ACM is up in 2021 and 2022. That means the intervention made things worse (unless someone can identify the "real" killer).
Just as a side comment about the "no spike in deaht after 2 weeks". Let's be realistic here for a second. a dead person cannot report his own death, it must be doctors or nurses (too busy) or a family member who will. We know how loosing someone is difficult and the funeral arrangements time-consuming. 2 weeks later you just want to stop thinking about the whole thing and grieve. Forget reports.
How can they have any data since they have no data because there was little to no research prior to intitaing the thing. Arent you and others doing the research, as the populations of regions/nations etc. is one giant testing facility...
Those that took it are the test subjects those that did not are the 'control group'...
Results will be ongoing and finalized in about 6 years! LOL
Thanks for the due dilligence, patience and focus!!!
The vaccination records you are missing could have been cherry-picked for being particularly damining of the shots. I think it is misleading to provide an analysis when you may have been given data that was skewed to show, for example, no increased deaths in the first 30 days after vaccination. In other words, this could have been a set up.
This is like looking for a dime in a room with better light not the room where it was lost. The jab has a list lets just say 20 side effects all of which over time can be fatal. A snap shot of 30 day or 90 days misses the entire point. The jab will damage everyone who took it be it one shot or 3 boosters. The clock is ticking for every one who took the jab. There is no way out for the millions of people that took the jab they are all harmed.
The ONS (Office for National Statistics) will produce the "Death by all causes in England, by vaccination status" report on 21st February 2023-the first since July 22 when the data was getting to look embarrassing so the report was dropped. This has come about because Andrew Bridgen M.P. and Esther McVey M.P. have asked questions in Parliament and brave scientists, medical staff and statisticians have been pressing for the data. Joel Smalley ( Dead Man Walking) and John Dee (NHS retired statistician) will be all over this data and they both have Substack accounts.
Also those CCP swabs. Our government lied saying those were cotton swabs. Even a 50x microscope could detect antennalike silverly threads on the top. My mild cold began at the same side of the face I got mandatorirly swabraped twice. Mild "cold" for 3 days. Also temporarily deaf at that ear. Those like the poisonjabs passed our so called regulators for drug safety as nothing. Even funnier when you know the germtheory is a hoax.
I've never quite understood counting deaths as a number, especially for older people. If you have 100 people and 50 die, then you have reduced the possible death cohort by one half. Those 50 people will never die again. So now you have 50 people and 25 die. It looks like the death rate is getting better but there are fewer people who had the ability to die. Still 1/2 of the people died, but only 25 as opposed to 50. This looks great on a chart. First death wave was 50, second was only 25!!! As you keep going, the death rate decreases if you are counting numbers not percentages of how many are left. There are fewer left to die. I'd like to know the percentages based on who is left.
YES WHY DO THEY WANT TO HIDE ALL THE SERIOUS DANGEROUS DATA. BIG PARMER AND THE GLOBALISTS AGENDA SO THEY CAN GO ON MAKING $BILLIONS AND CARRY ON KILLING AND MAIMING INNOCENT PEOPLE.
"There was NO spike in deaths in the first 30 days after the vaccine was given for any age group. That was the biggest surprise to me. So the spike in deaths post-vaccine administration as reported in VAERS is simply due to the time proximity making it more likely that the event is recognized and reported. It is a reporting artifact."
This assumes the data you have is accurate. It also assumes they are correctly labelling "vaccine" status, which has been misleadingly described in government data everywhere ("vaccinated" = 2 doses and weeks after second dose. "Unvaccinated" = everyone else including those vaccinated with 1 dose, etc.)
I added a link to the CDC data showing that ACM is up in 2021 and 2022. That means the intervention made things worse (unless someone can identify the "real" killer).
Just as a side comment about the "no spike in deaht after 2 weeks". Let's be realistic here for a second. a dead person cannot report his own death, it must be doctors or nurses (too busy) or a family member who will. We know how loosing someone is difficult and the funeral arrangements time-consuming. 2 weeks later you just want to stop thinking about the whole thing and grieve. Forget reports.
Never argue with a Liar’s Lie. After you have done your homework and confirmed the lie, then you must confront the lie of the liar directly.
Just a thought, could the lower deaths rate in elderly be due to so many are already taking medication for heart and or blood pressure issues, etc?
Great. MDs on drugs for depression prescribing drugs for patients. What could go wrong?
How can they have any data since they have no data because there was little to no research prior to intitaing the thing. Arent you and others doing the research, as the populations of regions/nations etc. is one giant testing facility...
Those that took it are the test subjects those that did not are the 'control group'...
Results will be ongoing and finalized in about 6 years! LOL
Thanks for the due dilligence, patience and focus!!!
The vaccination records you are missing could have been cherry-picked for being particularly damining of the shots. I think it is misleading to provide an analysis when you may have been given data that was skewed to show, for example, no increased deaths in the first 30 days after vaccination. In other words, this could have been a set up.
This is like looking for a dime in a room with better light not the room where it was lost. The jab has a list lets just say 20 side effects all of which over time can be fatal. A snap shot of 30 day or 90 days misses the entire point. The jab will damage everyone who took it be it one shot or 3 boosters. The clock is ticking for every one who took the jab. There is no way out for the millions of people that took the jab they are all harmed.
The ONS (Office for National Statistics) will produce the "Death by all causes in England, by vaccination status" report on 21st February 2023-the first since July 22 when the data was getting to look embarrassing so the report was dropped. This has come about because Andrew Bridgen M.P. and Esther McVey M.P. have asked questions in Parliament and brave scientists, medical staff and statisticians have been pressing for the data. Joel Smalley ( Dead Man Walking) and John Dee (NHS retired statistician) will be all over this data and they both have Substack accounts.
Also those CCP swabs. Our government lied saying those were cotton swabs. Even a 50x microscope could detect antennalike silverly threads on the top. My mild cold began at the same side of the face I got mandatorirly swabraped twice. Mild "cold" for 3 days. Also temporarily deaf at that ear. Those like the poisonjabs passed our so called regulators for drug safety as nothing. Even funnier when you know the germtheory is a hoax.
I've never quite understood counting deaths as a number, especially for older people. If you have 100 people and 50 die, then you have reduced the possible death cohort by one half. Those 50 people will never die again. So now you have 50 people and 25 die. It looks like the death rate is getting better but there are fewer people who had the ability to die. Still 1/2 of the people died, but only 25 as opposed to 50. This looks great on a chart. First death wave was 50, second was only 25!!! As you keep going, the death rate decreases if you are counting numbers not percentages of how many are left. There are fewer left to die. I'd like to know the percentages based on who is left.
Local health departments, hospitals, and physicians are a disgrace for administering the Covid evperimental drug.
YES WHY DO THEY WANT TO HIDE ALL THE SERIOUS DANGEROUS DATA. BIG PARMER AND THE GLOBALISTS AGENDA SO THEY CAN GO ON MAKING $BILLIONS AND CARRY ON KILLING AND MAIMING INNOCENT PEOPLE.
Thanks for the best laugh I've had today. Perfect.
"There was NO spike in deaths in the first 30 days after the vaccine was given for any age group. That was the biggest surprise to me. So the spike in deaths post-vaccine administration as reported in VAERS is simply due to the time proximity making it more likely that the event is recognized and reported. It is a reporting artifact."
This assumes the data you have is accurate. It also assumes they are correctly labelling "vaccine" status, which has been misleadingly described in government data everywhere ("vaccinated" = 2 doses and weeks after second dose. "Unvaccinated" = everyone else including those vaccinated with 1 dose, etc.)
The Third Pillar of Islam is Zakat (charity)
Türkiye and Syria desperately need our help right now.
In the USA
https://irusa.org/
In Canada
https://donate.islamicreliefcanada.org/
In the UK
https://www.islamic-relief.org.uk/