I came across this gentleman today. He is an analyst and has been collecting data since 2020. He’s put together a great website. All linked and put together with gov data and peer reviewed papers. Here is his info.
I think we have all heard that Hospitals are preventing their doctors from making VAERS reports. But many doctors have to be getting suspicious by now. They might not do a VARES report, but might answer a survey that asks how many injuries have you seen, and how many did you report? Add the question "do you believe the vaccines are causing this injury?" to filter out anti-science/truth hesitancy types. Being by surveying each each injury separately, and send it to likely specialists and GPs. Perhaps a wider group? PAs, Nurses, lab techs? It makes sense to start with the anaphylaxis, which is assumed to be caused by the lipid nano-paritcle, not the vaccine per se. If that works, then try something else innocuous like shingles. Then graduate to the serious stuff.
Of course, what I thought of as I was writing this was, why not scale this idea up to a private VARES. By guaranteeing anonymity, adding questions designed to measure the reporting fraction and making it proactive instead of voluntary respondents might be more forth coming and you could get the data the CDC is suppressing.
You've done some small anecdotal surveys, perhaps it's time to scale it up. You have also offered a lot of money to individuals to participate, only to have them decline. Why not switch gears and spend some of that money on getting email lists and sending out surveys to doctors? You might strike out again, but maybe not.
" seroconversion to anti-N Abs at a median follow up of 53 days post diagnosis occurred in 21/52 (40%) of the mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients vs. 605/648 (93%) of the placebo"
Steve, I fully support what you are doing, but calculating UFR on anaphylaxis, may not transfer to UFR for death. There are lots of arguments why one may report one to VAERS and not the other. Also, for death I think it will be age dependent. For elderly a doctor may just assume it is natural, while for health 10 year old's it is more likely to be reported. I think you need to at least mention this, because the whole argument of how many deaths you had depend on the UFR.
It also matters because the higher the death count, the more clearly one should see this in excess death. But we don't always see this directly, which means large amounts of deaths must be misclassified. We should then be able to prove that too, proving the argument from two sides.
Also the MGM study relied on self reporting so they make an unsupported claim: "All individuals with anaphylaxis recovered without shock or endotracheal intubation." They had no way to rule out death by anaphylaxis once patient had left vaccination center.
I heard from coworkers who work at Stanford that a lot of people including staff had issues with this. It's labeled as pre-jab anxiety. They tell me that the nurses had some anxiety or psych issues and that they would nervously talk about all the RRT calls at the vaccine site which of course would only increase they're anxiety levels while receiving a vaccine. I suspect Stanford may have received some bad batches in the early months of the vaccine rollout.
If you're in the medical field and have vaccine anxiety or suspicions you're considered a Trump supporter and or in need of a mental health check up.
Thank u. I am currently working with a Dr. That follows their protocol. The BIGGEST problem is that the meds, treatments, and supplements needed to detox are not covered by insurance. The cost is EXTREMELY expensive. Hard to do, when I have been unable to work for 19 months. The entire situation is very discouraging.
I just watched the whole video. He just may be right about JFK's faked assassination.
If he is, it greatly lessons my esteem for that president. However, the truth has always
been most important to me. There are some red flags concerning this man's views. He
seems to be a great believer in astrology (a pagan form of sun worship.) I knew that
it was bogus before I was 20. (My mother believed in it.) He speaks about years from
now. IMPO (In My Prayerful Opinion) Biblically and escatalogically I believe that the final years
of this age of 6000 years will end on a Yom Kippur between 2023 and 2027. A reset?
Don't think so! The green back will remain "green" and go with THEM into bug out
bunkers which they may be getting ready to go into now. ???
For "allergic reactions or anaphylaxis", this study put the number at 1 in 334 doses for a first dose of Pfizer or Moderna.
"Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Type and Adverse Effects Following Vaccination"
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2787361
https://twitter.com/dksdata/status/1558524446373163011?s=21&t=k6EHFzXhYjdmpHBa4xtZng
https://twitter.com/dksdata/status/1558525246562390016?s=21&t=k6EHFzXhYjdmpHBa4xtZng
I came across this gentleman today. He is an analyst and has been collecting data since 2020. He’s put together a great website. All linked and put together with gov data and peer reviewed papers. Here is his info.
https://twitter.com/dksdata/status/1558517497824874497?s=21&t=k6EHFzXhYjdmpHBa4xtZng
https://dksdata.com/COVArticles
The more patriots we have working together the better!
I think we have all heard that Hospitals are preventing their doctors from making VAERS reports. But many doctors have to be getting suspicious by now. They might not do a VARES report, but might answer a survey that asks how many injuries have you seen, and how many did you report? Add the question "do you believe the vaccines are causing this injury?" to filter out anti-science/truth hesitancy types. Being by surveying each each injury separately, and send it to likely specialists and GPs. Perhaps a wider group? PAs, Nurses, lab techs? It makes sense to start with the anaphylaxis, which is assumed to be caused by the lipid nano-paritcle, not the vaccine per se. If that works, then try something else innocuous like shingles. Then graduate to the serious stuff.
Of course, what I thought of as I was writing this was, why not scale this idea up to a private VARES. By guaranteeing anonymity, adding questions designed to measure the reporting fraction and making it proactive instead of voluntary respondents might be more forth coming and you could get the data the CDC is suppressing.
You've done some small anecdotal surveys, perhaps it's time to scale it up. You have also offered a lot of money to individuals to participate, only to have them decline. Why not switch gears and spend some of that money on getting email lists and sending out surveys to doctors? You might strike out again, but maybe not.
Anaphylaxis----remember Tiffany Dover?
What a cute, upbeat, normalizing little infographic! [I'm utterly disgusted, sarcastic, repulsed.]
[:-(
[ SC2 + vax -> Parkinsons's? ]
STEVE - did you check your anti-N antibodies?
1. some mRNA vaxed folks can't make anti-N Abs
" seroconversion to anti-N Abs at a median follow up of 53 days post diagnosis occurred in 21/52 (40%) of the mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients vs. 605/648 (93%) of the placebo"
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.18.22271936v1
2. nucleocapsid protein (N-protein) considerably speeds up the α-synuclein aggregation process.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00666
1+2: People who have received vaccinations should make an extra effort to prevent reinfections because 60% of them lack N -> amyloids -> parkinsons.
What is the actual hell is going on in this world.
Folks - thoughts? please tell me I'm wrong. Are we gonna see the entire medical industry crumble down?
Steve, I fully support what you are doing, but calculating UFR on anaphylaxis, may not transfer to UFR for death. There are lots of arguments why one may report one to VAERS and not the other. Also, for death I think it will be age dependent. For elderly a doctor may just assume it is natural, while for health 10 year old's it is more likely to be reported. I think you need to at least mention this, because the whole argument of how many deaths you had depend on the UFR.
It also matters because the higher the death count, the more clearly one should see this in excess death. But we don't always see this directly, which means large amounts of deaths must be misclassified. We should then be able to prove that too, proving the argument from two sides.
Also the MGM study relied on self reporting so they make an unsupported claim: "All individuals with anaphylaxis recovered without shock or endotracheal intubation." They had no way to rule out death by anaphylaxis once patient had left vaccination center.
To my knowledge anaphalaxis is a short term side effect of a number of vaccines also insect stings. Seems like there are bigger fish to fry, no?
I heard from coworkers who work at Stanford that a lot of people including staff had issues with this. It's labeled as pre-jab anxiety. They tell me that the nurses had some anxiety or psych issues and that they would nervously talk about all the RRT calls at the vaccine site which of course would only increase they're anxiety levels while receiving a vaccine. I suspect Stanford may have received some bad batches in the early months of the vaccine rollout.
If you're in the medical field and have vaccine anxiety or suspicions you're considered a Trump supporter and or in need of a mental health check up.
Thank u. I am currently working with a Dr. That follows their protocol. The BIGGEST problem is that the meds, treatments, and supplements needed to detox are not covered by insurance. The cost is EXTREMELY expensive. Hard to do, when I have been unable to work for 19 months. The entire situation is very discouraging.
Mass General is all in on COVID propaganda I presume.
New https://www.patrioticviralnews.com/articles/1-in-5000-vaccinations-suffered-adverse-event/