How can they explain any of this data?
UK government data show the more you vaccinate, the more likely you are to get COVID. Whoops! And much much more.
I have over 50 pieces of data that is simply impossible to explain if the vaccines are safe and effective. I’ll be adding them to this article over time, so check back for the latest. I’ll post the most recent additions at the top to make this easy.
From a nurse: hundreds of people per day in the ER
Someone is lying.
15 players retire/withdraw from Miami Open: this isn’t normal
Why are blood clots in 15 year olds now the new normal?
See VAERS 2161826. Happened just two days after being vaccinated. Had to have surgery to remove clots in both legs. No other vaccines or COVID. Wonder what caused it?? He almost died. Pfizer dose #1. Wow.
Myocarditis rates at Lyme-Old Lyme High School in Connecticut are OFF THE CHARTS too
Luke Celic is one of the students at Lyme-Old Lyme High School. But there are 2 other boys with the same condition. There are only around 230 boys in the school. So that’s a rate of 3 out of 230, or 1.3% of the boys. That is not “rare.” That is a TRAIN WRECK.
Remember that in Watsonville the Monte Vista Christian School has 4 cases in fewer than 400 vaccinated boys, again a rate of 1 in 100 or more.
And we know from my doctor friends in the military who all tell me that the myocarditis rate there is over 1% as well.
Of course, the CDC is on it! They are studying the problem. But they aren’t sure it is related to the vaccine or not. After all, there are no other possible explanations. We’ll know in about 75 years I think.
Why are we rushing to get Moderna approved for kids under 6 on an emergency basis when it doesn’t work?
I wish this were a joke, but it isn’t.
Moderna plans to ask the Food and Drug Administration to authorize its mRNA jabs for infants as young as six months.
The company this morning released partial results from a clinical trial of its shots in 6,700 children up to six years old. The trial showed the mRNA jabs had little benefit in reducing Covid infections and caused fevers in many children, including fevers of more than 104 degrees in a handful.
Moderna claimed in a press release it believes the shots might reduce the risk of severe Covid in young children. But the trial showed nothing of the sort. No children in it had severe Covid, so the company could not evaluate whether the shots actually will have meaningful benefit against serious illness.
Why in Australia do they keep the data secret?
from a reader:
Thanks for the great work in holding these people who are hiding the adverse effects of the vaccine to account
At least in the US you have the VEAES database available.
In Australia the adverse event data is not available to the public, it is a sate secret. In Australia the general population think the vaccine is totally safe. Anti vaxxers especially in Western Australia have been totally isolated and have been made into the Jews of the 21 century. We have vaccine mandates for 90% of the working population And to buy a coffee or have a meal in a restaurant, we have to show proof of vaccination, and you must have 3 doses of a vaccine.So please keep up the good work in exposing just how unsafe the vaccine is and how governments have illegally trampled our freedoms and rights
More athletes with cardiac problems
Canada data shows vaccinated have higher infection rates
New post on The Expose
Pfizer, FDA Hid Data Showing Clinical Trials Failed, Says Former BlackRock Advisor
In an interview with Naomi Wolf, former BlackRock investment advisor Edward Dowd explained why Wall Street lost faith in Pfizer and Moderna stocks when Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration tried to hide clinical trial data.
Can you explain all these headlines?
Results highlight that even in the absence of direct SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 illness, the environmental changes associated COVID-19 pandemic is significantly and negatively affecting infant and child development
After three months the vaccine effectiveness of Pfizer & Moderna against Omicron is actually negative. Pfizer customers are 76.5% more likely and Moderna customers are 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaxxed people
Why would Geert Vanden Bossche who is pro-vaccine call for a halt to the vaccines? What is his motivation?
Mystery firefighter death. He just died.
I can recall ever in my life seeing “he just died unexpectedly” article for young people. Have you?
Why doctors say nothing
Because the medical boards threaten to take away their license if they say anything publicly or privately against the vaccine.
In California, doctors used to write exemptions for the vaccine and mask wearing. The medical boards got a list of those doctors and contacted them.
After that, no more exemptions got written.
To test this someone called up hundreds of physicians saying their child had a severe anaphylactic reaction after the first shot and nearly died and they wanted to see if the doctor would write an exemption for the child. They all said no.
UK government data shows the vaccines make things worse. We were misled.
This is data from an unimpeachable source: the UK government in its week 32 to 35 report for 2021. Look at the rates per 100,000 for doubly vaxxed vs. unvaccinated people for age ranges 40 to 80. Yup, you are more likely to be infected if you are vaccinated in each sub-range within 40 to 80. So there is no age confounding on this data. It’s simply impossible to explain. It shows why vaccine mandates are making you more susceptible to infection for people 40 to 80, not better.
Show this chart to your blue pill friends and ask them to explain why the vaccine should be mandated. Here’s what one reader wrote:
I actually shared a similar report with my cardiologist yesterday. When he just looked at me, saying nothing, I said, “Well, at least the NHS in the UK is being honest about the vaccines.” People will do what they’re going to do, I just pray that most will wake up!
Here’s the most recent data (March 17, 2022 from page 45) and it is much worse:
There is simply no way to explain this data if the vaccine works as is claimed. In the footnote, they use what is known as a handwaving argument which is speculation based on zero data. For example, they say there could be more cases for vaccinated people because they test more often (really? whereas the data to back that up?).
They can hand-wave all they want and it doesn’t change the facts.
For example, in Santa Clara County they did of freedom of information act request and found that vaccinated and unvaccinated first responders had effectively the same rate of infections. In other words, it wasn’t protecting people where I live either.
What is most telling are the huge population studies, for example, in 145 countries showing that almost without exception, the more you vaccinate, the higher the cases and deaths. Funny, the UK government never cites any studies at all that challenge the narrative. There are plenty and over a dozen are listed in Incriminating Evidence.
We have all been victims of a massive fraud.
But the whole point of mandates was that it would protect you from getting sick so you wouldn’t infect others. Clearly, the mandates make you more likely to get sick. This is opposite what you were told. Everyone should be outraged at this.
The same UK report claims a death benefit, but that’s only if you ignore all the deaths caused by the vaccine. If you include those, it’s negative as well.
In South Korea, COVID cases are through the roof but nearly everyone is vaccinated
Here’s a quote from Alex Berenson’s article:
On Thursday, South Korea reported 600,000 new Covid infections - the equivalent of more than 4 million in the United States. In a single day.
Since they are all vaccinated, how is that possible?
The mRNA shots have negative efficacy against Omicron infection within months - meaning that vaccinated people are more likely to become infected. Data from Canada, Britain, Scotland, the United States, and other countries all agree on this point. I’m not sure anyone serious even argues it anymore.
In New Zealand, for example, unvaccinated people now have even lower infection rates than those who have received boosters:
Why the deception?
One reader asked “why would our authorities mislead us?” The answer is simple: everyone believed Tony Fauci when he chose to focus on the vaccine and completely discredit early treatment. At that point, it was too big to fail since every world leader supported the vaccine. When the data showed the vaccine was unsafe and ineffective (the data showed it killed over 100,000 Americans), they had to cover up their mistake or nobody would ever trust them again. The medical community isn’t speaking up because they will have their licenses revoked. The press won’t say anything because America will never trust them again. Same for Congress, the NIH, CDC, and FDA. The FDA and CDC looked the other way at the safety signals because the vaccine was too big to fail: it HAD to work in order to end the pandemic.