I bet $1M that the virus originated in a lab. Anyone want to bet against me? I didn't think so.
Nobody on earth seriously believes the "natural origin" story. Proof: I bet $1M that it was man-made. Will ANYONE bet against me? Of course not!
Whenever there is money at risk, you quickly find out who has conviction in their beliefs and who does not.
So making an audacious bet is a good way to quantify conviction in a belief and expose fraud.
Guess what folks…there is no conviction in the “natural origin theory.”
Once you ask people to risk capital on their belief, you then can easily see who is telling the truth and who is spreading misinformation.
For example, MIT says I’m a misinformation superspreader. Fine. Accept my bet and let’s see who the superspreader really is! After all, MIT Institute Professor Robert Langer is co-founder of Moderna. He could easily fund the acceptance of the bet.
I want to prove to the world that there isn’t a single person on the planet that seriously believes the two garbage papers published in Science claiming that the SARS-CoV-2 virus came out of nature or this Twitter thread from an “expert.”
I’m willing to bet $1M that the lab origin theory is more likely than the natural origin theory.
All the details for how to accept my bet and terms are listed here.
Will anyone take my bet? Check here to see how many people worldwide have accepted my bet.
So far zero, but I’m really hoping someone will accept it so we can resolve the issue.
The million dollar risk assures that each side will take this seriously and it assures that the outcome will be covered by the mainstream media due to the size of the bet, the fact it is seriously contested with experts on both sides, there is a mutually agreeable panel of unbiased expert judges, and the ramifications of the outcome.
In addition, all the arguments will be recorded for the public to view so even if the judges are biased, the public will clearly see which side is lying and ducking questions. That’s the most important part. We will finally have a public debate so everyone will see who funded the research and the matching sequence to the 2017 Moderna patent (US 9587003). That part will go unchallenged. That’s why nobody will take our bet on the other side. Nobody.
The side pool: A way for you to make money for as little as $100
No matter which way you believe, if you want to have some skin in the game and/or make money on the outcome (since I know many of you are unemployed due to vaccine mandates at your work), the term sheet page explains how you can participate in the side-pool.
You can place a wager on either side: from $100 to $10,000.
You can see here the people who have registered to participate in the side pool and the size of their wager. The side-pool registration is not a legal commitment. You’ll only be called on to participate if someone accepts one of my bets (which appears to be unlikely). At that time, you can decide to pass or play. See the term sheet page for details on the side pool.
The origin of the natural evolution theory
The natural origin theory was created in just 3 days shortly after the outbreak happened to confuse you (watch Chris Martenson’s video which takes you through the email sequence with Fauci and Kristian Anderson). It was created without having any new data!
But this fact check says I’m wrong!
Here’s why you should take my bet: this “fact check” says I’m totally wrong. And so does Moreno Colaiacovo in this Twitter thread.
So you just show the judge the “fact check” and you’re done. What could be easier?
But I know that these “fact checks” are not very reliable. All the fact checkers I know are camera shy. After I got one of them on tape, none of them want to talk to me anymore (since I insist on recording the conversation).
Before you accept the bet, be sure you know the facts
On the other hand, I knew about the fact check before I made the bet, so may I know something they don’t know.
People who want to challenge me should
read this article containing Bancel’s quote:
Read the rootclaim analysis of the lab leak origin
watch this video featuring Richard Fleming
Watch the Chris Martenson’s video
"My scientists are looking into those data to see how accurate they are or not. As I have said before, the hypothesis of an escape from a lab by an accident is possible. … Humans make mistakes."
Moderna is still investigating..
So I’m being perfectly transparent. No tricks. Nobody has challenged rootclaim to win $100K. They have the cheaper bet.
Let me be perfectly clear, I’m only betting the $1M because every single expert I’ve consulted on this says there is no way this came from nature.
I claim that nobody really believes the “natural origin” story. The proof is that nobody will take my $1M.
Moderna could easily put up the funds to challenge me. They should, because their fingerprints are all over the origin of the virus.
Why would they not put up $1M to clear their name? They were asked to explain this a long time ago and all we got was “we’re looking into it.”
If there is nobody who accepts my bet, then all eyes should be on asking Moderna to explain how the 19 nucleotide sequence in their 2015 patents got into the SARS-CoV-2 genome that supposedly came out of “nature.”
That will be fun to watch. The other side will need to explain that one. And maybe we’ll finally get the answer they have been avoiding.
Please share this post on social media
Please share this on social media!
With enough exposure of this bet, we’re bound to find someone brave enough to bet against me so we can resolve this important issue.
There are now 13 different bets listed on the term sheet. If you think the virus doesn't exist or any other such nonsense, you should accept one of the bets and let's resolve the issue.
But it's clear that NOBODY has any conviction for any of these beliefs as you can see from the bet acceptances and the side bets (which are all consistent with my beliefs). The link for the term sheet is in the article. Please stop claiming the virus doesn't exist if you are not willing to demonstrate your commitment by accepting my bet or making a commitment in the side-pool. thanks.
Michael Yeadon could use the money.
It looks like Mike agrees with me that SARS CoV-2 was pieced together on genbank under instructions to find the nearest bat to match it to. That's how they came up with RaTG13. I remember the article that laid out the method used in obtaining the genetic links to RaTG13.
Mike suspects nothing leaked from a lab, or that it wasn't causing what's been called COVID.
It's like I've been harping on since 2019 when the virus was first announced. This was a psyop to get people to take transhuman, depopulation shots. As Mike says, COVID is just one part of a broad effort to usher in the NWO.
And here's the motive from the lips of Peter Daszak and Anthony Fauci.
Peter Daszak said at the National Academies for Science in 2015, and published in 2016:
"…until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis … we need to increase public understanding of the need for [medical countermeasures] such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process."
A video emerged where Fauci and others planned for a “Universal mRNA Flu Vaccine” which became the “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine” because people were not afraid enough of the flu virus.
Remember, according to a social security whistleblower who grabbed copies of the U.S. Deaths master file, death by all causes remained unchanged by the end of 2019 - late 2020. I have read the CDC went back and altered that data to conceal that truth. I checked the reports when they first came out, the deaths were not statistically different from the 10 year average," as I recall.
The Chinese people dropping dead in Wuhan appeared to be staged. Doctors were failing to treat people with bacterial pneumonia. Mike found during 2020-2021, 50% of the antibiotics needed for bacterial pneumonia cases were used, meaning a lot of doctors simply were not treating it. We already know about deadly hospital protocols, like sending people home with respiratory distress, and telling them to come back when they're near death, but doing nothing to help them. Mike said these cases were easy to treat. He cites numerous doctors who developed successful protocols.
This is a great segment on by Michael Yeadon. Mike has lost family and friends due to his enlightenment about COVID. I really feel bad for the guy. He's doing his best to wake people up to the truth, that we're all going to lose our freedom if we don't start waking people up and doing something about it.