Using relative event rates, we can get a very accurate estimate on important things like the number of people killed by the COVID vaccine by comparing rates with know with rates we don't know
I always have difficulty with surveys that ask if someone died of covid or died from the vaccine, because it's not always clear what someone died of. I have a close family member who, according to their death certificate, died "of covid," but in reality thier symptoms resembled a vaccine injury more than covid. However this was a few months after getting the vaccine, and they WERE diagnosed with covid, so can I really say for sure that they died of a vaccine injury? I would feel much better answering questions like, "Do you have a family member who died WITH covid?" "Do you have a family member who died after getting the vaccine?" and "Do you have a family member whose death MAY have been caused by the vaccine?" As it is I feel like I can't answer the second question honestly no matter what I put.
Do not know how familiar anyone is with Dr. Zelenko…he is a warrior and has strength beyond belief, he needs our prayers, failing health, please PRAY for him
Thank you both. Very interesting, if highly technical. I am in the process of learning the vocabulary so as to have even a minor chance of grasping the bio-tech concepts/processes.
The woman, with whom I've lived for 23 years, was hospitalized (Oct 1st, 2021) with "covid pneumonia", at a Cleveland Clinic facility. After a month in the hospital and two weeks on a ventilator, she died. (Based on my understanding of hospital protocol for Covid, I believe that it was an iatrogenic death.)
Here are the numbers for the week from VAERS. Your blood should boil over this! Especially the backlog and the missing reports:
1,268,006 total reports.
28,141 reports of death.
52,299 reports of permanent disability.
Still a backlog of over 100,000 reports missing or yet to be processed.
We are 17 months into the most disastrous vaccine campaign in U.S. history -- 583 million shots administered with negative efficacy that come with unprecedented harms. No one at FDA, CDC, nor in our political system seems to have the mental capacity to understand what they have wrought.
Thank you for sharing the Red Box Report with others.
So, after going so long without knowing an acquaintance getting a vax reaction in months, just found out my neighbour's daughter, in her 40s, just suffered a severe vax reaction from the booster.
She's lost all feeling from her waist down. She's lost the ability to walk freely, and is re-learning with therapy and a walker. This is Victoria BC. Quietly, the doctors have admitted its a vax injury, despite that being grounds for suspension from the BC College of Doctors!
Neighbours have been staunch vaxxers, and our once great relationship has been strained, but we havent barked at each other either, respect has been maintained, and we're slowly building it back up. Trouble is, if I mentioned the probability of Vax injuries months ago, they would have gone full Karen. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
My sister has just been diagnosed with malignant colorectal cancer. She has has two other primary cases of cancer in her life, so I don't know if this is causally related or can be correlated with her being jabbed 3 times. The tumor is large. We do not know the stage of cancer yet or her prognosis. I can't help but wonder if the "vaccine" hurt her already weakened immune system and accelerated the growth of an existing cancer cell that "lived" in her body. Sent two surveys 1) I chose none of the above on both sections the 2nd one I selected 'sibling seriously injured by vaccine." Good luck with this endeavor.
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 1 or 2 MONTHS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
Let's look at the death data (only from covid-19) for those greater than 80 years of age, from week 3, 2022 (the fraud) onwards:
The following table has 4 columns. The first lists the period.
Column A is deaths among those vaccinated per 100,000
Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column C is Column B minus Column A; which is the number of deaths saved/lost due to the vaccines.
Period A B C (covid-19 deaths per 100,000)
week03 39 309 => the vaccines save 270 deaths per 100,000
week04 57 322 => the vaccines save 265 deaths per 100,000
week05 78 326 => the vaccines save 248 deaths per 100,000
week06 103 324 => the vaccines save 221 deaths per 100,000
week07 114 280 => the vaccines save 165 deaths per 100,000
week08 120 243 => the vaccines save 124 deaths per 100,000
week09 120 190 => the vaccines save 70 deaths per 100,000
week10 110 152 => the vaccines save 42 deaths per 100,000
week11 101 141 => the vaccines save 40 deaths per 100,000
week12 90 134 => the vaccines save 44 deaths per 100,000
week13 84 122 => the vaccines save 37 deaths per 100,000
week14............. they suddenly decided to stop publishing the data.
I WONDER WHY?
The data is from the United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
I must emphasize that the above data only records deaths due to covid-19. It does not record any deaths due to adverse reactions to the vaccines.
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide an excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
The relevant data from the reports can be found in the following PDF:
Previously, this very data was used to justify the vaccine mandates. The argument was that the vaccines are saving more than they are killing. This is no longer true. What is now true, is that; The vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Steve, this is OT but I had an idea. How about arranging to provide the drugs for the Fareed & Tyson protocol to North Korea? If you'll set up a crowdfund for this, I'm in for $500.
Of course, you'll somehow have to persuade the NK authorities — possibly Kim himself — to accept them. Maybe explaining about the outrage that will be generated toward the government in the US, once the drugs are seen to work, will help.
Does anyone remember where was the information about how many thousands/hundreds of thousand hospitals in different states have been getting for each "covid" death? There was a table/comparison for each state. I think it was published in this substack in earlier posts or other similar substacks.
If anyone has the link, please post it here. Thanks.
This seems to be only 2 questions...?
Not sure it matters, Steve, but a few grammatical errors on this one.
I always have difficulty with surveys that ask if someone died of covid or died from the vaccine, because it's not always clear what someone died of. I have a close family member who, according to their death certificate, died "of covid," but in reality thier symptoms resembled a vaccine injury more than covid. However this was a few months after getting the vaccine, and they WERE diagnosed with covid, so can I really say for sure that they died of a vaccine injury? I would feel much better answering questions like, "Do you have a family member who died WITH covid?" "Do you have a family member who died after getting the vaccine?" and "Do you have a family member whose death MAY have been caused by the vaccine?" As it is I feel like I can't answer the second question honestly no matter what I put.
He is a hero, thank you to anyone and everyone who prays for him
Do not know how familiar anyone is with Dr. Zelenko…he is a warrior and has strength beyond belief, he needs our prayers, failing health, please PRAY for him
🅁🄸🄳🄳🄻🄴
T̳h̳e̳ ̳T̳h̳r̳e̳e̳ ̳A̳'̳s̳. What are Ⓐgendas, Ⓐntagonists & Ⓐuto-Immunity-Deficiency-Syndrome(s)?
𝗔𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿 = components
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/anthony-s-fauci
Thank you both. Very interesting, if highly technical. I am in the process of learning the vocabulary so as to have even a minor chance of grasping the bio-tech concepts/processes.
Your survey didn't cover this:
The woman, with whom I've lived for 23 years, was hospitalized (Oct 1st, 2021) with "covid pneumonia", at a Cleveland Clinic facility. After a month in the hospital and two weeks on a ventilator, she died. (Based on my understanding of hospital protocol for Covid, I believe that it was an iatrogenic death.)
Here is the latest Red Box report from OpenVAERS
This just in from OpenVAERS: https://openvaers.com/?idU=1
Here are the numbers for the week from VAERS. Your blood should boil over this! Especially the backlog and the missing reports:
1,268,006 total reports.
28,141 reports of death.
52,299 reports of permanent disability.
Still a backlog of over 100,000 reports missing or yet to be processed.
We are 17 months into the most disastrous vaccine campaign in U.S. history -- 583 million shots administered with negative efficacy that come with unprecedented harms. No one at FDA, CDC, nor in our political system seems to have the mental capacity to understand what they have wrought.
Thank you for sharing the Red Box Report with others.
The OpenVAERS Team
So, after going so long without knowing an acquaintance getting a vax reaction in months, just found out my neighbour's daughter, in her 40s, just suffered a severe vax reaction from the booster.
She's lost all feeling from her waist down. She's lost the ability to walk freely, and is re-learning with therapy and a walker. This is Victoria BC. Quietly, the doctors have admitted its a vax injury, despite that being grounds for suspension from the BC College of Doctors!
Neighbours have been staunch vaxxers, and our once great relationship has been strained, but we havent barked at each other either, respect has been maintained, and we're slowly building it back up. Trouble is, if I mentioned the probability of Vax injuries months ago, they would have gone full Karen. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
hopefully anyone can see it A.S.A.P:
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/05/21/vaers-reports-deleted.aspx
Stewpeters.com confirm massive deletions of deaths inside of VAERS reports!!!! Thus this survey is getting even more precious!
My sister has just been diagnosed with malignant colorectal cancer. She has has two other primary cases of cancer in her life, so I don't know if this is causally related or can be correlated with her being jabbed 3 times. The tumor is large. We do not know the stage of cancer yet or her prognosis. I can't help but wonder if the "vaccine" hurt her already weakened immune system and accelerated the growth of an existing cancer cell that "lived" in her body. Sent two surveys 1) I chose none of the above on both sections the 2nd one I selected 'sibling seriously injured by vaccine." Good luck with this endeavor.
Shared on FB, Twit, and Truth Social!
YEAH; STILL LOOKING FOR CONSTRUCTIVE COMMENT ON THIS.
PROOF THAT THE "VACCINES" INCREASE SICKNESS AND DEATH.
EVEN IN THOSE OVER EIGHTY YEARS OLD.
Read about it here:
http://www.preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 1 or 2 MONTHS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
Let's look at the death data (only from covid-19) for those greater than 80 years of age, from week 3, 2022 (the fraud) onwards:
The following table has 4 columns. The first lists the period.
Column A is deaths among those vaccinated per 100,000
Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column C is Column B minus Column A; which is the number of deaths saved/lost due to the vaccines.
Period A B C (covid-19 deaths per 100,000)
week03 39 309 => the vaccines save 270 deaths per 100,000
week04 57 322 => the vaccines save 265 deaths per 100,000
week05 78 326 => the vaccines save 248 deaths per 100,000
week06 103 324 => the vaccines save 221 deaths per 100,000
week07 114 280 => the vaccines save 165 deaths per 100,000
week08 120 243 => the vaccines save 124 deaths per 100,000
week09 120 190 => the vaccines save 70 deaths per 100,000
week10 110 152 => the vaccines save 42 deaths per 100,000
week11 101 141 => the vaccines save 40 deaths per 100,000
week12 90 134 => the vaccines save 44 deaths per 100,000
week13 84 122 => the vaccines save 37 deaths per 100,000
week14............. they suddenly decided to stop publishing the data.
I WONDER WHY?
The data is from the United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Image/Graph http://www.preearth.net/images/deaths-caused-saved-by-vaccines.png
I must emphasize that the above data only records deaths due to covid-19. It does not record any deaths due to adverse reactions to the vaccines.
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide an excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
The relevant data from the reports can be found in the following PDF:
http://www.preearth.net/pdfs/the-vaccines-are-killing-you.pdf
Previously, this very data was used to justify the vaccine mandates. The argument was that the vaccines are saving more than they are killing. This is no longer true. What is now true, is that; The vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Steve, this is OT but I had an idea. How about arranging to provide the drugs for the Fareed & Tyson protocol to North Korea? If you'll set up a crowdfund for this, I'm in for $500.
Of course, you'll somehow have to persuade the NK authorities — possibly Kim himself — to accept them. Maybe explaining about the outrage that will be generated toward the government in the US, once the drugs are seen to work, will help.
Does anyone remember where was the information about how many thousands/hundreds of thousand hospitals in different states have been getting for each "covid" death? There was a table/comparison for each state. I think it was published in this substack in earlier posts or other similar substacks.
If anyone has the link, please post it here. Thanks.