Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Share this post
Negative vaccine efficacy example in the UK
stevekirsch.substack.com

Negative vaccine efficacy example in the UK

This is hard to explain. I suggest this can be a good "conversation starter" with those who believe that the vaccines are effective.

Steve Kirsch
Feb 8
480
322
Share this post
Negative vaccine efficacy example in the UK
stevekirsch.substack.com

Summary

This example shows that triple vaccinated people in the UK are more likely to be hospitalized, not less likely. In other words, the vaccines are doing the opposite of what the health authorities claimed. Mandating vaccination is actually making the problem worse, not better.

The FOIA request

Consider the following FOIA request from Feb 3, 2022:

Image

Now consider the following stats:

Image

So we have 130/182 = 71% of the patients in the hospital are triple vaccinated.

But only 45% of the public is triple vaccinated.

Negative efficacy

If the vaccines worked, we’d see that fewer than 45% of the patients are triple vaccinated. Instead, we see the opposite.

In other words, not only are the vaccines not working, but they are actually making it more likely you will be infected. Whoops.

UK Government data confirms negative efficacy

Reminds me of this chart showing similar negative vaccine efficacy.

The only question remains: when will people wake up?

322
Share this post
Negative vaccine efficacy example in the UK
stevekirsch.substack.com
322 Comments

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

Tom Hogan
Mar 18

We need to know what percent of each age group are vaccinated and what percent are in the waiting period.

Funny how the authorities aren't giving us this info.

Expand full comment
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse
Sharon sivori
Feb 14

Let me tell you something, I have master's +++ so don't tell me I don't have the ability to anything, because your stupidly wrong! I am still waiting for what science you disagreed with or can't you tell what is the difference between facts and science???? I stated facts from Pfizer, so sorry you don't agree, that is fine, but don't call what I wrote as science. You want a go at science, ok! You wear a mask?

Expand full comment
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse
1 reply
320 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Steve Kirsch
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing