184 Comments

Well I am glad all the crap is coming out about Pfizer now in FOIA! It lets us know all their dirty secrets and there are many. They knew this shot was a killer and a disabler before it came out. They (Pfizer knew of over 1291 severe reactions) before the shot came out, they just didn't bother to tell anyone! On that fact alone that is a basis for MEDICAL FRAUD!! So now Pfizer can be sued for all the billions that they made, because the KNOWINGLY let go of an UNSAFE DRUG!!!

Expand full comment

The hive mind.

Expand full comment

I truly believe most people think they are safe. Even doctors. Both my sisters had issues post jab (they got it to travel early on) and neither one connects the dots. I know a few others who did connect the dots, but their doctors treated them like they were crazy. Actually I do think many doctors MUST know something is going on simply from exposure to so many injured patients. But the average American doesn’t know or care. I hope I’m wrong.

Expand full comment

Phew, for a second there I thought the "I make more then $12,000 a month..." person wasn't going to post.

Expand full comment

I wonder how many reporters are brainwashed vs. coerced into the Mass Formation. Would be interesting to know.

Expand full comment

But how will news reporters earn a living after they get fired for doing an interview with you? I think it’s probably an even split between people worried about loosing their career and those who are actually brainwashed into believing that they are doing the right thing. Big pharma has so much control over media, medicine, politicians and public health agencies because they simply make so much money, they can use that money to buy whatever influence benefits them. They are a, if not the, major source of revenue for hospitals, the FDA, medical schools, medical journals, campaigns, media etc. And why do they make so much money? Because our population is increasingly unwell.

Going at them from a legal standpoint is one way to try and deal with it, although it’s obviously not very effective, as evidenced by their legal history. Another way to combat big pharma (the more effective but also more difficult), would be for the majority of people to take back their health so that they no longer have any need or desire to use big pharma’s products. If we all stopped buying processed food and started consuming foods that promote health and reduced the amount of environmental toxins around us (we are exposed to so many chemicals and heavy metals just in cleaning and grooming products alone!), we would not be in this mess. It’s the only way to end this at the roots. The public health agencies are virtually worthless and are actually doing harm, obviously. People have to stop relying on them. Almost all health measures are sliding backwards with each generation, and fast. As much as I wish doctors, scientists, media reporters etc. would have a backbone, I believe the true responsibility lies within the public at large to stop trying to make someone else responsible for our health and safety. The people who didn’t fall for this are often people who are tuned in to what truly brings about health and vitality and they know that it doesn’t come from the end of a syringe or in a prescription. There will be more and more “pandemics” in the future and people will keep falling for it as long as they do not understand that their health is ultimately their responsibility. Just my two cents.

Expand full comment

PCR TEST INVENTOR SAID IT SHOULD NEVER BE USED TO TRY TO IDENTIFY DISEASE

The epidemic that wasn’t: In 2006, doctors used PCR testing to cause mass hysteria over a “whooping cough” outbreak that didn’t even exist

"It flew under most people’s radar at the time, but 15 years ago there was an alleged whooping cough epidemic that the medical industry warned was a major threat. The only problem is that it did not actually exist, having been the product of false PCR testing.

The same fraudulent tests being used today to identify the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) were also used in 2006 to pinpoint a fake whooping cough epidemic that scared a whole lot of health care workers into panicking, taking pharmaceutical drugs and getting injected with vaccines (sound familiar?).

The New York Times reported that nearly 1,000 health care workers at a hospital in Lebanon, N.H., tested “positive” using the PCR tests, resulting in them being furloughed from work. They were administered antibiotics and injected with chemicals, only to have the whole thing be blown open as a hoax eight months later.

“… health care workers were dumbfounded to receive an e-mail message from the hospital administration informing them that the whole thing was a false alarm,” the Times reported in 2007 about the embarrassing incident.

“Not a single case of whooping cough was confirmed with the definitive test, growing the bacterium, Bordetella pertussis, in the laboratory. Instead, it appears the health care workers probably were afflicted with ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.

PCR test inventor said it should never be used to try to identify disease

How could it be that people were mistakenly diagnosed with whooping cough when all they really had was the common cold? The answer is simple: PCR tests are not accurate and their results can easily be manipulated to push a narrative.

The only thing PCR tests do is magnify DNA particles in a sample until they become visible. Depending on how they are calibrated, they can pick up almost anything – even things that do not exist." Read More

https://weirdsciencenews.com/2021-12-09-2006-doctors-pcr-mass-hysteria-whooping-cough.html#

Expand full comment

Too bad Karl Popper didn’t specifically apply his ideas on science to medicine. If he had, maybe he’d have invented a rule: If the experts will not defend their policies, beliefs, or edicts, all those should be considered morally, intellectually and legally null & void. Maybe, with a little more testosterone & caffeine, he’d have recommended that such bogus authorities be arrested, tarred & feathered.

Expand full comment

I don't think attacking them, as a whole, is the correct tactic.

I will come to you, personally, to ask why you won't look for and present facts. But, I won't attack the entire construct in which I find you.

Expand full comment

We all know why- massive brainwashing that is very effective. So effective they think they still have independent rational thoughts.

Expand full comment

On 6-15-2022 FDA's VRBPAC meeting will discuss expanding EUA for Pfizer's COVID jab to 6-month old infants up to 5-years of age little helpless children. Stand for Health Freedom in only turning in comments they receive through June 7. But comments could be sent directly to this committee and its members, if somebody looks up the email info.

Expand full comment

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/WhctKKXXJxWsmgNwPpdSjgSXWwDnKDsWNlVHrWVGPtjrcZNSrDCcdfndMmnThnFNnLFgPBl

Comments are being accepted through June 7th by this health freedom group to turn into the FDA on why the youngest children should not be COVID-19 vaccinated. They will turn in what you write. This is the time for Steve's team to repeat his amazingly rational work.

Expand full comment

Newspaper "reporters" are just shills for pharma and the elites that own all of these news sources but sheeple are too damned stupid to see this and they keep being led to the slaughter house, in this case, the jabs.

Expand full comment

"Not a single newspaper reporter in America who tells you "the food in your supermarket is safe" is telling you the truth"

I can say that about a dozens of things!

Expand full comment