132 Comments

Hi the short URL code is not working.

Expand full comment

This kind of sneakyness is immoral and pathetic. Friends are friends for many reasons. you lose respect doing this. Elitism is typical of educated types. Don't lose lose mine

Expand full comment

Two more questions to ask is…

1) “Do you know anyone in remission of cancer and the cancer return after January 2021?”

2) “Were they vaccinated or unvaccinated?

Expand full comment

Really thoughtful survey. May I suggest that you could add the following question. "How many people do you personally know who have been vaccinated and then diagnosed for cancer? Options could range from (0,1,2,3, more than 3)

Expand full comment

Every time I have posted something expose related on Facebook it gets ignored. No one wants to fill out surveys of this nature that I know. Haven't you heard?--Facebook has been deleting accounts of "misinformation" spreaders.....

Expand full comment

Speaking of surveys, I created mine (it's actually in a form of a quiz) not so much to see what's going on but to educate and offer a red pill. But the quiz is not just for those who took the blue - It's for both extreme sides, as I do believe extremes are unhealthy. Check it out:

https://in4bit.com/quiz

I don't have a "special code" but there is a section for feedback - I'd really appreciate your comments! And I did post it on LinkedIn, but not on Fakebook (I just don't go there)

Expand full comment

The NYT has run perhaps its WORST piece ever, pure garbage, and I suspect it was motivated in part because so many people are asking more questions not only about covid shots, but all of them. All of the "experts" quoted are vaccine-church fanatics, and the article never gets specific about the so-called "misinformation;" NYT readership is left wing and the article claims that people are getting their "misinformation" from right-wing/NRA affiliated websites.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/25/magazine/anti-vaccine-movement.html?referringSource=articleShare

Never ever mentions that vaccine makers are free from liability and have made billions from these shots. Shameful. I think it's worth a careful takedown on this substack.

Expand full comment

Well, the spike protein does infiltrate the brain???? There are some people that just will not wake up!

Expand full comment

Hey Steve, interesting approach! I do need to ask you if you can remember the conversation you had with two doctors recently.. One of them said something that I couldn’t understand it but he mentioned something about a woman’s uterus lining?! Its quite possible that this hits home regarding myself! Sorry to bug you!

Expand full comment

I almost forget I still had twitter - I only used it for recipe contests! Posted.

Expand full comment

I don't know how useful these surveys are, other than showing what certain groups think or feel. That is not going to change the actions of the tyrants or red pill the public. What we need is are facts and statistical analysis widely disemminated.

Expand full comment

So... results to date pretty much reflect Milgram's experiment, which asked teachers to inflict a supposedly high dosage electric shock on students deemed deserving of it by an authority... Here is the interesting bit that Milgram found:-

Participants were debriefed after the experiment and showed much relief at finding they had not harmed the student. One cried from emotion when he saw the student alive, and explained that he thought he had killed him. But what was different about those who obeyed and those who rebelled? Milgram divided participants into three categories:

Obeyed but justified themselves. Some obedient participants gave up responsibility for their actions, blaming the experimenter. If anything had happened to the learner, they reasoned, it would have been the experimenter�s fault. Others had transferred the blame to the learner: "He was so stupid and stubborn he deserved to be shocked."

Obeyed but blamed themselves. Others felt badly about what they had done and were quite harsh on themselves. Members of this group would, perhaps, be more likely to challenge authority if confronted with a similar situation in the future.

Rebelled. Finally, rebellious subjects questioned the authority of the experimenter and argued there was a greater ethical imperative calling for the protection of the learner over the needs of the experimenter. Some of these individuals felt they were accountable to a higher authority.

Why were those who challenged authority in the minority? So entrenched is obedience it may void personal codes of conduct.

The Dems/Globalists have spent so much time and resources taking over all levels of our education, political and public service systems for the express purpose of inculcating generational "obedience" mindsets into citizens around the World. Indeed, Klaus Schwab tells us in his book that of the 500 million subjects left alive after they have completed their genocide, 300 million will be Chinese or Japanese, because those two cultures are the most "obedient"....

Which begs the obvious conclusion - BLUE, not "orange" is the new black - deep, dark, delusional, putrid, rotting BLACK. Let's snatch as many from the fire as we can folks...

Captain Steve, we are on board and following. Back to you for guidance and updates...

Expand full comment

How would I go about building a survey to see how many jabbed people are getting reinfected vs. unjabbed? That is the research question that blows up the “effective” narrative, so It’ll never get done by the establishment. So it’s up to us to do it!

Expand full comment

Why do you never post anti vax on FB? Just curious. I yell it at the top of my lungs over FB.

Expand full comment

steve, you're too late- I don't have any blue pilled friends left to send this to.

Expand full comment

I also heard someone at The Lancet wants to investigate how covid started?maybe the tide is turning. We have to keep getting the word out!

Expand full comment