Our latest poll: Vax is 2X deadlier than virus
Our latest poll: Vax is 2X deadlier than virus
More than 2X as many people died from the vaccine as from COVID. This is why mainstream media will never do their own polls.
A new polling company, but the results are still the same
We’ve been using Pollfish for our previous user surveys. Pollfish picks the people who answer. The results have been devastating for the vaccine.
So we wanted to make sure this wasn’t a fluke or a bad audience sample.
So we picked another polling firm. The audience is picked by them.
Our latest poll
Our latest poll is from PeopleFish.
It shows what we’ve been saying:
More than twice as many people died from the vaccine as from COVID.
See these questions:
Did any members of your household die from the COVID vaccine? A: 49
Did any of your household members die from having a COVID infection? A: 21
That is really stunning and is consistent with earlier polling.
This is embarrassing for the vaccine. That’s why only misinformation spreaders like me do these polls.
Pfizer said in the clinical trials, there were fewer serious adverse events in the placebo group than in the vaccine. Check out paragraph 7 in this article.
So their claims aren’t backed up by VAERS or our polls.
Someone is lying to you. Big time.
Out of 523 households, 49 had someone who died from the vaccine, but only 21 died from COVID.
11% of the people we poll were vaccine injured. That translates to over 20 million vaccine injured people.
.
Different third party survey company and audience, but same result as before! How can you explain how that can happen?
Summary
I wanted you to know how deadly the vaccines are.
These results are why the mainstream media will never commission a study like this.
Perhaps you can ask your member of Congress why we are getting such serious safety data in objecting outreach sampling polls like this one?
I’d love to know what is going on if it isn’t the vaccines.
It looks like 'household' is intended to be the sample unit for the second round of questions. It seems a bit of numeric data might be handy via replacing size classes with 'how many folks in your household'. To crosscheck the answers you get from using '120.000.000 US households'. Although classes pretty tight the 8+ might be anything, eg folks interpreting to mean 'folks for which I claim I would know if vaccine injured or dead'. Numeric would sort that out.
The 3/4 who had a covid death and thought the medical treatment contributed seems to be interpretable as to the 'selection bias' or whatever term is used to describe bias due to who is attracted to and answers the poll. What proportion thought the medical treatment was dangerous amongst those who had vaccines but no vaccine injuries?
Is there a way to see 'aborted' surveys? Does that have any use?
What happens if you strip the questions down to say 6 questions or so? Does the proportion of deaths worked as a proportion of the population start to come down?
"selection bias" or whatever that is in poll design seems would be the weakest point of this data. Repeat polls are showing similar results so you are getting some view of things consistently, but the view is not applicable to population. High precision low accuracy I would guess.
Excellent initiative and thank you for doing all this.
Is there anyone who has or how do I FOIA request previous years SADS deaths? SADS.org used to have it on their site but strangely it's missing.🤔