Proof of malicious manipulation of data to support their agenda
I ran a poll on rates of autism before and after a vaccine appointment. I suggested Gorski run it himself. Instead, it appears he had his followers manipulate my poll. This shows how corrupt they are.
The truth is now so bad for them that they have to stoop to malicious data manipulation techniques.
I posted this poll and checked 51 minutes later on the votes and saw a 5:1 odds ratio that vaccines cause autism. This was nearly exactly as I predicted.
Then I suggested Gorski run his own poll.
I just checked on the poll 10 hours after I sent Gorski that message.
Look at the results now!
They flipped it from the vaccine causing autism to the vaccine being the magical cure for autism. This never happens in a poll unless it is being gamed.
Look at my poll now:
This is a stunning reversal from a 5:1 odds ratio (which later went to 6:1) to a 1:2 odds ratio. Basically, people who would normally have no child with autism lied and voted for the first choice so it showed the vaccines are now beneficial.
My polls weren’t gamed in the past.
Today, the opposition is now fielding armies of robot voters to manipulate the truth to support their narrative.
This shows you first hand how low these people will stoop in order to manipulate results that are counter narrative.
If Gorski was not involved in this manipulation, he’d call this out as corrupt behavior. I
I’m going to give him a chance to do that. If he doesn’t, everyone will know that he is a supporter of malicious data manipulation.
The gaslighting that goes on
So you’ll see people claiming that more votes shift the odds. Sure, it will shift it to the truth. After 300 votes on a poll, the results are very stable. This one was immediately obvious.
Note that the peer reviewed scientific literature says vaccines are linked to higher rates of autism. All the standard excuses don’t work.
And our Amish friends would have higher rates of autism than the US as a whole. But the rate of autism is zero among the Amish.
Furthermore, SkepticalRaptor, made this post claiming all these studies showed no effect; that the vaccines do nothing. So according to SkepticalRaptor and Gorski, there would be an EVEN odds (i.e., 1:1).
These polls should move to the truth so if they are right, it would move to 1:1 worst case. It cannot move to 1:2. That is VERY CLEAR scientific corruption.
So anyone who says more votes caused the results to shift to 1:2 is either naive, a liar, or is deliberately gaslighting you.
After I published this article, and notified them of the gaming, the poll results were AGAIN gamed to support THEIR narrative
After I wrote my article calling them out and pointing out the poll results had to be gamed because it didn’t support THEIR narrative, they tried to game it back in the OTHER direction back to neutral (which supports their narrative). But they still didn’t game it back to neutral.
Such dramatic swings never happen in polls. After a few hundred votes, things are very stable. So they game it one way, then discover they screwed up, and game it back to support their narrative. Super corrupt.
The opposition is now a lot more sophisticated and will deliberately manipulate poll results to support their agenda.
Anyone doing polling should be aware of this.
If Gorski, SkepticalRaptor, and Susan Oliver’s dog Cindy Oliver don’t speak out against manipulation, it will be obvious to all that they are on the side of corruption rather than truth.
What do you think they will do?
I anticipated that the poll would be gamed when you published the original article. Not surprising and I am unsure what one can do to prevent it.
One thing's for sure, you did get a response. As a buddy used to say, "When they're picking on you at least they're leaving someone else alone." : )