44 Comments
author

this is still being edited and isn't pushed yet.

I wanted to get this out and I'll update the article later today to fix typos, add links, etc.

let me know anything i missed

Expand full comment

I don't understand why Kim Iversen can't have you on her show. She could just post the whole show on Rumble and post only a self-censored teaser on YouTube. Problem solved.

Expand full comment
Aug 21, 2022·edited Aug 21, 2022

Wow! I never thought I would’ve lived to see this type of censorship, book burning or the fruition of “thought crimes“ being punished (like doctors getting their license taken away for speaking truth or people loosing their jobs for refusing an injection or people being banned from platforms for expressing thoughts, experiences or perspectives) but here we are. I thought we had advanced past that type of tyranny by the ruling class. Some people’s are just cool with it. I guess they’ve not read history to know that this is not a good sign of things to come. This is scary stuff.

Incidentally, I subscribe to a website from the U.K., I think, and it’s basically a platform that just puts a wide variety of clips out of anyone questioning the whole covid narrative. It’s called brand new tube. I believe it was created in response to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other media’s censorship. It’s an amazing resource. There’s some junk, of course, but many gems too.

Anyway, about a week ago, the link started directing people to a porn site. Then a day or two later, I get this incredibly creepy email that’s all about how horrible this website is (Brand new tube) because it allowed itself to be hacked. And it goes on to say that brand new tube is horrible because they also censor words (screening out porn and other garbage no doubt). And, they explain that brand new tube is terrible because they have the gal to demonize the WEF and the NWO. In this email they go on to state my username, my email, my IP address and that they know I’m a male (even though “girl” is literally a part of my username). It’s bizarre to say the least.

So the message boiled down is that the hackers are doing me a favor by hacking this low-life information outlet and that if I know what’s good for me, I’ll keep to safer sources of new and information. The hackers are the heroes saving me from bad people who share bad thoughts. How dumb would anyone have to be to swallow this garbage?

Basically, I assume that they (does the U.K. have a version of CIA?) couldn’t legally shut down the website so they decided to hack it and try to make the website creators look like bad guys, which I’m guessing no one who frequents Brand New Tube would fall for.

I knew that they were censoring on platforms that were in agreement with pushing the narrative, like FOX and CNN and YouTube, but this is clearly a new tactic for trying to get rid of information getting out to the resistance by people who haven’t been bought out. This feels unreal. Nearly every prediction made about how bad things were going to get early on in the “pandemic” is slowly but surely coming to pass.

If they shut down independent media, how can we resist? It’s a very sobering thought.

Expand full comment

PJ O'Rourke wrote the seminal book on Washington DC called ,"The Parliament of Whores". After reading your encounter with Fox et al, the network, C-suite, and ALL of the media people including those that are quite conservative are nothing but paid off prostitutes.

Expand full comment

It is interesting that the truth about this evil leaks everywhere...

My #1 clue into this whole evil scam was when all flu patients became covid19 in all 3 Toronto hospitals I was affiliated with.

#2 clue came from Israel when they agreed to become the exclusive lab rats for PharMafia P-Nazi-er. Not allowed to report negative side effects for 10 years. Another holocaust?

3# clue came when the Vaccine Nazis proclaimed the vaccshits are 95-100 % effective using relative risk reduction and proclaiming it as the absolute risk reduction using the main stream media to trick all 99.9999 naive to believe it...

# 4 they went after organized religion..

Expand full comment

Steve, I just came across this fact-choker defamation of you and am thinking you should take on Politifact in addition to Media Matters :-)

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/dec/21/steve-kirsch/contorted-claim-children-killed-covid-19-vaccines-/

Expand full comment

https://harald-walach.info/2022/08/16/why-people-in-germany-get-vaccinated/

Another poll confirming your and the 2 German Krankenkassen's data: 16% of respondents had serious side effects.

And: those that were vaxx-hesitant initially have become the most ardent believers with succumbing to the shot. Cognitive dissonance textbook example.

Expand full comment

Each time we mention Media Matters, we should call them Pharmedia Matters

Expand full comment

UK's independent GB News are doing investigations into illness and deaths caused but the vaccines....

Expand full comment

British press still refusing to discuss the escalating vaccine deaths. Now blaming lockdowns for deaths to avoid the word vaccine-injuries....

Today's article:

"Effects of lockdown could be causing more deaths than Covid: Fears rise over silent health crisis as ONS records nearly 10,000 more deaths than the five-year average - none of which are linked to the virus - in the last two months"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11125573/Effects-lockdown-causing-deaths-Covid.html

Expand full comment

I'm surprised it's not illegal for the media to sign contracts with the government or anyone like that, i.e. to tell only one side of a story. Actually, I imagine it probably is illegal. The government doesn't seem to have any problem with committing illegal acts these days.

Expand full comment

This is EXACTLY why I do a podcast. It doesn't get censored. Ever since you shared my commentary it has completely taken off (these are the rankings in the category "News Commentary"):

- #11 Saudi Arabia

- #60 Germany

- #105 Ireland

- #145 Belgium

- #173 Great Britain

- #184 Canada

- #186 USA

- #249 Singapore

I don't have an audience like Kim Iverson does (yet!), but it's something! You have a standing, open invitation if you want to share your incredible wealth of knowledge with my audience. I'd really enjoy to have you and anyone else in this fight of "telling the truth"! I don't have a pitch because I don't do that, but I will say that your voice should be heard by as many people who are willing to simply listen. Hope you will consider it! :)

Expand full comment

@Steve. You said "I can’t appear on her show because it’s on YouTube. YouTube would immediately ban her channel and cut off all payments for violation of their terms of service. People who tell the truth are not permitted on YouTube. Every time I try, my video lasts for about 10 minutes and 15 views before it is taken down."

Why don't you try Peggy Hall's tactic? Use euphemisms. She calls Covid cooties, as an example. I haven't taken the time to write down her euphemisms. I just remember that one and she calls public servants public serpents.

Expand full comment
Aug 19, 2022·edited Aug 19, 2022

The media has been controlled forever. From lose lips sink ships in WWII, the German U-Boats were sinking merchant ships off the coast of the Carolinas to 911 and now, yesterday, I just learned, the entirety of the Japanese legislature resigned this week. Not a word about it in the western Corporate News.

It’s just sad that people haven’t figured it out yet.

Expand full comment

"I didn’t realize I was supposed to stick to the script. My mistake. Rookie error." - Sure it was ...

"It wasn't me. Nobody saw it. You can't prove a thing" - Bart Simpson

Expand full comment

There have been a lot of issues with medical journals and news organizations censoring things that go counter to the medical narrative, but everything greatly accelerated once COVID-19 started to the point it became obvious to everyone. Many people who have been monitoring the integrity of the scientific field noticed this happened.

I have seen various examples over the years of journals refusing to publish a study that supported a natural substance that competed with a pharmaceutical drug. For example:

•Early heads of the AMA founded their business model on promoting products for industry...which is why amongst other things there are so many cheesy ads of the AMA and doctors promoting smoking.

•One renowned journalist, Sharyl Attkinson, stated that she observed over time that the US media began preventing reporters from being able to cover a few specific topics (like vaccine dangers) and this played a big role in her decision to become independent.

Expand full comment