Should you get any vaccines? The data shows the more you vax, the sicker you are.
If you took 100% of the vaccines they want you to take, you're about 10X more likely to have medical issues. That's not a typo: 10X, not 10%!
When I interviewed Andrew Wakefield, he told me that you are roughly 10X more likely to be sick if you are vaccinated with the normal schedule vs. the unvaccinated.
Here is a link to the paper co-authored by my good friend James Lyons-Weiler which shows this very clearly: Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination by James Lyons-Weiler and Paul Thomas.
Here’s a key figure from the paper showing the more vaccinations you accept, the greater your chance of seeing the doctor (relative incidence of office visits). The trends were true for other causes as well (See Fig 4 and 5).
That’s called dose-dependency and it establishes (along with other factors) causality. It’s hard to explain a dose-dependency if there isn’t any causality.
The story on the retraction
From Retraction Watch is a short article on the retraction of the paper by the journal.
Here is the actual retraction notice that shows the authors objected to the unilateral decision to retract the paper by the journal. Notice how they didn’t disclose the reason it was retracted? They just said that they “confirmed that the conclusions were not supported by strong scientific data” without providing a single specific example!!! That’s how science works in the post-vaccine world (this was July 2021). No need to actually support your opinion with any specific facts.
The full story on the retraction from the author.
Evidence to the contrary
Here is a complete list of studies that show that the authors were wrong and that kids who got vaccinated actually had lower rates of disease, i.e., the more you vaccinate, the healthier your kids are:
<this space intentionally left blank>
What about autism?
Here is a clearly pro-vax website attempting to debunk the connection between vaccines and autism. It says:
The Institute of Medicine undertook a comprehensive safety review of the issue. Their preliminary report, published in 2001, stated the committee did not find enough evidence to support or reject a causal relationship between mercury in vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders. However, their final report, published in 2004, concluded that the large body of evidence gathered on the question since 2001 favored rejecting the hypothesis that mercury in vaccines was associated with neurodevelopmental disorders.
New evidence eh? What new evidence? And if the vaccines weren’t the cause, then what was the more likely cause? The silence is deafening here.
What about Alzheimer’s disease?
See this article showing the connection between aluminum in the brain and Alzheimer’s. The aluminum in your brain comes from injected aluminum only. Only one option there: the vaccines.
Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute (CMSRI) and this excellent article Has Snopes Been Snoped? Will Retraction Watch Retract? which cites a second paper showing the same results as the James Lyons-Weiler, Paul Thomas paper above. This second paper, Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children (see also this link), hasn’t been retracted.
Must read references
For more information, I encourage you to read these materials and decide for yourself.
Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination and
Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children)
The DTP vaccination study completed a few years ago looking at vaxed versus unvaxed kids in Africa using a natural experiment which left kids unvaccinated showed greater mortality in the group which had been vaccinated. The researchers who conducted the earlier vaccine campaign also conducted the comparison years later and were surprised at the result.
Even mainstream scientists are now starting to recommend against vaccinating kids for COVID as shown in this paper.
Statistics from the control group show it is far better to be unvaccinated
Turtles all the way down: Vaccine Science and Myth explores the science behind the vaccines (or actually the lack thereof)
Dissolving Illusions discloses that we were misled about vaccines eradicating disease.
Why is autism now affecting 1 in 30 children, when it used be 1 in 2500 pre-1970? And after autistic children are chelated, why do they improve?
Why do all the experts decline to debate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on this topic?
Why hasn’t anyone been able to show me any data showing an all-cause benefit from vaccination for any vaccine?
Check out this article which shows you what happens when I ask an experienced epidemiologist for the data. They run for cover.
Andrew Wakefield was right: all the vaccines are not safe.
We have known about problems with vaccines for a VERY long time. After all, there was outright mercury in them for decades! Now they say they took it out. Now people think all the injuries are from aluminum but it still looks like mercury to me. Why should we believe they took it out. They use it in the manufacturing process and supposedly remove it. What the fuck does it do in the "manufacturing process?" How do they filter it out? Why should I believe them?
Interesting from Steve’s article… I never even knew it existed…
“And after autistic children are chelated, why do they improve?“
I googled “chelated” and understand you eat or inject something, to get lead mercury etc out via urinating.
But the links from google say it does not work and is dangerous.
Does anyone know of articles /info/ first hand experience about chelation?
Will it help older adults?
Would giving a point of blood, remove some lead, mercury etc?