I just finished a Zoom interview here in New Zealand and the most important topic was the Baby Will story. If you haven't heard about it, here's the synopsis and where to find more info.
I am a long-time blood bank director. Directed donations are discouraged primarily for reason three in your list...they do not want a long list of people coming in and saying "I only want blood from these people". It is already hard enough to make this all work.
According to Roguski, they have recruited a large pool of potential donors. An infant surgery does not take all that much replacement blood, so it is entirely possible that there will be a match in their pool. Or not. The blood bank will be thrilled (I expect) to have that many donations because blood is always in short supply and only one or two units from the volunteers will likely be useful.
Matching is pretty arbitrary: Units are ABO/Rh typed and then pretty randomly selected (usually by expiration date) to be crossmatched. A major side crossmatch is all generally done which makes sure that there are no antibodies in the baby's blood that will clot the incoming transfusion. (A minor side crossmatch, seldom done but considered when volumes are equally small, checks the reverse.) Most matches get through first time. If not, one moves on. So if there are one or two good matches from the group they have assembled, that would be a win for the community and for them.
There is a further layer to put on this. Red cells (which is all they really need to transfuse) are just sacks of hemoglobin with a membrane. They do not contain organelles (like a nucleus) and I expect would not contain spike protein either...no place to attach since the red cell has just a simple unit membrane. So they could give packed, washed RBCs and accomplish all they wish from almost everyone's perspective. Why this is not discussed anywhere I find elusive. And this, of course, beggars the question as to whether someone vaccinated, let us say one year ago, would have any spike protein floating around in any case. Most would think not.
This seems like much ado that does not need to be there just to make a point. As I said, most blood banks will refuse directed donations not only because they likely do not match but also because they establish donation and use predicates that will cause most units to be wasted. If desired, they surely could use this as a major blood drive and "just happen" to use a unit from the drive if it happens to be compatible. Or they could just use washed, packed RBCs from the regular pool...likely will not be any more dangerous for Baby Will.
Happy to answer more questions if some folks have them.
I was of the mind that the spikes are not in the vax, but the sequence to produce synthetic spikes to train T cells to attack are built inside the body in reaction to that genetic sequence. This morning in a senate discussion Dr. Cole mentioned that spikes have been found in the tissues and the blood a month later. Might help to know how long the spikes keep producing and how long they stay in the body at maximum before we know. Because giving a vax to the baby could cause the baby to produce spikes and that would mean it would be risky.
Duke University surgeons are refusing a 14-year-old girl a kidney transplant because she has not received the Covid shotShe has already had Covid and recovered
[McCullough] said if the risk were high, it would have been noticed by now (I’m not sure I agree with that; there is a lot of willful blindness for anything associated with the vaccine).
From Open VAERS as of Nov 18:
42,048 deaths for all vaccines over 30 years.
32,370 from Covid vaccine. 76%
268,309 injuries for all over 30 years.
184,290 from Covid vaccine. 68%
No one in the willful blindness coalition has noticed that mRNA deaths are 76% of all vaccine deaths over 30 years and 68% of all vaccine injuries over 30 years. This is criminal, or it should be.
And since these reports are not anonymous there’s no excuse for the government not to be verifying this info. Other than pharmaceutical contributions of course.
their worst fears have been realised. Baby Will has been denied access to unvaxxed blood should he require a transfusion post or during his upcoming heart surgery. It's a very dark day for NZ and maybe globally.
Can he go somewhere civilized for the surgery, such as Florida or Eastern Europe? Would another place do what’s needed? How about a privately paid doctor team, if they can raise the money?
Following Tenor47's question further - why can't the blood itself be examined for the spike? I believe that Dr. Bhakdi and others describe that the spike protein may intrude into all systems and also the blood cells themselves. Does anyone know of any researchers comparing actual blood cells to see differences among the 4 possible scenarios (vaxxed with history of Covid, vaxxed with no history of Covid, unvaxxed with history of Covid, unvaxxed with no history of Covid? Steve Kirsch do you know?
Just in..........Baby Will Court Case, Auckland High Court - 6th Dec 2022.
Thank you to Counterspin Media for diligently covering it live today outside the High Court and massive love 🫶 to all the other independent media outlets & supporters of Baby Will and his family's right to choose, you're presence is HUGELY important!
Here's a good summary of what today:
"Sue did a brilliant job in court today.
She had solid scientific and legal evidence supporting the use of unv*xx*d blood and showed compassion and wisdom.
The crown lawyer had zero evidence to show that v*cc*n*t*d blood is safe. In fact, he had zero evidence of anything.
Blood Bank said that spike and m*NA remain in the blood for 14 days (we know that it is upwards of 60 days) and that they do not have a stand-down period for donation following v*cc*n*ti*n and that they do not enquire as to whether or not a donor is v*xx*d.
Blood Bank's main argument against the unv*xx*d donor blood was that it was inconvenient for Blood Bank.
Court ran from 11 - 4 with 2 breaks. The judge has now stepped out to reach his decision which he will likely give without reasoning at first, as there is a need for speed for the baby.
He implied he will return with the reasoning behind his decision afterwards.
We have an excellent chance unless the judge is being paid off.
I am a long-time blood bank director. Directed donations are discouraged primarily for reason three in your list...they do not want a long list of people coming in and saying "I only want blood from these people". It is already hard enough to make this all work.
According to Roguski, they have recruited a large pool of potential donors. An infant surgery does not take all that much replacement blood, so it is entirely possible that there will be a match in their pool. Or not. The blood bank will be thrilled (I expect) to have that many donations because blood is always in short supply and only one or two units from the volunteers will likely be useful.
Matching is pretty arbitrary: Units are ABO/Rh typed and then pretty randomly selected (usually by expiration date) to be crossmatched. A major side crossmatch is all generally done which makes sure that there are no antibodies in the baby's blood that will clot the incoming transfusion. (A minor side crossmatch, seldom done but considered when volumes are equally small, checks the reverse.) Most matches get through first time. If not, one moves on. So if there are one or two good matches from the group they have assembled, that would be a win for the community and for them.
There is a further layer to put on this. Red cells (which is all they really need to transfuse) are just sacks of hemoglobin with a membrane. They do not contain organelles (like a nucleus) and I expect would not contain spike protein either...no place to attach since the red cell has just a simple unit membrane. So they could give packed, washed RBCs and accomplish all they wish from almost everyone's perspective. Why this is not discussed anywhere I find elusive. And this, of course, beggars the question as to whether someone vaccinated, let us say one year ago, would have any spike protein floating around in any case. Most would think not.
This seems like much ado that does not need to be there just to make a point. As I said, most blood banks will refuse directed donations not only because they likely do not match but also because they establish donation and use predicates that will cause most units to be wasted. If desired, they surely could use this as a major blood drive and "just happen" to use a unit from the drive if it happens to be compatible. Or they could just use washed, packed RBCs from the regular pool...likely will not be any more dangerous for Baby Will.
Happy to answer more questions if some folks have them.
Any updates on baby Will?
I have just see this article. Washington State, poor baby passed after surgery of clot. Was given vaccine blood. So very sad.
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/newborn-baby-in-washington-state
I would never allow a covid19 vaccine blood transfusion to be used for myself or my husband.
And I refuse to be part of a trial to see what happens with the long term results of such transfusions.
We are vaccine free and should be allowed to choose vaccine free blood. Simple!
I was of the mind that the spikes are not in the vax, but the sequence to produce synthetic spikes to train T cells to attack are built inside the body in reaction to that genetic sequence. This morning in a senate discussion Dr. Cole mentioned that spikes have been found in the tissues and the blood a month later. Might help to know how long the spikes keep producing and how long they stay in the body at maximum before we know. Because giving a vax to the baby could cause the baby to produce spikes and that would mean it would be risky.
There's quite a lot of evidence that mRNA injection products are in the blood. This is heart wrenching information about the Baby Will story.
Duke University surgeons are refusing a 14-year-old girl a kidney transplant because she has not received the Covid shotShe has already had Covid and recovered
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/duke-university-surgeons-are-refusing?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=363080&post_id=89048480&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
[McCullough] said if the risk were high, it would have been noticed by now (I’m not sure I agree with that; there is a lot of willful blindness for anything associated with the vaccine).
From Open VAERS as of Nov 18:
42,048 deaths for all vaccines over 30 years.
32,370 from Covid vaccine. 76%
268,309 injuries for all over 30 years.
184,290 from Covid vaccine. 68%
No one in the willful blindness coalition has noticed that mRNA deaths are 76% of all vaccine deaths over 30 years and 68% of all vaccine injuries over 30 years. This is criminal, or it should be.
And since these reports are not anonymous there’s no excuse for the government not to be verifying this info. Other than pharmaceutical contributions of course.
Update from NZ....(so called justice system)
their worst fears have been realised. Baby Will has been denied access to unvaxxed blood should he require a transfusion post or during his upcoming heart surgery. It's a very dark day for NZ and maybe globally.
Can he go somewhere civilized for the surgery, such as Florida or Eastern Europe? Would another place do what’s needed? How about a privately paid doctor team, if they can raise the money?
babies are affected by their mothers breast milk and these sicko FN doctors say jabbed blood is safe.....
Following Tenor47's question further - why can't the blood itself be examined for the spike? I believe that Dr. Bhakdi and others describe that the spike protein may intrude into all systems and also the blood cells themselves. Does anyone know of any researchers comparing actual blood cells to see differences among the 4 possible scenarios (vaxxed with history of Covid, vaxxed with no history of Covid, unvaxxed with history of Covid, unvaxxed with no history of Covid? Steve Kirsch do you know?
Has anyone studied vaccinated blood? Seems like the spike protein would be evident (right?) and we could know for sure......
Is there a way to locate a comment by author?
Just in..........Baby Will Court Case, Auckland High Court - 6th Dec 2022.
Thank you to Counterspin Media for diligently covering it live today outside the High Court and massive love 🫶 to all the other independent media outlets & supporters of Baby Will and his family's right to choose, you're presence is HUGELY important!
Here's a good summary of what today:
"Sue did a brilliant job in court today.
She had solid scientific and legal evidence supporting the use of unv*xx*d blood and showed compassion and wisdom.
The crown lawyer had zero evidence to show that v*cc*n*t*d blood is safe. In fact, he had zero evidence of anything.
Blood Bank said that spike and m*NA remain in the blood for 14 days (we know that it is upwards of 60 days) and that they do not have a stand-down period for donation following v*cc*n*ti*n and that they do not enquire as to whether or not a donor is v*xx*d.
Blood Bank's main argument against the unv*xx*d donor blood was that it was inconvenient for Blood Bank.
Court ran from 11 - 4 with 2 breaks. The judge has now stepped out to reach his decision which he will likely give without reasoning at first, as there is a need for speed for the baby.
He implied he will return with the reasoning behind his decision afterwards.
We have an excellent chance unless the judge is being paid off.
What do you do when your child needs water and try to insist upon water that hasn’t been drawn from a well that is highly suspect for poison?