Note: This story has been updated on March 27 from the original published on the same date. Basically, the SARS-CoV-2 virus was man made (since you can’t get bacterial sequences into a virus naturally), and the existence of the 19nt sequence in the Moderna patent is a potential smoking gun because the full sequence is rare in nature. How did this happened “by chance” only the same company that has a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2? Moderna has some explaining to do about this, but nobody seems to want to explain it.

On March 14, 2022, The Daily Expose ran a story entitled, “Whilst you were distracted by the Battle for Ukraine, Documents were published confirming Moderna created the Covid-19 Virus.”

I reached out to one of our experts for his opinion. He wrote back that the sequence cited is not unique, agreeing with the critics of the study cited in the Daily Mail piece. Here’s what he wrote:

Same flawed story.
They omit the fact that the sequence is found in bacteria.
18bp of it is in a 2003 DOW patent.
They ignore the standard BLAST score for such a hit known as the E-Value which returns non significant hits since it’s so prevalent in bacteria.
The Moderna patent is on human homolog of the bacterial gene.
Moderna kitchen sinked over 33K genes in their sequence listing.
They don’t claim this sequence.

Here is the original paper that linked a sequence found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus to a sequence found in a Moderna patent:

A BLAST search for the 12-nucleotide insertion led us to a 100% reverse match in a proprietary sequence (SEQ ID11652, nt 2751-2733) found in the US patent 9,587,003 filed on Feb. 4, 2016 (10) (Figure 1). Examination of SEQ ID11652 revealed that the match extends beyond the 12-nucleotide insertion to a 19-nucleotide sequence.

Several comments to that paper point out that the sequence isn’t unique. Everyone agrees that the sequence isn’t unique.

But the full 19nt sequence is very rare.

And finding this particular sequence in a virus is impossible unless the virus was man made!

Here is the subsequent story in The Expose which goes into more detail about this. The key part is this:

So over a thousand bacteria have multiple copies of it. Humans have it. Cows have it. Plants have it. But no viruses have it at all except Covid19.
If nature was going to give it to viruses it would have done it by now, like it did with humans, like it did with cows, like it did with bacteria and like it did with plants.
The final codon completed inserted gene sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCA does not exist in natural viruses and neither does the CGG coded Furin Cleavage site CCTCGGCGGGCACGT which codes for PRRAR. But they do exist naturally in bacteria and in humans and in cows and in plants. Viruses can invade bacteria and insert their genes into the them. But bacteria cannot insert their genes into viruses. So the only way for bacterial DNA to end up in a virus is by human intervention. So Covid19 must have been man made.

That’s what any expert would conclude.

Totally agree: SARS-CoV-2 was man made.

The big question on the table though is whether Moderna is implicated here. On this experts have differing opinions. They all agree that Moderna should explain how SEQ ID11652 was included in their patent application and where it came from. This can lead us to the origins of SARS-CoV-2. I’m going to be interviewing Chris Martenson about this on Monday.

In general, the Expose does very valuable work in covering stories you won’t find anywhere else. I financially support them.

Fauci’s emails revealed that the experts he asked all thought the virus was man-made. Then it suddenly wasn’t. The reason: we don’t know because it was redacted from Fauci’s emails.

Also, the evidence is overwhelming that the virus was created in a lab, not in nature. Fauci was told that from the very beginning as we know from reading his redacted emails. Chris Martenson did a fabulous video on this: watch it here. It shows the record of scientific corruption. Fauci was told that the sequence was not natural and he never mentioned it.

What is interesting is that after a big redacted set of emails, the story suddenly changed to natural origin, even though the science did not change.

Nobody in Congress ever pursued how science could “magically” change like that. What was the new evidence that was revealed that the experts missed to convince all of them that the virus was of natural origin leading them to publish a paper on that theory? Nobody is talking about that. The reason: because there is no science that was subsequently “discovered” that would lead to the man-made hypothesis.

The Theresa Long testimony story in The Expose is very accurate

A reader wrote to me about another Expose story about how the military tried to illegally suppress testimony from a US army flight surgeon who wanted to testify about her area of expertise.

This is about an injunction obtained by unvaccinated military personnel in Florida. It says that there was testimony that someone was ordered to cover up vaccine injuries. I could not find a trace of this story anywhere else. Is it true?

Yes, that Expose story is absolutely true and I encourage everyone to read it right now if you haven’t already.

It shows you that the US military is doing everything it can to cover up the harm they did to US soldiers. They are still in denial and the more they deny the evidence, the worse they look. Mathew Crawford, among others, has been looking at the data, and there is no doubt that it was tampered with under the guise that a “glitch” was fixed. There should be “all eyes” on this and Secretary Austin should be calling for an investigation, but there is silence from Congress and the military.

The DoD will not respond to questions from anyone on this issue except for PolitiFact (who never asks any hard questions and always supports the mainstream narrative) and the US Federal court.

So a US Senator can’t get his questions answered, but PolitiFact can get their questions answered. That’s astonishing. The mainstream media doesn’t cover that story. This is the world we live in today.

By the way, have you ever read a single PolitiFact “fact check” that went against the mainstream narrative? Let me know!

A story in The Epoch Times you should also read now

I have found that The Epoch Times is a very reliable news source that runs stories you never see in the mainstream media like this one about a lawsuit brought by people who have been censored by Twitter. I concur with this lawsuit.

Tech companies should be actively helping people who are trying to spread the truth. Instead, they are helping the government censor the truth and keep Americans learning the truth. When Twitter obliterated my Twitter account for life, they didn’t present a shred of evidence that what I was saying was incorrect or could possibly cause harm to anyone. I was censored on three platforms for disagreeing with the government narrative. That’s something I should be allowed to do in a free society.

Steve Kirsch's newsletter

A Daily Expose story claims "documents were…