191 Comments

Next study says that yours mentioned study is biased: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8629773/#bib0025 quoting: "We thus avoided the pitfall of drawing biased conclusions from the study of rural and urban counties combined [25]"

Expand full comment

So my girl, born 1995, got one set of well baby shots at 2 months of age. Developed horrifying colic and diaper rash. It cleared in 3 months but I never went back for more shots. Felt scalded and afraid but did not realize it was the injections filled with mercury, aluminum, human primitive DNA, etc., etc., that caused her issues.

Skip forward to 1999. I put her in a small private Episcopal School.

They literally lied to me, said, "If she does not take all the shots she will never go to school in the state of Florida."

I thought I had to. I thought, "every other child takes them and appears to be fine." After the first set she became very seriously ill,

and wound up in the hospital with pneumonia. Fighting for her life at 4 years of age.

I now know from the Guinea Bessou study that deaths by sepsis and pneumonia in vaxxed little girls are 10× higher than Mumps, Measles and Rubella ever were. Same with DPT. More unvaccinated survive than vaxxed. Fact. Vaxxes kill kids more often than anyone knows in the mainstream medical world. But the studies are there to prove it, if you look.

After that she received 3 more sets. To be compliant. It almost killed her. Totally destroyed immune system. Allergic to everything on Earth. Miserable permanent Rhinitis and unending stomach pain. Caught every bug on Earth.

Eliminating all allergens and years of herbal medicine got her 3/4 of the way to healthy. I think that's a win, considering.

I did not understand, at the time. Looking back I cannot believe I did what a pack of ignorant fools told me I had to, and watched my daughter's health and happiness be destroyed as a result.

But, it made me dig for the facts for 2 decades afterwards. I now know what was in those injections. And will never ever listen to "experts" again.

Pity the people who are now where I was then. It's terrifying. And will break your heart when you know what you have done to those you love.

Expand full comment

Is this the Lyons-Weiler study referred to above?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/

Expand full comment

Thanks Steve for your excellent work. I agree with your premise. I just don't think the graph provides any valuable data. Please see the ourworldindata link below which shows cases increase in line with number of tests. Given the recent phenomena of massive queuues to get tested, your graph looks more like correlation than causation. Would like to see similar with a vertical axis of cases per number tested. The more we test the higher the number of cases. Better to know 'Cases per 100,000 tests'. The more tests you do, obviously the more cases: a major confounding factor. Without measuring cases per 100,000 tests, (or per million), there is no valid proof of Steve Kirsch's claim. The graph is based on number of cases only. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-19-daily-tests-vs-daily-new-confirmed-cases-per-million https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-more-we-vaccinate-the-higher

Expand full comment

A while back someone in my friend's household, one of the teenage boys I think, got Covid and then everyone in the house, dad, mom, 2 teenage boys got it. No one was hospitalized. Later they all got 2 vaccine jabs. Me and the dad had a social lunch planned for today but yesterday he called me to tell me that one of the son's brought Covid home from school and infected his brother and mother. Dad is not infected yet. Mother also had the third jab. We canceled lunch as I am not vaccinated. This is in Idaho.

Expand full comment

A chimp figured this out months ago. A hairy chimp. Only the chimp was smart enough to blame the Death Jabs posing as vaccines for the confirmed serious illnesses cropping up, as well as the chimp PROVING that the entire medical boards of Hawaii and elsewhere were LYING people into a state off poor health, denying proven CHEAP AND EFFECTIVE cures to these patients. This eventually or soon thereafter killed them.

Expand full comment

Looks pretty random to me. We need a clearer trend before making any claims.

Expand full comment

Agree with Hawkeye that the R2 value is very low. It might suggest something, but that alone isn't enough to suggest further research. We already have enough data to suggest a lot of research, and this R2 value isn't it.

Expand full comment

no standardisation of testing methodology across states; variable testing rates; variable quality of lab analysis; vaxxed believe narrative = more likely to get tested; PCR not diagnostic of any disease; "virus" never isolated; "virus" never proven to be mono-causal agent of covid19. I could go on...

Expand full comment

STEVE KIRSCH - If I were you, I would remove “Jeff” and “p3ck3rwood” from your comments section. I have been a paid subscriber for quite some time and have found your site to be very helpful. However, these nutjobs are making me doubt the site’s credibility. Thank you.

Expand full comment

You might know this, Steve, but Cornell University is having a "spike" despite its 97% vax rate. Red alert level, with 469 active cases. Final exams will be remote! There's a link to their dashboard in the article. I wonder if they treat students who have the virus? I see that they offer mental health counseling for students and employees. What about early treatment for the virus??

https://cornellsun.com/2021/12/14/cornell-shuts-down-campus-facilities-moves-finals-online/?fbclid=IwAR00k5rC-y75PgadaOo8fKlFMP4O_UREWeCRV63ixNW0PgyBGnNcReVmvZc

Expand full comment

They "just follow orders"... Where have we heard THAT before?

Never forget.

Expand full comment

Hey Steve, check the link for the study...in G-mail it doesn't work. When I came to this page in Chrome - it works fine. 🤔 Screwggle's BigTech fuckery at work?

Expand full comment

FYI: an R2 value of 0.0269 is VERY LOW. It may be statistically significant, but it means that a VERY small percentage of the variance is "accounted for" by these two variables.

Yes, the line of best fit is going the wrong way, but it is of pretty low "meaningful significance".

All that said, I agree the vaccines are terrible. They were never designed to work, and it is absolutely terrifying that those vaccinated before naturally infected appear to be much worse off that those infected naturally only, or vaccinated after natural infection. The risk profile of these vaccines is also absolutely insane, and somehow we need to get someone to step up and put an end to this complete madness.

Expand full comment