In the UK they have just started an advertising campaign saying it’s normal for this to come back in older people as their immune system weakens! I can only assume that we are seeing large scale numbers of people getting shingles for them to have to start putting out adverts about it. The website they have created and publicise during the advert is: https://www.understandingshingles.co.uk/
I’ve also posted this info to Jessie Rose in the hope that this gets some traction. It would be interesting to see just how high shingles is compared to pre Covid.
Don't take covid tests, they are another weapon, too. They've been weaponized. Read about theragrippers, swab crystals, swab snakes and tubes. Some of these are already patented drug and chemical delivery systems. They use the tests to deliver toxins to get more of the victims who won't take GM RNA injections.
These testing kits from China : who vets them to insure that they are reliable & safe ? They could be another delivery mechanism . Remember : China has now learn how to do gain of function . China could release another virus even more deadly & targeted .
I'm not getting any work done, these posts are too interesting! I have just read a brilliant article from a post by Brian Pottinger, a reporter in South Australia. It should be mandatory reading for all politicians moments before they are gently laid onto the operating table for their lobotomies.
I am responding to the very nicely illustrated and annotated Retrovirus in color! Very cool. Now, I am just a simple mechanical engineer, retired. However, I have used an electron microscope and have at least a basic understanding of seeing things at high power using electrons. On the other hand, I assume it is VERY hard to prepare anything organic for viewing under an electron micrscope because of the need to (usually) metal vapor coat substances in the target. So. I will likely make a fool of myself here but how in the world when a virus is STILL so small(100 nm) all the images I have seen(granted, not many) of virus's shows this image of a particle, sometimes round that is fuzzy at best and if little spikes are there it is pretty hard to be able to CLAIM for sure what they really look like. . . can this wonderful color image possibly have any basis in real fact be created with any semblance of actuality?! It claims to show things way, way smaller than the virus particle itself(the membrane, RNA strands inside?!) I can only theorize that the illustration is no more sure of itself than the theory of evolution is. What say you experts!?
one more thing! . . .
" . . . the authors of two significant papers, which are mentioned in connection with the detection of SARS-CoV-2, concede on request that the electron microscope images shown in their work do not depict completely purified particles. But how can one then conclude with certainty that the RNA gene sequences „pulled“ from the tissue samples prepared in these studies and to which the PCR tests are then „calibrated“ belong to a very specific virus—in this case SARS-CoV-2? Especially since studies also show that the very substances (including antibiotics) used in the test tube experiments (in vitro) can „stress“ the cell culture in such a way that new gene sequences can be formed that were previously undetectable?"
Why don't we have a readily available test for natural immunity? Not just antibodies but those very important T cells. That would also be proof for the unvaccinated with natural immunity that they don't need a vaccine - however, that doesn't suit the agenda of those in power. People who had SARs1 still have natural immunity seventeen years later...
Instead of endlessly debating the merits of vaccine vs natural immunity, why not focus on what can easily be proven?
1. the effectiveness of early treatment with safe, well understood products.
2. the unethical act of denying their use, and of threatening those who prescribe them.
If everyone focused on these two related issues, we'd make more progress. Time itself would reveal the validity of early treatment vs. vaccines, while the identity of those who refuse to allow that comparison is already known.
I don’t find a lot of info in the status of the Novavax approval, which leads me to believe Novavax is being slow-rolled by BigPharma controlled FDA. I conclude that any vax not mRNA based is undesireable because it might work and pollute the data from the Big Experimnet. The confounder though is that I read Novavax is from. Bill Gates funded company. I guess the larger point is, what DOESN’T Bill gates have his vax dollars involved in?
Also, no one seems to be addressing the increased death count in the US: is this due to the "antivirals" such as Remdesivir being used now more heavily? We generally are not seeing more increases in countries such as Sweden where they are lifting all mandates.
My husband and I were apart of a clinical trial that looked at 41 different antibodies generated to the virus. We had been infected quite early on (before vaccinations was even a mention) but still currently show robust antibodies to many parts of the virus, including the nucleuomembrain BUT NOT the nucleocapsid. We both had the disease and one of us is vaccinated while the other is not. From seeing others results from the clinical trial, it doesn’t appear that many people vaccinated or not develop antibodies to this part of the virus.. or perhaps they are quite short lived. I personally think antibody research and understanding (along with T cell memory) is the key to moving forward and correcting mistakes… the ones which can be corrected that is.
Hi Steve,
You mention the resurgence of shingles.
In the UK they have just started an advertising campaign saying it’s normal for this to come back in older people as their immune system weakens! I can only assume that we are seeing large scale numbers of people getting shingles for them to have to start putting out adverts about it. The website they have created and publicise during the advert is: https://www.understandingshingles.co.uk/
I’ve also posted this info to Jessie Rose in the hope that this gets some traction. It would be interesting to see just how high shingles is compared to pre Covid.
Do you see this as support for original antigenic sin? Does this complement and work in tandem with ADE in promoting negative vaccine efficacy?
Don't take covid tests, they are another weapon, too. They've been weaponized. Read about theragrippers, swab crystals, swab snakes and tubes. Some of these are already patented drug and chemical delivery systems. They use the tests to deliver toxins to get more of the victims who won't take GM RNA injections.
These testing kits from China : who vets them to insure that they are reliable & safe ? They could be another delivery mechanism . Remember : China has now learn how to do gain of function . China could release another virus even more deadly & targeted .
It's like a slow moving trainwreck, and we, the unvaxxed, are standing outside watching ... in horror, as so many on the train are our own.
I'm not getting any work done, these posts are too interesting! I have just read a brilliant article from a post by Brian Pottinger, a reporter in South Australia. It should be mandatory reading for all politicians moments before they are gently laid onto the operating table for their lobotomies.
I am responding to the very nicely illustrated and annotated Retrovirus in color! Very cool. Now, I am just a simple mechanical engineer, retired. However, I have used an electron microscope and have at least a basic understanding of seeing things at high power using electrons. On the other hand, I assume it is VERY hard to prepare anything organic for viewing under an electron micrscope because of the need to (usually) metal vapor coat substances in the target. So. I will likely make a fool of myself here but how in the world when a virus is STILL so small(100 nm) all the images I have seen(granted, not many) of virus's shows this image of a particle, sometimes round that is fuzzy at best and if little spikes are there it is pretty hard to be able to CLAIM for sure what they really look like. . . can this wonderful color image possibly have any basis in real fact be created with any semblance of actuality?! It claims to show things way, way smaller than the virus particle itself(the membrane, RNA strands inside?!) I can only theorize that the illustration is no more sure of itself than the theory of evolution is. What say you experts!?
one more thing! . . .
" . . . the authors of two significant papers, which are mentioned in connection with the detection of SARS-CoV-2, concede on request that the electron microscope images shown in their work do not depict completely purified particles. But how can one then conclude with certainty that the RNA gene sequences „pulled“ from the tissue samples prepared in these studies and to which the PCR tests are then „calibrated“ belong to a very specific virus—in this case SARS-CoV-2? Especially since studies also show that the very substances (including antibiotics) used in the test tube experiments (in vitro) can „stress“ the cell culture in such a way that new gene sequences can be formed that were previously undetectable?"
Engelbrecht, Torsten; Köhnlein, Claus; Bailey, Samantha; Scoglio, Stefano. Virus Mania (p. 369).
Why don't we have a readily available test for natural immunity? Not just antibodies but those very important T cells. That would also be proof for the unvaccinated with natural immunity that they don't need a vaccine - however, that doesn't suit the agenda of those in power. People who had SARs1 still have natural immunity seventeen years later...
Instead of endlessly debating the merits of vaccine vs natural immunity, why not focus on what can easily be proven?
1. the effectiveness of early treatment with safe, well understood products.
2. the unethical act of denying their use, and of threatening those who prescribe them.
If everyone focused on these two related issues, we'd make more progress. Time itself would reveal the validity of early treatment vs. vaccines, while the identity of those who refuse to allow that comparison is already known.
I ain't getting tested even if I have symptoms. UNLESS I get one of rare doctors who has bravely fought this NWO nightmare, and they advise it.
Google Sinopeg.I think they gave good informations coming to truth about vaccines.
I don’t find a lot of info in the status of the Novavax approval, which leads me to believe Novavax is being slow-rolled by BigPharma controlled FDA. I conclude that any vax not mRNA based is undesireable because it might work and pollute the data from the Big Experimnet. The confounder though is that I read Novavax is from. Bill Gates funded company. I guess the larger point is, what DOESN’T Bill gates have his vax dollars involved in?
Hear hear, As a fellow physician,
I heartily agree with the good doctors comments.
The credentials for the fact checkers to be fact checkers is seriously in question.
Physicians and scientists without conflicts of interest are more reliable sources of accurate information.
Also, no one seems to be addressing the increased death count in the US: is this due to the "antivirals" such as Remdesivir being used now more heavily? We generally are not seeing more increases in countries such as Sweden where they are lifting all mandates.
Yes DoNMass, you are right, but prayer can work miracles!👵😇
My husband and I were apart of a clinical trial that looked at 41 different antibodies generated to the virus. We had been infected quite early on (before vaccinations was even a mention) but still currently show robust antibodies to many parts of the virus, including the nucleuomembrain BUT NOT the nucleocapsid. We both had the disease and one of us is vaccinated while the other is not. From seeing others results from the clinical trial, it doesn’t appear that many people vaccinated or not develop antibodies to this part of the virus.. or perhaps they are quite short lived. I personally think antibody research and understanding (along with T cell memory) is the key to moving forward and correcting mistakes… the ones which can be corrected that is.