In case you missed it, two mainstream docs admit they were wrong. They now realize that public health officials cannot be trusted with public health decisions: and this one, just in case you missed the earlier one. Maybe someday, we’ll actually be able to question a public health official on their insane policies
When these "officials" are questioned, it will be in chains, awaiting execution for crimes against humanity. This is where they all belong. I've no time for anything BUT seeing to it they are brought to justice. Arguing with them is like having a croaking contest with a toad. Useless. They are demons who do nothing but lie.
All you need to know about the truth is that TPTB and big pharma sought to hide the data for 75 years. And we know, they would have extended it just like they did the documents on the JFK assassination. Anyone remember Trump promising he would release the JFK docs? Did he?
Anyone remember Las Vegas and how we were all told it was clearly one guy? How about the lies about every war? How about all the wars the media doesn't even bother to acknowledge that are waged without Congress ever even voting on them?
Now we have documents leaked that they knew from the beginning it was not a single shooter in Vegas. We have the docs that Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rice and their corrupt media moutpieces all knew WMDs were non-existent. All the stuff about Assaad gassing his own people were lies from Obama.
We live in a world of lies. Most people suck them down more eagerly and fast than a frat boy does alcohol. Not only that, but those same people are manipulated by media and government to want to destroy anyone who doesn't agree with them instead of being curious and having intellectual debate to uncover the truth.
It is a serious weakness of humanity that we seem to have some desire to defer to and trust authority as a default position.
I am not hesitant. I am convinced. Based on the data, the deception by the media, the pharmaceutical companies, the corruption of every institution that I once trusted. The insanity that I have witnessed over the last two plus years. I am convinced these experimental drugs are causing more harm than good. When you suspect that a vaccine that is supposedly "safe and effective" is causing death and destruction but the powers that be are denying and hiding this information. Why the hell would I take the risk for a virus that is and has always been 98% survivable and treatable???
Although I appreciate what Makary and Prasad have said lately, they are still advocating that the initial 2 dose regimen was justified. Prasad speaks constantly about the importance of well designed RCT's. However, I am yet to find, a piece where he uses his analysis from the Clinical Trial Data (instead he references biased government data) to defend his position on the 2-dose vaccine regimen. This is going to be a problem again if these same ppl can't admit they were wrong about the approval of the Vaccine Program. And, if I missing some high-level evidence from the Clinical Trial Data, please reference it for me. Although, its been 2 years and I still am waiting for someone to refer to the Clinical Trial Data to defend the EUA authorization.
Its even more confusing that ppl like yourself were vaccinated in the first place. If someone has insight into these phenomenon's, please enlighten me.
Then Makary went on to tweet that his university Johns Hopkins is busy making self spreading vaccines which will double as a bioweapon to spread with no consent amongst the plebes who resist their "medicine".
J/k. That was satire, me saying the quiet part out loud.
Man oh man, oh man! Even when the truth is laid out before us, there will still be na-sayers / deniers, who would rather listen to the 'boss man' and die, than stand like a man and defy the lies. There are still those who deny Jesus rose from the dead, even though they reap the same salvation if they want it. So, it goes on and on. Forced mask mandates, forced poison shots, and then, death by the thousands. (But then, why not? We kill 6 million babies every year by abortions, and that isn't even by mandate. It's premeditated by un-intelligent design.)
In addition to Makary and Prasad, who sometimes are a bit critical, would the dean at Stanford listen to the normally-vaccine-shill Paul Offit? Offit advised his college-age son to skip the booster. In a new NEJM article, he says people have to tolerate mild or asymptomatic infections, as only frequent boosters can avoid these. He says there's no benefit to third doses for under-12s and criticizes the decision to do the one-size-fits-all boosting. He declares there's an elevated myocarditis risk in young men. He even admits that boosters can cause OAS for all ages.
Maybe the dean would think twice about mandating boosters, at least?
even if vax did prevent transmission, vax passport still unjustifiable. it would have been really convenient for the globalists to implement their plan if the science was wat they hoped it was going to be.
I am so very pleased to welcome Prasad and Makary with open arms! I do not hold grudges, I let bygones be bygones. I pray that more will grasp these realities.
I have very low expectations on accountability (other than that before the Great White Throne) given the amount of people involved. All such incidences were either suppressed (e.g. how the US deliberately chose to be silent on the war crimes of German corporations), or brushed away (e.g. Rwanda). It took individuals years of their life to try to get some satisfaction, but they were often actively opposed (e.g. Simon Wiesenthal)
Steve, the damage that has been done to the “social contract” and the medical profession, in general, is one of the saddest outcomes of this Covid-19 debacle. That being said, the medical profession, especially doctors, have opened their kimono and shown, with great clarity, that too many of them are often irrational, don’t follow the science, have broken their Hippocratic Oath and have not earned nor deserve the respect they previously were accorded.
Actually, the cowardice and self-interest, over patient interest, shown by too many doctors is appalling and extremely worrisome. We have thousands, if not not tens of thousands, of doctors who have clearly put their practice, career, income and research grants ahead of patients.
A profession I once thought was full of people with solid Beliefs, Values, Ethics, Morals and Principles (BVEMPs) has turned me completely around—they folded like a cheap suitcase—sad. I’m now convinced that this profession has shot themselves in the collective foot and may never be able to gain back the respect and trust they have loss.
Finally, when the open medical kimono reveals the truth, there is always a price to pay and, sadly, too many doctors are going to pay a steep price for their refusal to be brave, stand and be counted and seen as true leaders in medicine and science.
When too many of the protectors (doctors) become the assailants, they are, indeed, not to be trusted implicitly, as they once were, with a person’s health and vulnerabilities.
Thank you Steve! You have seen the opinion piece in the British Medical Journal on the corruption of evidence based medicine by corporate interests? The truth is starting to leak through...: https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702
The use of the term social contract is very significant and I am glad the good doctor referenced it. I wrote about the term in response to the ideology that we must as a social duty go along with the mandates using two examples. Sadly there are many more I could have used. I am now a fan of Dr Rand Paul
Hi Steve, my comment is beyond just this issue yet related. It is a series of reflections or observations. The article you recently posted from Igor about the behavioural researcher who used the term nudge regarding the creation of new behaviours seems to me very disconcerting in its similarity to old school operant conditioning and Skinner box type psychology. The term nudge seems to come up all the time now. They want to nudge , or shape or condition our responses and reward us for obeying and punish us or negatively reinforce us for disobeying.
I just read today that some who disagree with the unmasking on transportation are first trying to discredit Fla. Fed. judge and second trying to mandate teaching Public health in Law school. As opposed to letting medical doctors do their job and lawyers focus on law the government wanst to control top down and decide what is taught and continue to change definitions and diagnosis and health care management to their own end.The mass hypnosis we have all been subjected to and behavioural experiment is finally coming to some peoples awareness but as we all know the media and govt. and Pharma have a lot to lose and will keep discrediting those who speak out. I am thrilled to hear more mainstream docs are speaking out and I would love to see more psychologists and psychotherapists speak out about the current situation. Thank you for all the hard work.
When these "officials" are questioned, it will be in chains, awaiting execution for crimes against humanity. This is where they all belong. I've no time for anything BUT seeing to it they are brought to justice. Arguing with them is like having a croaking contest with a toad. Useless. They are demons who do nothing but lie.
All you need to know about the truth is that TPTB and big pharma sought to hide the data for 75 years. And we know, they would have extended it just like they did the documents on the JFK assassination. Anyone remember Trump promising he would release the JFK docs? Did he?
Anyone remember Las Vegas and how we were all told it was clearly one guy? How about the lies about every war? How about all the wars the media doesn't even bother to acknowledge that are waged without Congress ever even voting on them?
Now we have documents leaked that they knew from the beginning it was not a single shooter in Vegas. We have the docs that Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rice and their corrupt media moutpieces all knew WMDs were non-existent. All the stuff about Assaad gassing his own people were lies from Obama.
We live in a world of lies. Most people suck them down more eagerly and fast than a frat boy does alcohol. Not only that, but those same people are manipulated by media and government to want to destroy anyone who doesn't agree with them instead of being curious and having intellectual debate to uncover the truth.
It is a serious weakness of humanity that we seem to have some desire to defer to and trust authority as a default position.
I am not hesitant. I am convinced. Based on the data, the deception by the media, the pharmaceutical companies, the corruption of every institution that I once trusted. The insanity that I have witnessed over the last two plus years. I am convinced these experimental drugs are causing more harm than good. When you suspect that a vaccine that is supposedly "safe and effective" is causing death and destruction but the powers that be are denying and hiding this information. Why the hell would I take the risk for a virus that is and has always been 98% survivable and treatable???
Although I appreciate what Makary and Prasad have said lately, they are still advocating that the initial 2 dose regimen was justified. Prasad speaks constantly about the importance of well designed RCT's. However, I am yet to find, a piece where he uses his analysis from the Clinical Trial Data (instead he references biased government data) to defend his position on the 2-dose vaccine regimen. This is going to be a problem again if these same ppl can't admit they were wrong about the approval of the Vaccine Program. And, if I missing some high-level evidence from the Clinical Trial Data, please reference it for me. Although, its been 2 years and I still am waiting for someone to refer to the Clinical Trial Data to defend the EUA authorization.
Its even more confusing that ppl like yourself were vaccinated in the first place. If someone has insight into these phenomenon's, please enlighten me.
Then Makary went on to tweet that his university Johns Hopkins is busy making self spreading vaccines which will double as a bioweapon to spread with no consent amongst the plebes who resist their "medicine".
J/k. That was satire, me saying the quiet part out loud.
Man oh man, oh man! Even when the truth is laid out before us, there will still be na-sayers / deniers, who would rather listen to the 'boss man' and die, than stand like a man and defy the lies. There are still those who deny Jesus rose from the dead, even though they reap the same salvation if they want it. So, it goes on and on. Forced mask mandates, forced poison shots, and then, death by the thousands. (But then, why not? We kill 6 million babies every year by abortions, and that isn't even by mandate. It's premeditated by un-intelligent design.)
Steve, be curious and pick up an old book Dr. Mary's Monkey, could history be repeating itself?
In addition to Makary and Prasad, who sometimes are a bit critical, would the dean at Stanford listen to the normally-vaccine-shill Paul Offit? Offit advised his college-age son to skip the booster. In a new NEJM article, he says people have to tolerate mild or asymptomatic infections, as only frequent boosters can avoid these. He says there's no benefit to third doses for under-12s and criticizes the decision to do the one-size-fits-all boosting. He declares there's an elevated myocarditis risk in young men. He even admits that boosters can cause OAS for all ages.
Maybe the dean would think twice about mandating boosters, at least?
Covid-19 Boosters — Where from Here?
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2203329
For a detailed look, with humor, Coffee and Covid is covering it
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-coffee-and-covid-tuesday-april-19?s=r
even if vax did prevent transmission, vax passport still unjustifiable. it would have been really convenient for the globalists to implement their plan if the science was wat they hoped it was going to be.
I am so very pleased to welcome Prasad and Makary with open arms! I do not hold grudges, I let bygones be bygones. I pray that more will grasp these realities.
I have very low expectations on accountability (other than that before the Great White Throne) given the amount of people involved. All such incidences were either suppressed (e.g. how the US deliberately chose to be silent on the war crimes of German corporations), or brushed away (e.g. Rwanda). It took individuals years of their life to try to get some satisfaction, but they were often actively opposed (e.g. Simon Wiesenthal)
You are fearless!
Steve, the damage that has been done to the “social contract” and the medical profession, in general, is one of the saddest outcomes of this Covid-19 debacle. That being said, the medical profession, especially doctors, have opened their kimono and shown, with great clarity, that too many of them are often irrational, don’t follow the science, have broken their Hippocratic Oath and have not earned nor deserve the respect they previously were accorded.
Actually, the cowardice and self-interest, over patient interest, shown by too many doctors is appalling and extremely worrisome. We have thousands, if not not tens of thousands, of doctors who have clearly put their practice, career, income and research grants ahead of patients.
A profession I once thought was full of people with solid Beliefs, Values, Ethics, Morals and Principles (BVEMPs) has turned me completely around—they folded like a cheap suitcase—sad. I’m now convinced that this profession has shot themselves in the collective foot and may never be able to gain back the respect and trust they have loss.
Finally, when the open medical kimono reveals the truth, there is always a price to pay and, sadly, too many doctors are going to pay a steep price for their refusal to be brave, stand and be counted and seen as true leaders in medicine and science.
When too many of the protectors (doctors) become the assailants, they are, indeed, not to be trusted implicitly, as they once were, with a person’s health and vulnerabilities.
Thank you Steve! You have seen the opinion piece in the British Medical Journal on the corruption of evidence based medicine by corporate interests? The truth is starting to leak through...: https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702
The use of the term social contract is very significant and I am glad the good doctor referenced it. I wrote about the term in response to the ideology that we must as a social duty go along with the mandates using two examples. Sadly there are many more I could have used. I am now a fan of Dr Rand Paul
https://kerrylee.substack.com/p/the-social-contract-a-historical?s=w
Hi Steve, my comment is beyond just this issue yet related. It is a series of reflections or observations. The article you recently posted from Igor about the behavioural researcher who used the term nudge regarding the creation of new behaviours seems to me very disconcerting in its similarity to old school operant conditioning and Skinner box type psychology. The term nudge seems to come up all the time now. They want to nudge , or shape or condition our responses and reward us for obeying and punish us or negatively reinforce us for disobeying.
I just read today that some who disagree with the unmasking on transportation are first trying to discredit Fla. Fed. judge and second trying to mandate teaching Public health in Law school. As opposed to letting medical doctors do their job and lawyers focus on law the government wanst to control top down and decide what is taught and continue to change definitions and diagnosis and health care management to their own end.The mass hypnosis we have all been subjected to and behavioural experiment is finally coming to some peoples awareness but as we all know the media and govt. and Pharma have a lot to lose and will keep discrediting those who speak out. I am thrilled to hear more mainstream docs are speaking out and I would love to see more psychologists and psychotherapists speak out about the current situation. Thank you for all the hard work.