All the workers don't want the vaccine. They say nothing when asked. Finally an ITU doctor speaks the truth. The UK Health Secretary ignores him saying they "take advice from vaccine experts."
Firstly, I don’t believe in compulsory vaccination. However, just because someone is a medical consultant (anaesthetist), and has the confidence to share their view to the Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, does not mean they are well-informed about the relative merits of vaccination and acquired immunity. Nor does it mean they are correct.
The anaesthetist politely expressed a view. ‘His’ view. He didn’t cite any data to support any part of his view. Some aspects ARE supported by data, others are not.
There is now accumulating evidence that people with acquired immunity may have differing levels of protection to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. More importantly, the data indicate that those who’ve had and recovered from a COVID-19 infection still stand to benefit from getting vaccinated.
Greaney et al., Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabi9915 (2021)
Vaccine-elicited antibodies have been shown to bind more broadly across the recepror-binding domain (RBD), including to the more conserved “core” regions. This broader binding makes neutralization by vaccine sera more resistant to mutations within the RBD. This helps explain the relative ineffectiveness of convalescent sera, which many people initially thought would be a successful treatment for patients with severe COVID. In fact, ‘RBD-directed neutralization by convalescent sera was greatly reduced or even eliminated by a combination of key mutations at the three major epitopes in the RBD’s receptor-binding motif, but all vaccine sera tested retained substantial neutralization against this triple mutant.’
Amanat et al. also reported that several single RBD mutations reduce binding of serum from individuals vaccinated with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine less than for serum from previously infected individuals.
Sajid Javid would rather lose, overnight (when deadline for mandatory vaccine for medical staff is reached), around 10% of the highly qualified medical experts than give natural immunity the same status as the vaccines. It's truly astonishing. There is zero science in that. Finally, someone has challenged him about this in public and his response was appalling, resorting to attacking the doctor personally rather than debating with facts and science. I guess natural immunity is not profitable for the government's pharma mates (and, I suspect, their family members' shareholdings in those pharma companies). I cannot think of any other possible reasons for why the government would continue to totally disregard natural immunity.
A living nightmare. No entity has the right to put someone in the position of even contemplating the option of suicide, let alone judging it as valid or considerable. For some number, as time passes, I might expect this population sector worldwide to enlarge.
Without the necessary policy changes being made -- ie, were all the liberal democracies in question currently "led" by such ignorant or otherwise evil, Wansseekonferenz-attendee-like top Health Officials as Sajid Javid, the one seen in the video "debating" past COVID-19 infectee and thus fully immunized King's Hospital ITU anesthesiologist Dr Steve James -- the human race would then appear to be on course for actual, very sizable extermination within 10 years.
Very possibly, if not already likely.
During that time-period, the possibly emergent, deliberate choice of suicide would thus naturally not only normalize; it might quite possibly be deemed as serious thought and action by clinicians, and even by other, non-medical, responsible thinkers, such as bioethicist-philosophers, as arguably coherent and rational. This would constitute a human inversion event -- humanity turned on itself -- like American cities attacked by their own invention and reign, that of passenger planes, on 9/11.
Again, on a purely semantic but existential note, this is not planned and organized genocide -- no particular ethnic group or another is being singled out by psychologically disturbed, severely wrongheaded, mad human mutants and annihilated for exactly who they are. Rather, this is organized planning, it seems, directed against the human race generally, and is thus more properly termed -- for the first and probably only time in recorded history of which I'm aware -- humanicide. On the way to such a staggeringly unimaginable end-event, the increasing prevalence of suicide can be reasonably anticipated.
It is up to us now to preempt this self-destructive event -- designed and led by such power-and-control-lusting psychopaths, wholly unrepresentative in nature and deed of those they now slow-murder, unique in known human history -- and establish a saner, more enlightened and ordered world-community made for all in proper measures affording -- better, guaranteeing -- liberty and equal justice for present and future human beings. Somehow, in some especially creative and innovative way, we will manage that.
Because, in contrast to those we seek to and must overthrow, we love our children more than we love ourselves.
I question the results of the asymptotic study when I look at what happened at Cornell University last month. An entire cohort of recently vaccinated people that are of a similar age group. Almost 100% of the campus is vaccinated yet more infections than the previous pre-vaccine era.
Best part of this is they figured out how to see if asymptomatic can happen by randomly testing people in hallways and class rooms for weeks before they started to run into asymptomatic people in December. I believe the term they used was most. On track to break 1,800 students before closing on campus class down.
Great dashboard you can go through the entire range of dates
It's been two years now. All of these officials should have learned enough about epidemiology to be considered at least proficient. Surely this should be expected of our leaders to learn about the topics that are affecting their constituents. After two years “we take the very best advice we can—from the people who are vaccine experts" is not damn well good enough.
It's bizarre to me how badly we can be failed by our governments and yet... most are still oblivious.
Disgusting. I have trouble watching anything where everyone is muzzled in face diapers to begin with. But the response "We take advice from the best people" was basically saying "We don't take advice from you little people." "It's a big club, and you ain't in it." To paraphrase George Carlin..
This is a "smoking gun" because it reveals criminal intent. Why do I say that?
Because I can assure you that it's **statistically impossible** to get these symmetrical adverse event profiles, for two of the companies shown, without foreknowledge of toxicity AND intent to experiment on the population, resulting in large-scale injury and death. It isn't negligence, by definition, nor is it incompetence, also by definition.
Now, let's see where Fuellmich and his team take this. I sure hope they put a case together and start applying pressure to the courts. I wish I were more hopeful. We must stop these heinous crimes, and bring the criminals behind them to justice.
Expert 2022 Definition: A brainwashed mentally deficient person who repeats what they are told by other experts and does what other experts advise. This condition is caused by copious consumption of MSM.
'Vaccine experts'? Every reader of this newsletter! Steve and so many others who meticulously study this! There's your 'Vaccine experts' right there! Allow me to humbly summarize the findings:
Vaccines? "Don't take them."
There you go, one-stop shopping for all your covid concerns. Humble thank you to all who did the important work (that I have done ABSOLUTELY NONE of)
Vaccine experts should not be the deciding factor on whether vaccines are necessary or not. If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. There's no way they can provide unbiased recommendation. It's not necessarily that they have ulterior motives, it's simply all they know and believe in.
Wow.... estimated he took a 98% pay cut to go into politics. This Pakistani man must really, sincerely care about conservative values a lot.
Firstly, I don’t believe in compulsory vaccination. However, just because someone is a medical consultant (anaesthetist), and has the confidence to share their view to the Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, does not mean they are well-informed about the relative merits of vaccination and acquired immunity. Nor does it mean they are correct.
The anaesthetist politely expressed a view. ‘His’ view. He didn’t cite any data to support any part of his view. Some aspects ARE supported by data, others are not.
There is now accumulating evidence that people with acquired immunity may have differing levels of protection to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. More importantly, the data indicate that those who’ve had and recovered from a COVID-19 infection still stand to benefit from getting vaccinated.
Greaney et al., Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabi9915 (2021)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369496/pdf/scitranslmed.abi9915.pdf
Vaccine-elicited antibodies have been shown to bind more broadly across the recepror-binding domain (RBD), including to the more conserved “core” regions. This broader binding makes neutralization by vaccine sera more resistant to mutations within the RBD. This helps explain the relative ineffectiveness of convalescent sera, which many people initially thought would be a successful treatment for patients with severe COVID. In fact, ‘RBD-directed neutralization by convalescent sera was greatly reduced or even eliminated by a combination of key mutations at the three major epitopes in the RBD’s receptor-binding motif, but all vaccine sera tested retained substantial neutralization against this triple mutant.’
Amanat et al. also reported that several single RBD mutations reduce binding of serum from individuals vaccinated with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine less than for serum from previously infected individuals.
medRxiv 2021.03.07.21253098 (2021).
Sajid Javid would rather lose, overnight (when deadline for mandatory vaccine for medical staff is reached), around 10% of the highly qualified medical experts than give natural immunity the same status as the vaccines. It's truly astonishing. There is zero science in that. Finally, someone has challenged him about this in public and his response was appalling, resorting to attacking the doctor personally rather than debating with facts and science. I guess natural immunity is not profitable for the government's pharma mates (and, I suspect, their family members' shareholdings in those pharma companies). I cannot think of any other possible reasons for why the government would continue to totally disregard natural immunity.
A living nightmare. No entity has the right to put someone in the position of even contemplating the option of suicide, let alone judging it as valid or considerable. For some number, as time passes, I might expect this population sector worldwide to enlarge.
Without the necessary policy changes being made -- ie, were all the liberal democracies in question currently "led" by such ignorant or otherwise evil, Wansseekonferenz-attendee-like top Health Officials as Sajid Javid, the one seen in the video "debating" past COVID-19 infectee and thus fully immunized King's Hospital ITU anesthesiologist Dr Steve James -- the human race would then appear to be on course for actual, very sizable extermination within 10 years.
Very possibly, if not already likely.
During that time-period, the possibly emergent, deliberate choice of suicide would thus naturally not only normalize; it might quite possibly be deemed as serious thought and action by clinicians, and even by other, non-medical, responsible thinkers, such as bioethicist-philosophers, as arguably coherent and rational. This would constitute a human inversion event -- humanity turned on itself -- like American cities attacked by their own invention and reign, that of passenger planes, on 9/11.
Again, on a purely semantic but existential note, this is not planned and organized genocide -- no particular ethnic group or another is being singled out by psychologically disturbed, severely wrongheaded, mad human mutants and annihilated for exactly who they are. Rather, this is organized planning, it seems, directed against the human race generally, and is thus more properly termed -- for the first and probably only time in recorded history of which I'm aware -- humanicide. On the way to such a staggeringly unimaginable end-event, the increasing prevalence of suicide can be reasonably anticipated.
It is up to us now to preempt this self-destructive event -- designed and led by such power-and-control-lusting psychopaths, wholly unrepresentative in nature and deed of those they now slow-murder, unique in known human history -- and establish a saner, more enlightened and ordered world-community made for all in proper measures affording -- better, guaranteeing -- liberty and equal justice for present and future human beings. Somehow, in some especially creative and innovative way, we will manage that.
Because, in contrast to those we seek to and must overthrow, we love our children more than we love ourselves.
The whole exchange seems staged and inauthentic to me.
I question the results of the asymptotic study when I look at what happened at Cornell University last month. An entire cohort of recently vaccinated people that are of a similar age group. Almost 100% of the campus is vaccinated yet more infections than the previous pre-vaccine era.
Best part of this is they figured out how to see if asymptomatic can happen by randomly testing people in hallways and class rooms for weeks before they started to run into asymptomatic people in December. I believe the term they used was most. On track to break 1,800 students before closing on campus class down.
Great dashboard you can go through the entire range of dates
https://covid.cornell.edu/testing/dashboard/
It's been two years now. All of these officials should have learned enough about epidemiology to be considered at least proficient. Surely this should be expected of our leaders to learn about the topics that are affecting their constituents. After two years “we take the very best advice we can—from the people who are vaccine experts" is not damn well good enough.
It's bizarre to me how badly we can be failed by our governments and yet... most are still oblivious.
Disgusting. I have trouble watching anything where everyone is muzzled in face diapers to begin with. But the response "We take advice from the best people" was basically saying "We don't take advice from you little people." "It's a big club, and you ain't in it." To paraphrase George Carlin..
Like a "slave master" talking down to a slave.
Yeah, I think vaccinologists are not experts, in anything but toxins.., and how to use them.
Steve & Everyone:
You guys gotta watch this, from Dr. Mike Yeadon.
First 40 minutes are good, but contain info most of you will already know. The "meat & beans" are from approx. minute 52 to 70 (i.e. 1 hr 10).
Minute 54 has a slide that will blow you away, esp. if you have an engineering / stats / manufacturing background:
https://brandnewtube.com/v/cAjjJK
This is a "smoking gun" because it reveals criminal intent. Why do I say that?
Because I can assure you that it's **statistically impossible** to get these symmetrical adverse event profiles, for two of the companies shown, without foreknowledge of toxicity AND intent to experiment on the population, resulting in large-scale injury and death. It isn't negligence, by definition, nor is it incompetence, also by definition.
Now, let's see where Fuellmich and his team take this. I sure hope they put a case together and start applying pressure to the courts. I wish I were more hopeful. We must stop these heinous crimes, and bring the criminals behind them to justice.
Expert 2022 Definition: A brainwashed mentally deficient person who repeats what they are told by other experts and does what other experts advise. This condition is caused by copious consumption of MSM.
Crapitalism leads to bankers as health people.
Meritocracy my ass.
'Vaccine experts'? Every reader of this newsletter! Steve and so many others who meticulously study this! There's your 'Vaccine experts' right there! Allow me to humbly summarize the findings:
Vaccines? "Don't take them."
There you go, one-stop shopping for all your covid concerns. Humble thank you to all who did the important work (that I have done ABSOLUTELY NONE of)
That’s just fucking embarrassing 🤣🤣🤣
Vaccine experts should not be the deciding factor on whether vaccines are necessary or not. If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. There's no way they can provide unbiased recommendation. It's not necessarily that they have ulterior motives, it's simply all they know and believe in.