This is a PRELIMINARY result based on over 1,500 death reports we've received so far. You are welcome to download our data yourself and analyze it and see if you agree. You may find some new things.
I don’t know if Steve reads the comments but he should read this. First, I filled out his last survey and took the time to type out my comments. When I went to submit it I got the message that something went wrong and it disappeared. I didn’t bother to do it again. Also, I just learned about 2 more vaccine injuries. The first is the death of a 73 year old man who previously had nothing wrong with him. The other is my wife’s sister,77, who has been double jabbed and double boosted and she has now got rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disease. She still thinks Fauci is a god. It really is true that you can’t fix stupid.
Geert Vanden Bossche points out the disaster the vaccines are creating may even lead to craziness this summer. The more stronger variants are becoming dominant in the population and replace the previous ones due to mass vaccinations:
please please please note the vaccines are unnecessary and harmful for everybody. There is not a shred of proof anywhere that anyone's health is in any danger from any virus including SARs 2 https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing?s=w if you find some evidence please show it to me! Thank you, Jo
Thank you, Steve. I'm glad you're using 3 outside survey firms next. What about the question of how many shots people have gotten? Are you trying to look at that, too, or are you just asking about vaccine vs. no vaccine? Also, what about which vaccine people got? For example, there may be a difference in deaths between people who got one J&J shot a year ago and nothing else vs. 4 Moderna shots.
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 1 or 2 MONTHS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
Let's look at the death data (only from covid-19) for those greater than 80 years of age, from week 3, 2022 (the fraud) onwards:
The following table has 4 columns. The first lists the period.
Column A is deaths among those vaccinated per 100,000
Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column C is Column B minus Column A; which is the number of deaths saved/lost due to the vaccines.
Period A B C (covid-19 deaths per 100,000)
week03 39 309 => the vaccines save 270 deaths per 100,000
week04 57 322 => the vaccines save 265 deaths per 100,000
week05 78 326 => the vaccines save 248 deaths per 100,000
week06 103 324 => the vaccines save 221 deaths per 100,000
week07 114 280 => the vaccines save 165 deaths per 100,000
week08 120 243 => the vaccines save 124 deaths per 100,000
week09 120 190 => the vaccines save 70 deaths per 100,000
week10 110 152 => the vaccines save 42 deaths per 100,000
week11 101 141 => the vaccines save 40 deaths per 100,000
week12 90 134 => the vaccines save 44 deaths per 100,000
week13 84 122 => the vaccines save 37 deaths per 100,000
week14............. they suddenly decided to stop publishing the data.
I WONDER WHY?
The data is from the United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
I must emphasize that the above data only records deaths due to covid-19. It does not record any deaths due to adverse reactions to the vaccines.
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide an excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
The relevant data from the reports can be found in the following PDF:
Previously, this very data was used to justify the vaccine mandates. The argument was that the vaccines are saving more than they are killing. This is no longer true. What is now true, is that; The vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
**QUESTION** Does anyone who got a COVID vaccine end up with a whole body infection or kidney problems a year later?
Something is going on with a family member and the infection has spread through lymph nodes and other parts of the body and strong antibiotics don’t seem to be working enough. They may have to remove lymph nodes they said.
My first thought: they are vaccinated.
Has anyone else heard of or experienced this with the COVID vaccines?
@Steve, your statistical analyses are fascinating. Really appreciate your deep dive into the data.
Question: In your interview with Pilot Bob Snow regarding his cardiac adverse event after the J & J injection, you mention you had written at article about J & J and how its worse than Modern and Pfizer.
Could you please reply with the title of that article, so it can be reviewed? Thanks for all you do.
Steve, from the people that I know, it seems that the vax did help with older people who contracted Delta. I have heard in my group of even some in their 40's that died of Delta unvaxxed. I think that the vax is dangerous though and if it helped someone with Delta, it may cause harm later like cancer etc...
I don’t know if Steve reads the comments but he should read this. First, I filled out his last survey and took the time to type out my comments. When I went to submit it I got the message that something went wrong and it disappeared. I didn’t bother to do it again. Also, I just learned about 2 more vaccine injuries. The first is the death of a 73 year old man who previously had nothing wrong with him. The other is my wife’s sister,77, who has been double jabbed and double boosted and she has now got rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disease. She still thinks Fauci is a god. It really is true that you can’t fix stupid.
Geert Vanden Bossche points out the disaster the vaccines are creating may even lead to craziness this summer. The more stronger variants are becoming dominant in the population and replace the previous ones due to mass vaccinations:
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/videos-and-interviews/dr-geert-vanden-bossche-ade-evolution-of-the-virus-expected-excess-deaths
please please please note the vaccines are unnecessary and harmful for everybody. There is not a shred of proof anywhere that anyone's health is in any danger from any virus including SARs 2 https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing?s=w if you find some evidence please show it to me! Thank you, Jo
Thank you, Steve. I'm glad you're using 3 outside survey firms next. What about the question of how many shots people have gotten? Are you trying to look at that, too, or are you just asking about vaccine vs. no vaccine? Also, what about which vaccine people got? For example, there may be a difference in deaths between people who got one J&J shot a year ago and nothing else vs. 4 Moderna shots.
STILL LOOKING FOR CONSTRUCTIVE COMMENT ON THIS.
PROOF THAT THE "VACCINES" INCREASE SICKNESS AND DEATH.
EVEN IN THOSE OVER EIGHTY YEARS OLD.
Read about it here:
http://www.preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 1 or 2 MONTHS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
Let's look at the death data (only from covid-19) for those greater than 80 years of age, from week 3, 2022 (the fraud) onwards:
The following table has 4 columns. The first lists the period.
Column A is deaths among those vaccinated per 100,000
Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column C is Column B minus Column A; which is the number of deaths saved/lost due to the vaccines.
Period A B C (covid-19 deaths per 100,000)
week03 39 309 => the vaccines save 270 deaths per 100,000
week04 57 322 => the vaccines save 265 deaths per 100,000
week05 78 326 => the vaccines save 248 deaths per 100,000
week06 103 324 => the vaccines save 221 deaths per 100,000
week07 114 280 => the vaccines save 165 deaths per 100,000
week08 120 243 => the vaccines save 124 deaths per 100,000
week09 120 190 => the vaccines save 70 deaths per 100,000
week10 110 152 => the vaccines save 42 deaths per 100,000
week11 101 141 => the vaccines save 40 deaths per 100,000
week12 90 134 => the vaccines save 44 deaths per 100,000
week13 84 122 => the vaccines save 37 deaths per 100,000
week14............. they suddenly decided to stop publishing the data.
I WONDER WHY?
The data is from the United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Image/Graph http://www.preearth.net/images/deaths-caused-saved-by-vaccines.png
I must emphasize that the above data only records deaths due to covid-19. It does not record any deaths due to adverse reactions to the vaccines.
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide an excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
The relevant data from the reports can be found in the following PDF:
http://www.preearth.net/pdfs/the-vaccines-are-killing-you.pdf
Previously, this very data was used to justify the vaccine mandates. The argument was that the vaccines are saving more than they are killing. This is no longer true. What is now true, is that; The vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
UK data to April 2022 show many more deaths among vaccinated for over 60, relative to unvaxxed. That is, deaths from/with covid.
**QUESTION** Does anyone who got a COVID vaccine end up with a whole body infection or kidney problems a year later?
Something is going on with a family member and the infection has spread through lymph nodes and other parts of the body and strong antibiotics don’t seem to be working enough. They may have to remove lymph nodes they said.
My first thought: they are vaccinated.
Has anyone else heard of or experienced this with the COVID vaccines?
@Steve, your statistical analyses are fascinating. Really appreciate your deep dive into the data.
Question: In your interview with Pilot Bob Snow regarding his cardiac adverse event after the J & J injection, you mention you had written at article about J & J and how its worse than Modern and Pfizer.
Could you please reply with the title of that article, so it can be reviewed? Thanks for all you do.
Check out this CNN howler: https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/20/investing/pfizer-moderna-vaccine-stocks/index.html
Steve, from the people that I know, it seems that the vax did help with older people who contracted Delta. I have heard in my group of even some in their 40's that died of Delta unvaxxed. I think that the vax is dangerous though and if it helped someone with Delta, it may cause harm later like cancer etc...
Has your team assessed the Novovax jab? Are adverse events being reported in VAERS from it?
"I used to have everything"
Top Doctor shares his life changing experience with the shot mandates.
Must hear:
https://mediaarchives.gsradio.net/rense/special/rense_051822_hr3.mp3
Fauci's wife authored this unethical report:
https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/05/18/fauci-wife-authors-paper-supporting-vaccine-pressure-campaigns/
Also check this out from Australia: https://www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-safety-report-19-05-2022
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/provisional-mortality-statistics/latest-release
Here we go again - another phony disease, another vaccine: As monkeypox cases emerge in US and Europe, Bavarian Nordic inks vaccine order - https://www.fiercepharma.com/manufacturing/bavarian-nordic-inks-vaccine-order-monkeypox-cases-crop-us-eu