At the FLCCC conference in Orlando, someone asked me to comment on the Lancet paper that claimed that vaccines saved 20M lives. Here's why I think the Lancet paper cannot be correct.
THANK YOU FOR THIS!! I have a relative who insists that the shots saved SO many lives and thus they're worth the risk. NO.
Vioxx. I wanted to know just how bad it was, and how long it took people to figure out it. No surprise that Vioxx appears to have caused MANY more deaths than they were sued for. Since most people will have heard of Vioxx, know that it killed many people (commonly cited figure is c. 58K), turns out that a strong argument can be made that it really killed 10 times that amount (everything below the link is from the article). Use this for redpilling.
"While conducting research on America’s media coverage of the Vioxx scandal, publisher of The American Conservative Ron Unz noticed some figures that seem to have escaped almost everyone else’s attention. The year Vioxx was introduced, 1999, showed the largest recent rise in American death rates. The year after Vioxx was pulled from the market, American death rates underwent a substantial and completely unexpected decline.
"We find the largest rise in American mortality rates occurred in 1999, the year Vioxx was introduced, while the largest drop occurred in 2004, the year it was withdrawn," says Unz. "Vioxx was almost entirely marketed to the elderly, and these substantial changes in the national death-rate were completely concentrated within the 65-plus population.
"The FDA studies had proven that use of Vioxx led to deaths from cardiovascular diseases such as heart attacks and strokes, and these were exactly the factors driving the changes in national mortality rates."…
"This drop corresponds to roughly 100,000 fewer deaths per year. The age-adjusted decline in death rates was considerably greater. –The Week
|The numbers suggest that Vioxx may have caused more than 500,000 premature deaths. This is so far beyond the 3,468 that were named in Merck’s class action settlement for $4.85 billion in 2007 that it boggles the mind.
and really, one can only model the absurd statement "that lives were saved IF vaxed". This can NEVER be proven to be true. Simply, one cannot turn back the clock for each person who was vaxed and before they were vaxed---to determine that. The lack of simple logic is ridiculous.
You have now totally convinced me that you truly love numbers. I know you are a EE. But I now think you like numbers -- and play them like a sport.
You dual with the Lancet. Cool. And when you point out how ridiculous their numbers are -- well that is just outstanding since 440B people don't actually exist on the planet. Ooops. Did anyone else try these numbers or just you?
But you actually got me with the title. I had no idea what NFW meant. Really -- for hours.
Then I read that Jessica Rose, an expert on mathematical models had a priceless but unprintable response toy your inquiry .
I begin to see the bigger picture a little more everyday. How we will rid ourselves of this pestilence, I cant say and I'm not convinced the so called White Hats or White Alliance are really in the rink. I use my imagination in lieu of "prayer" to picture justice for all of us. These criminals on all levels of society and in all countries must be brought to justice. Imagination and fantasy are our gifts from our Maker and we should not fail to use it. We DESIGN OUR REALITY, I cannot stress that too much.
HJi from the other end of Sussex! I read your early observation of the RULES/LAWS that were supposed to scare us all into accepting the need to 'comply', become subservient, accept oppression and prepare for Slavery. Whilst the 6 inch error was minimal in its' importance it was just one of many such rules that had to be ignored in order to remain sane and free in this suddenly screwed up world. Maybe it's my personality trait that makes me question most rules that are levelled at my FREEDOM, but I have rejected everything related to the Covid FARCE, since realising that Masking up was a signal to others that I'm easy to convince! That was around May/June of 2020, when I started to find all the questionable issues with this amazing man-made (modified by Fauci & friends) virus that seemed to replace Flu overnight??? I ordered tee-shirts with messages like 'Covid Vax KILLS' and 'Covid UNVAXXED CLUB', which I wear regularly for shopping trips. I'm just doing my bit to get others to wake up and realise that a disease with similar symptoms as Flu and 'exactly the same casualty rate as Flu' needs to b questioned. Yes, numbers of DEATHS are up but the number of DEADLY symptoms that result from accepting injected poison are well into the 100 plus. It's a WEF De-Population program to reduce the planet's carbon. Those that survive the jab, if any, will have to join the rest of us Unjabbed as SLAVES to the Elite. That's the big picture - as I see it. Mick from Hooe (Defiant)
I'm now 100% certain of DEMOCIDE. (If unfamiliar with term, look up the word. It should be the top word in '22, beginning in formus like these. Evidence now clearly points to this, so use and reuse it whenever you can.)
I can't be 100% certain of motive, ie: financial vs depop. Very hard to prove state of mind. However if "elites" at the top truly believe in dwindling planetary resources and climate change computer modeling, the latter is becoming more plausible.
When it does not stop infection or transmission and there have been about 20 million deaths due to this mRNA experimental gene therapy that was never tested properly I also doubt their figures.
How would they know if anyone had covid rather than the flu or a cold? The PCR test is not able to detect the difference and that is why the flu disappeared during the Plandemic.
When we look at the unvaccinated who did not go into the hospitals to be murdered with Remdesivir, etc. I don't see that there were too many that died from the flu, colds or covid and so how did they save any lives if none were going to die from it in without the vaccine?
Why did they have the patent for it and called it a bioweapon in 2017?
Just imagine how many Ivermectin, HCQ, D3, C, zinc and Azithromycin together would have saved.
I think Lancet has compromised itself for good in the scandal of the origin of the virus and after that with their campaign against hydroxychloroquine. In this respect, nothing they write now is of any relevance, they have shown us who is really leading this publication that people used to take as a point of reference in the field, aka big pharma. So it does not matter what they write about Covid or any other subject for that matter. To debate them means to validate them and in my opinion you should not do that.
I red an article today that caught my interest, about man's instinct to choose sides in a conflict, instinct that has been widely used by the Covid team to devise the world into antivaxxers and provaxxers. This instinct does not push us to choose a side based on arguments (logical, ethical etc), but on safety. We instinctively try to estimate who will win, who has the most power, and line up behind him for protection. That is it. Those who are remotely concerned with other aspects than safety, logics, morals etc. will try to find arguments for the truth AFTER WE HAVE CHOSEN A SIDE and yes, sometimes arguments will lead them to the other side, like it led you. Those who are educated or who have a solid spiritual life have it in them to fight instincts and to filter them through their logical or religious filter, as every religion teaches us that instincts are not our best leaders. But the rest will remain in the line chosen by their instinct and this is why they cannot be red pilled with logical arguments. To fight your instinct requires effort, and if we know anything about humankind nowadays in the consumerist society is that they do anything to avoid efforts of any kind. The sociological strategy behind Covid was very clever, like nothing seen before. It was based on studies and done by specialists.
Isn't it the team from same college which early 2020 published: "London’s Imperial College predicts millions to die from coronavirus pandemic in UK and US"? Do they have the same administrators? Financial sponsors? Nothing will change in their criminal agenda as long the same people are responsible and the same people are doing the 'science'...
Now I know thanks to you why I've been hesitant to get implants. For some reason I've been very leery never knew why. I was NEVER ok with titanium posts inserted in my jaw... I've admired the amazing dental work in other people often but never knew "implants put the immune system on RED ALERT. When you have any type of implant in the body, it triggers off and will eventually break down the immune system".
I decided back in the 80's I would have no more filings with amalgam and after a few failed root canals, opted to refuse those too in the 2000's....(they didnt last and and were ridiculously expensive). I am minus most of my molars and have had to deploy bridges or partials....
My concern now is the numbing compounds dentists use for an extraction, does it contain GO (graphene oxide)? I've avoided the vax but now wonder if the injectable novacaines are now compromised with "nano particles". I think my dentist is SINCERE and hasn't a clue of what's going on with the vax's and their destructive contents but I've got to visit my dentist again for a front tooth repair or replacement.
I very much appreciate your response to my quip and will follow your advice.
Again, they subtract the real world excess mortality from a MODEL "we estimate that 50 trillion or such wouldn've died from covid without the vaccine". But they wouldn't compare this estimate to REAL data in countries with low vaccination rates to see how good this model is.
The real question is: How is it even possible that clearly intelligent Jared Kushner still has not looked at the December 2020 EUA Memorandum and March 2021 numbers published in summer 2021? Even what Pfizer has published is incredibly incriminating.
THANK YOU FOR THIS!! I have a relative who insists that the shots saved SO many lives and thus they're worth the risk. NO.
Vioxx. I wanted to know just how bad it was, and how long it took people to figure out it. No surprise that Vioxx appears to have caused MANY more deaths than they were sued for. Since most people will have heard of Vioxx, know that it killed many people (commonly cited figure is c. 58K), turns out that a strong argument can be made that it really killed 10 times that amount (everything below the link is from the article). Use this for redpilling.
https://affiliates.legalexaminer.com/health/vioxx-killed-half-a-million-the-facts-are-grim/
"While conducting research on America’s media coverage of the Vioxx scandal, publisher of The American Conservative Ron Unz noticed some figures that seem to have escaped almost everyone else’s attention. The year Vioxx was introduced, 1999, showed the largest recent rise in American death rates. The year after Vioxx was pulled from the market, American death rates underwent a substantial and completely unexpected decline.
"We find the largest rise in American mortality rates occurred in 1999, the year Vioxx was introduced, while the largest drop occurred in 2004, the year it was withdrawn," says Unz. "Vioxx was almost entirely marketed to the elderly, and these substantial changes in the national death-rate were completely concentrated within the 65-plus population.
"The FDA studies had proven that use of Vioxx led to deaths from cardiovascular diseases such as heart attacks and strokes, and these were exactly the factors driving the changes in national mortality rates."…
"This drop corresponds to roughly 100,000 fewer deaths per year. The age-adjusted decline in death rates was considerably greater. –The Week
|The numbers suggest that Vioxx may have caused more than 500,000 premature deaths. This is so far beyond the 3,468 that were named in Merck’s class action settlement for $4.85 billion in 2007 that it boggles the mind.
No those mrna gene therapy shots didn't "save" any single life. And "Covid" didn't claim a single life.
and really, one can only model the absurd statement "that lives were saved IF vaxed". This can NEVER be proven to be true. Simply, one cannot turn back the clock for each person who was vaxed and before they were vaxed---to determine that. The lack of simple logic is ridiculous.
NFW
You have now totally convinced me that you truly love numbers. I know you are a EE. But I now think you like numbers -- and play them like a sport.
You dual with the Lancet. Cool. And when you point out how ridiculous their numbers are -- well that is just outstanding since 440B people don't actually exist on the planet. Ooops. Did anyone else try these numbers or just you?
But you actually got me with the title. I had no idea what NFW meant. Really -- for hours.
Then I read that Jessica Rose, an expert on mathematical models had a priceless but unprintable response toy your inquiry .
I begin to see the bigger picture a little more everyday. How we will rid ourselves of this pestilence, I cant say and I'm not convinced the so called White Hats or White Alliance are really in the rink. I use my imagination in lieu of "prayer" to picture justice for all of us. These criminals on all levels of society and in all countries must be brought to justice. Imagination and fantasy are our gifts from our Maker and we should not fail to use it. We DESIGN OUR REALITY, I cannot stress that too much.
I'll take the Lions +7
HJi from the other end of Sussex! I read your early observation of the RULES/LAWS that were supposed to scare us all into accepting the need to 'comply', become subservient, accept oppression and prepare for Slavery. Whilst the 6 inch error was minimal in its' importance it was just one of many such rules that had to be ignored in order to remain sane and free in this suddenly screwed up world. Maybe it's my personality trait that makes me question most rules that are levelled at my FREEDOM, but I have rejected everything related to the Covid FARCE, since realising that Masking up was a signal to others that I'm easy to convince! That was around May/June of 2020, when I started to find all the questionable issues with this amazing man-made (modified by Fauci & friends) virus that seemed to replace Flu overnight??? I ordered tee-shirts with messages like 'Covid Vax KILLS' and 'Covid UNVAXXED CLUB', which I wear regularly for shopping trips. I'm just doing my bit to get others to wake up and realise that a disease with similar symptoms as Flu and 'exactly the same casualty rate as Flu' needs to b questioned. Yes, numbers of DEATHS are up but the number of DEADLY symptoms that result from accepting injected poison are well into the 100 plus. It's a WEF De-Population program to reduce the planet's carbon. Those that survive the jab, if any, will have to join the rest of us Unjabbed as SLAVES to the Elite. That's the big picture - as I see it. Mick from Hooe (Defiant)
I'm now 100% certain of DEMOCIDE. (If unfamiliar with term, look up the word. It should be the top word in '22, beginning in formus like these. Evidence now clearly points to this, so use and reuse it whenever you can.)
I can't be 100% certain of motive, ie: financial vs depop. Very hard to prove state of mind. However if "elites" at the top truly believe in dwindling planetary resources and climate change computer modeling, the latter is becoming more plausible.
When it does not stop infection or transmission and there have been about 20 million deaths due to this mRNA experimental gene therapy that was never tested properly I also doubt their figures.
How would they know if anyone had covid rather than the flu or a cold? The PCR test is not able to detect the difference and that is why the flu disappeared during the Plandemic.
When we look at the unvaccinated who did not go into the hospitals to be murdered with Remdesivir, etc. I don't see that there were too many that died from the flu, colds or covid and so how did they save any lives if none were going to die from it in without the vaccine?
Why did they have the patent for it and called it a bioweapon in 2017?
Just imagine how many Ivermectin, HCQ, D3, C, zinc and Azithromycin together would have saved.
I think Lancet has compromised itself for good in the scandal of the origin of the virus and after that with their campaign against hydroxychloroquine. In this respect, nothing they write now is of any relevance, they have shown us who is really leading this publication that people used to take as a point of reference in the field, aka big pharma. So it does not matter what they write about Covid or any other subject for that matter. To debate them means to validate them and in my opinion you should not do that.
I red an article today that caught my interest, about man's instinct to choose sides in a conflict, instinct that has been widely used by the Covid team to devise the world into antivaxxers and provaxxers. This instinct does not push us to choose a side based on arguments (logical, ethical etc), but on safety. We instinctively try to estimate who will win, who has the most power, and line up behind him for protection. That is it. Those who are remotely concerned with other aspects than safety, logics, morals etc. will try to find arguments for the truth AFTER WE HAVE CHOSEN A SIDE and yes, sometimes arguments will lead them to the other side, like it led you. Those who are educated or who have a solid spiritual life have it in them to fight instincts and to filter them through their logical or religious filter, as every religion teaches us that instincts are not our best leaders. But the rest will remain in the line chosen by their instinct and this is why they cannot be red pilled with logical arguments. To fight your instinct requires effort, and if we know anything about humankind nowadays in the consumerist society is that they do anything to avoid efforts of any kind. The sociological strategy behind Covid was very clever, like nothing seen before. It was based on studies and done by specialists.
Isn't it the team from same college which early 2020 published: "London’s Imperial College predicts millions to die from coronavirus pandemic in UK and US"? Do they have the same administrators? Financial sponsors? Nothing will change in their criminal agenda as long the same people are responsible and the same people are doing the 'science'...
People in the medical industry/ pharma see themselves as the Saviors of Humanity. Many people see them in that role as well.
Why would you ever consider giving up that title for "Murdered more than Hitler?"
Now I know thanks to you why I've been hesitant to get implants. For some reason I've been very leery never knew why. I was NEVER ok with titanium posts inserted in my jaw... I've admired the amazing dental work in other people often but never knew "implants put the immune system on RED ALERT. When you have any type of implant in the body, it triggers off and will eventually break down the immune system".
I decided back in the 80's I would have no more filings with amalgam and after a few failed root canals, opted to refuse those too in the 2000's....(they didnt last and and were ridiculously expensive). I am minus most of my molars and have had to deploy bridges or partials....
My concern now is the numbing compounds dentists use for an extraction, does it contain GO (graphene oxide)? I've avoided the vax but now wonder if the injectable novacaines are now compromised with "nano particles". I think my dentist is SINCERE and hasn't a clue of what's going on with the vax's and their destructive contents but I've got to visit my dentist again for a front tooth repair or replacement.
I very much appreciate your response to my quip and will follow your advice.
Again, they subtract the real world excess mortality from a MODEL "we estimate that 50 trillion or such wouldn've died from covid without the vaccine". But they wouldn't compare this estimate to REAL data in countries with low vaccination rates to see how good this model is.
The real question is: How is it even possible that clearly intelligent Jared Kushner still has not looked at the December 2020 EUA Memorandum and March 2021 numbers published in summer 2021? Even what Pfizer has published is incredibly incriminating.