When parents disagree about vaccination of their kids, who should win?
Canadian Justice R. T. Bennett got it right: the courts should NOT take judicial notice that the vaccines are "safe and effective." The health authorities are stating opinions, not facts.
Check out this recent court decision from a Canadian judge. It explains why the courts should NOT take judicial notice of the opinions of health authorities (like most of them do) that the vaccines are “safe and effective.”
In this case, the parents disagree on whether their children should be vaccinated.
The father is red-pilled; the mom is blue-pilled.
All three kids are COVID-recovered.
Mom of course wants to vaccinate the kids. The Dad does not.
The judge has ruled that the opinion of the health authorities (“safe and effective”) should NOT be taken as fact because reasonable people don’t agree the health authorities are right. This is a huge shift from previous rulings which have gone along with the health authorities as the subject-matter experts. This judge isn’t buying it.
This case is now going to trial where the court will hear from experts to decide the issue.
Who will win?
In my opinion, the mom will lose. My reasoning is this:
The Pfizer trial for 12-16 year-olds enrolled just 1,000 kids. One of those kids, Maddie de Garay, is paralyzed for life, and it happened <24 hours from her shot. So the best evidence we have is 1 out of 1,000 kids ends up in a wheelchair for life.
AFAIK, there is no evidence of a healthy kid in the US dying from COVID. Ever.
There is no evidence that the COVID vaccine reduces death from COVID. It simply doesn’t exist.
There is no evidence that the COVID vaccines kill fewer than 1 child per 10M injected. That is how safe it would have to be to risk injecting a kid.
The kids are already COVID recovered. See 557: “The evidence before the court is that each of the three children had COVID-19, appeared to have had mild symptoms, and recovered from it. The uncontradicted evidence is that all three children are currently healthy and happy.” There is no benefit to additional vaccination. They already have protection which is many-fold stronger than a vaccine can ever provide.
The Cleveland Clinic study showed the more you vaccinate, the more likely you are to get COVID.
There is no precedent in medicine that natural immunity + vaccine provides stronger immunity. We are already in the 1 in 10M+ risk category for the kids since they are COVID-recovered. What absolute risk reduction does the mom think she can achieve with the incremental shot and what is her evidence of that? And how can the benefit possibly overcome the very real risk of 1 in 1,000 paralysis or the ~1 in 100,000 risk of death from the vaccine?
If this case is properly contested, mom will lose.
No child should ever be vaccinated. This is not a close call.
If you have a doctor who thinks kids should be vaccinated with the COVID vaccine, it’s time to find a new doctor.
Steve, do you know this new peer reviewed study (february 2023) which showed a positive association between vaccine doses and infant deaths???
"Introduction In 2011, we published a study that found a counterintuitive, positive correlation, r = 0.70 (p < .0001), demonstrating that among the most highly developed nations (n = 30), those that require more vaccines for their infants tend to have higher infant mortality rates (IMRs). Critics of the paper recently claimed that this finding is due to "inappropriate data exclusion," i.e., the failure to analyze the "full dataset" of all 185 nations. Objective In the present study, we examine various claims postulated by these critics and the validity of their scientific methods, and we perform several investigations to assess the reliability of our original findings. Methods The critics select 185 nations and use linear regression to report a correlation between the number of vaccine doses and IMRs. They also perform multiple linear regression analyses of the Human Development Index (HDI) vs. IMR with additional predictors and investigate IMR vs. percentage vaccination rates for eight different vaccines. We perform odds ratio, sensitivity, and replication analyses. Results The critics' reanalysis combines 185 developed and Third World nations that have varying rates of vaccination and socioeconomic disparities. Despite the presence of inherent confounding variables, a small, statistically significant positive correlation of r = 0.16 (p < .03) is reported that corroborates the positive trend in our study. Multiple linear regression analyses report high correlations between IMR and HDI, but the number of vaccine doses as an additional predictor is not statistically significant. This finding is a likely consequence of known misclassification errors in HDI. Linear regression of IMR as a function of percentage vaccination rates reports statistically significant inverse correlations for 7 of 8 vaccines. However, several anomalies in the scatter plots of the data suggest that the chosen linear model is problematic. Our odds ratio analysis conducted on the original dataset controlled for several variables. None of these variables lowered the correlation below 0.62, thus robustly confirming our findings. Our sensitivity analysis reported statistically significant positive correlations between the number of vaccine doses and IMR when we expanded our original analysis from the top 30 to the 46 nations with the best IMRs. Additionally, a replication of our original study using updated 2019 data corroborated the trend we found in our first paper (r = 0.45, p = .002). Conclusions A positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses and IMRs is detectable in the most highly developed nations but attenuated in the background noise of nations with heterogeneous socioeconomic variables that contribute to high rates of infant mortality, such as malnutrition, poverty, and substandard health care."
Goldman GS, Miller NZ. Reaffirming a Positive Correlation Between Number of Vaccine Doses and Infant Mortality Rates: A Response to Critics. Cureus. 2023 Feb 2;15(2):e34566.
I prefer the Doctors be dealt with for being wimps, taking the money, and being stupid. Fine them, put them in jail for being part of a conspiracy, being corrupt, or something.
These are people we are supposed to be able to trust. My mom was a RN and for forever and a day she would say "if you have your health you have everything". It took me years to understand what she meant. These so called Doctors have stolen our everything.