Where is their champion?
Is there any prominent authority who is pro-vax who knows the data and is willing to defend the government narrative on tape? Who is it? All the people we've ask to debate us "on camera" turn us down.
We have been trying for more than a year to get a live, “on camera” discussion with a prominent medical or public health authority who has been promoting the “safe and effective” narrative who can explain to us how we got it wrong and show us the correct analysis.
We’ve been turned down or ignored by everyone.
Even the drug companies refuse to defend their own products. They will gladly risk YOUR life by recommending THEIR product, but they will NOT accept any liability and they will NOT defend THEIR product in a scientific discussion about the data. No way. They don’t have to. They have liability protection and governments forcing their drugs into people’s arms. They have nothing to talk about.
Is Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla their champion?
Did you see the “interview” with the CEO of Pfizer where he refused to answer every question he was asked?
Is that what a discussion with their champion will be like?
Who is their champion who is not afraid of having a discussion about the data?
Here’s a Twitter request for their champion showing that there is no champion.
Even for the simple stuff, they have no explanation. Their explanation for the excess deaths in VAERS is “your arguments are invalid.”
Seriously!?!? How does he KNOW that? Why can’t they point out the error and show me the correct analysis?
What is their best estimate for the deaths caused by the vaccine? And how come everyone I ask gives me a different number? If there is a correct analysis, everyone should know the correct number.
And they should be able to clearly explain why excess deaths in the UK are at a 50 year high… because it can’t be the vaccine can it?
And they need to explain to everyone why the individual death reports worldwide for vaccinated people describe a death that is, in most cases, related to the vaccine? Just a coincidence?
How many lives have been “saved” from a COVID death by these vaccines? And why don’t they all give me the same number? The Phase 3 randomized clinical trials show the lives saved might be in the tens of thousands at best. Neil deGrasse Tyson says it is “tens of millions.” Huh?!? He should know I guess because he’s an astrophysicist!
I tried to ask him to justify that number, but he hung up the phone on me when I called him (and blocked my SMS messages). People’s lives are at stake here and Neil doesn’t want to talk about it!?!? Is that how science works Neil? You can see the entire discussion here.
They NEVER show me the CORRECT analysis! It is so frustrating. Either correct my error, or show me the CORRECT analysis.
How can they know I am wrong if they won’t show me the CORRECT analysis?!?!?
Is US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy their champion
US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy promotes a list of people who should be censored because he can’t win a debate with any of them. Is that how science works??
Murthy doesn’t know what he’s talking about. The people on his list aren’t spreading misinformation. They are spreading the truth.
The reason he needed to ask tech companies to censor these people is because he can’t win a debate with them. PROVE ME WRONG VIVEK.
Will we ever get to see a debate?
“The fact that so much energy has been expended on censoring opinions they don’t like should be all we need to know. I’ve said it before, they have abandoned evidence based science for eminence based science. It’s true because Fauci said so.”
I am very frustrated. Not a single pro-vax authority will defend the government narrative. Just one guy in Israel and he’s not a medical authority.
The “scientific authorities” believe in silencing people with dissenting views. Did you hear a single one of them protest when the US government asked the media companies to censor opposing views?
As UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad explains, that is NOT HOW SCIENCE WORKS.
And it’s not just me. They won’t debate ANYONE on the anti-vax side. NOT ANYONE.
They can’t produce their correct analysis of any of our studies, they can’t produce any success anecdotes where the all-cause mortality dropped due to the COVID vaccine, and they refuse to accept any of my six $1M million dollar bets.
Why are they not taking my money?? Doesn’t anyone in the world believe the CDC?
They are happy to risk your life by telling you to take the vaccine, but when it comes to risking their money? Well, there is no way they will do that!
Note: The lone exception is Saar Wilf, founder of Rootclaim, who is betting $500K that the vaccines reduce all-cause mortality for the vaccinated, i.e., that the lives saved by the vaccine outnumber the lives lost from the vaccine. However, he’s not considered “a prominent medical or public health authority who is pro-vax.”
SCOTUS is ultimate impartial trier of fact, and govt. will have to appeal (not Steve) if govt. loses, and it will as safety of all air traffic is in the balance. Icing on the cake is personal liability for criminal acts in deprivation of civil rights CLEARLY affects public safety, giving scotus good just cause to uphold doctrine of personal criminal liability where fraud may or has resulted in death and injury. landmark case if handled properly and with a bit of luck.
* * * *
It appears management of FDA and CDC are acting in concert to breach your civil rights of free speech, right to be heard, right to voice grievances, and other breaches, none of which are in the public interest or for the public good. Where a conspiracy exists with acts against one's civil rights amounting to two or more overt acts within a ten year period, the level of insult rises above civil infraction to violation of one's civil rights at a criminal level. Here are a few links.
The selection of counsel is key to prevailing and that cuts available , competent, committed lawyers down to a handful across the entire nation.
Here are a few links for reference for such interview of counsel. In addition, it is not the "department" or federal agency or affiliate (as in CDC) that would be listed as criminal defendants, but rather the person or persons with authority under color of law who gave the Order to block you at "server level", and including and not limited to those who have the skill sets to carry out the order, ergo manipulated the computer code to selectively block you, and, the architect / systems engineer, system wide programmer, who designed the code such that any U.S. citizen could be blocked for any reason, unlawful or not, resulting in an intentg to facilitate violation of civil rights should the perceived need arise. I see of list of defendants at least three and probable one or two times that number for each criminal complaint filed against FDA and as against CDC. IF properly structured, since such violation clearly results in condoning, enabling, facilitating unhealthy pilots of commercial airlines to put hudreds of people at risk Per Flight, these agencies are creating unsafe and very unfriendly skies.
Here are some links to start confo with attorney "candidates":
42 U.S. Code § 1985 - Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1985
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
U.S. Dept of Justice: Deprivation of rights under color of law
Judicial Council of California. Civil Jury Instructions. CACI No. 3000. Violation of Federal Civil Rights - In General - Essential Factual Elements (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
And here is where it gets INTERESTING:
Note how it gets less complicated under Title 18 241, 242 (and less expensiv as well)...
no need for a "back stop". burden of grand jury and prosecution falls on the People, not on Steve.
18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights
18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law
Because the safety of hudreds of thousands of U.S. air travelers is at stake every day of the year (24/7), if a CRIMINAL complaint is filed AGAINST NAMED INDIVIDUALS, the case is removed from civil court to Criminal Grand Jury to secretly vote for or against your criminal report:
IF you move the issue into a question of Crime against the peoples safe travel on the highway of life, instead of limiting relief to Civil Remedy just for you, then you have a much better chance of getting to SCOTUS than if you pursue Civil Litigation, and,
That strategic move delivers far reaching avenues for discovery when Human Lives, men women children, are at stake, ergo, this is not only about your civil rights - the issues raised far exceed your personal civil rights of speech and redress - they (the issues) go the heart of life liberty and safety of the entire air traffic regulation and control system.
Eric Fing-Ding lists his top covid update accounts here;
Several are criminally negligent (such as Walensky).
Now that Scott Adams is admitting he was wrong, and the Rasmussen poll shows 25% of Dems thinks someone they know died of vax injury, it's only a matter of time before their wall crumbles. But they have the military behind them; that's the problem.
and they keep adding more: