Some people have questioned me about my million dollar offers. Yes, they are TOTALLY serious. There are no tricks. The only trick is I only bet on things where I know I can't lose the offer.
Here's another. As I wrote earlier, I love your work but I'd like to respond to those who claim that you refuse to debate. A post in response would help your defenders to defuse what I'm certain are false claims. https://twitter.com/SkepticJonGuy/status/1697214384387629481
Hi Steve - love your research, reporting, and passion. A Twitter troll named Vicki Allen Crabb @crabb_vicki identifies as an epidemiologist and wants to debate me. I replied with your offer and she said you punked out? What's the story with Dr. Crabby? https://twitter.com/crabb_vicki/status/1697069626834686080
I swear I left a comment here a while back challenging you to take and beat the Bias And Deceit Analysis Support Service's (B.A.D.A.S.S.) Narrative Trap Challenge, a test that forces one to deal with the cause of the COVID-19 tyranny rather than expose the flaws found in political consequences. Why? Because to focus on consequences sustains the Fake Narrative that is choking us to death and prevents society from understanding how they've been betrayed.
I no longer see my comment and it leaves me wondering. Did Steve and his team run away from B.A.D.A.S.S. - like most who simply cannot deal with being held accountable to absolute Truth?
However, maybe I messed up posting the challenge so here it is again. This is the data hurdle you might not be able to clear, Steve, so step up and beat me down if you can.
So I had never heard of this, but if you're serious about analyzing COVID-19, I might be of some assistance. I would like not to communicate over this medium, but if there's a way that we can converse more privately, I would be happy to show you my product I constructed when I was on contract to do so in 2020.
How would you respond to Avi Bitterman's comment on Twitter: "Steve Kirsch bet me 10,000 dollars he would beat me in a debate on vaccines. After losing so badly, he tried to get me fired from my job." Is any part of this true?
The entire post is awesome. However the offer to any voting member of FDA/CDC committee is the best. They could win money by simply showing up and talking for a few hours. The fact that they do not even want to answer questions really sinks in.
You are the true hero that America and the world needs in order to realize what is really going on with this pandemic. I pray to God to protect you and your family from any harm so that you can continue doing the amazing work that you started.
Do you still have the $1 million offer for data proving NIH and WHO got it right on Fluvoxamine and Ivermectin and the $25k offer for anyone who can prove Fluvoxamine needs more data?
Is the deadline of November 19, 2021 there because you wanted it to be prior to a decision? If so explain that or why the deadline. I understand the “sooner the better” argument too. Thank you for doing what you’re doing Steve.
Your videos and interviews with Doctor who got fired for asking questions has been posted all over bitchute by content creators. This is getting out to the people with eyes to see and ears to hear. God bless everyone
Maybe you need to take out some better marketing campaign.🤗
Get a primetime, tv spot, just around thanksgiving/Christmas after dinner time, when everyone's a little too full and a lot tipsy and one of those knuckleheads will call you full of puff and wind and have a smug rant. Just make sure you record it for posterity😉🤣😂
Your $1M research grant offer is a tricky one. Anyone can publish a compelling alternative analysis that purports to show errors in the calculations. Who will judge which analysis is the truth? Will just publishing a paper be sufficient to win the bet? Will Matthew Crawford be allowed to respond? We are dealing with complex statistical calculations, and it might be impossible to definitely say who is right.
And another... Has Mr. Kirsch posted a response to any of these? If so, please post a link. Many of us hope to see a debate. https://twitter.com/SkepticJonGuy/status/1697280461196947681
Here's another. As I wrote earlier, I love your work but I'd like to respond to those who claim that you refuse to debate. A post in response would help your defenders to defuse what I'm certain are false claims. https://twitter.com/SkepticJonGuy/status/1697214384387629481
Hi Steve - love your research, reporting, and passion. A Twitter troll named Vicki Allen Crabb @crabb_vicki identifies as an epidemiologist and wants to debate me. I replied with your offer and she said you punked out? What's the story with Dr. Crabby? https://twitter.com/crabb_vicki/status/1697069626834686080
I swear I left a comment here a while back challenging you to take and beat the Bias And Deceit Analysis Support Service's (B.A.D.A.S.S.) Narrative Trap Challenge, a test that forces one to deal with the cause of the COVID-19 tyranny rather than expose the flaws found in political consequences. Why? Because to focus on consequences sustains the Fake Narrative that is choking us to death and prevents society from understanding how they've been betrayed.
I no longer see my comment and it leaves me wondering. Did Steve and his team run away from B.A.D.A.S.S. - like most who simply cannot deal with being held accountable to absolute Truth?
However, maybe I messed up posting the challenge so here it is again. This is the data hurdle you might not be able to clear, Steve, so step up and beat me down if you can.
https://www.minds.com/badass_the_reaper/blog/could-steve-kirsch-beat-the-b-a-d-a-s-s-narrative-trap-chall-1414445489989881857
So I had never heard of this, but if you're serious about analyzing COVID-19, I might be of some assistance. I would like not to communicate over this medium, but if there's a way that we can converse more privately, I would be happy to show you my product I constructed when I was on contract to do so in 2020.
Hello Steve - how are you doing? Love your help on challenging vaccine outcome on to humans.
What are your thoughts on under 6 years getting vaccinated. Many children in this category is getting sick with flu symptoms and coughing.
How would you respond to Avi Bitterman's comment on Twitter: "Steve Kirsch bet me 10,000 dollars he would beat me in a debate on vaccines. After losing so badly, he tried to get me fired from my job." Is any part of this true?
They're probably just getting a lot more money from keeping their mouth shut.
The entire post is awesome. However the offer to any voting member of FDA/CDC committee is the best. They could win money by simply showing up and talking for a few hours. The fact that they do not even want to answer questions really sinks in.
You are the true hero that America and the world needs in order to realize what is really going on with this pandemic. I pray to God to protect you and your family from any harm so that you can continue doing the amazing work that you started.
Missing you on Club House Steve. Don't stay away too long
You're our hero
Do you still have the $1 million offer for data proving NIH and WHO got it right on Fluvoxamine and Ivermectin and the $25k offer for anyone who can prove Fluvoxamine needs more data?
Is the deadline of November 19, 2021 there because you wanted it to be prior to a decision? If so explain that or why the deadline. I understand the “sooner the better” argument too. Thank you for doing what you’re doing Steve.
I bet I wouldn't turn down $1M! :-) every time these people ignore your bets, their credibility level drops.
Your videos and interviews with Doctor who got fired for asking questions has been posted all over bitchute by content creators. This is getting out to the people with eyes to see and ears to hear. God bless everyone
Maybe you need to take out some better marketing campaign.🤗
Get a primetime, tv spot, just around thanksgiving/Christmas after dinner time, when everyone's a little too full and a lot tipsy and one of those knuckleheads will call you full of puff and wind and have a smug rant. Just make sure you record it for posterity😉🤣😂
Your $1M research grant offer is a tricky one. Anyone can publish a compelling alternative analysis that purports to show errors in the calculations. Who will judge which analysis is the truth? Will just publishing a paper be sufficient to win the bet? Will Matthew Crawford be allowed to respond? We are dealing with complex statistical calculations, and it might be impossible to definitely say who is right.