Why are vaccinations required to attend school?
My local newspaper says that if kids don't have the required vaccines (or a medical exemption), they are not allowed to attend school. Can ANYONE explain the logic here?
I have some questions I was hoping someone could answer:
If the vaccines work and protect kids from disease, why isn’t an individual decision as to whether or not to get them?
If the vaccines don’t work, why are they required?
Will any health/medical authority in the country be willing to go on camera with me and defend the California law? If you are, please let me know here. If not, isn’t that telling?
How come doctors refuse to allow parents to see the all-cause risk-benefit studies for the required vaccines that compares kids with all the required vaccines with kids who have none of the vaccines over time and looks at both morbidity (such as autism rates, etc) and long-term mortality? Obviously, these studies must exist or they wouldn’t have required these vaccines. Where are they and why are we not allowed to see them?
Have any of the lawmakers who voted for this ever read Dissolving Illusions by Suzanne Humphries MD (Author), Roman Bystrianyk? Did the book make a mistake?
How come the statistics from the control group are better than those from the vaccinated group?
If the reason to vax kids is to protect those kids in school who cannot be vaccinated (medical exemption cases), then where is the study showing the overall societal risk benefit of injecting 99% of kids (who will have a negative risk benefit), to protect these at risk kids? Nobody seems to have that study. How does society ethically trade off morbidity in vaxxed kids for a morality benefit in the unvaxed?
What my neighbors on Nextdoor said
I just posted this to Nextdoor (Sep 7 at 9pm PST). I wonder how long it will stay up before Nextdoor censors it for violating community guidelines? It was gone when I checked at 11am the next morning, so it only lasted around 12 hours on Nextdoor.
Check out this response:
Basically, Dee M is looking to gaslight me and use ad hominem attacks rather than show me the scientific data. Even though this is her field, she’s unable to come up with a single paper showing an all-cause benefit for any vaccine.
This is exactly what Andrew Wakefield told me: there is simply no data to support their beliefs. They are taught in medical school that that vaccines are safe and nobody ever questions whether that assertion is actually supported by the proper studies: it is taken as gospel. When you challenge the “experts” to show you the data, they stop talking to you and run for the exit doors. This happens every time.
And the next thread is also instructive… as soon as they realize they can’t provide any study showing the all-cause benefit, they suddenly decide to stop responding:
So the burden is on me to write a paper to prove the medical community is right? This is the same person who said earlier I can’t understand any papers on the subject.
There is no need for me to write a paper; there is plenty out there already (see the next section).
Another person who disagreed with me wouldn’t talk to me either. She said we should vaccinate kids in school to protect kids who cannot be vaccinated from infection (societal benefit). This is why I asked her why we don’t require vaccination for home schooled kids since those kids could interact with other kids in the neighborhood. She told me to take a hike. That’s the way science works, I guess.
Finally, this comment is relevant:
Bottom line: Andrew Wakefield was right! And you can see now why nobody wants to debate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He’s been trying for 20 years now. No takers.
For more information
For more info on the evidence that suggests that nobody should be vaccinated, see my previous article:
I just updated the article with my conversation with epidemiologist Dee M. It's really priceless. See the Nextdoor section of the article. It shows you exactly how science works.
Perhaps you will see this study which I just recently came across. Note that I did read that the researchers objected to the redaction but for some unknown reason they were denied.
It's probably worth a longer visit down into the rabbit hole.
For me I have no medical background, heck I didn't even finish college. So this will be meaningless in polite society.
The way society appears to work is if you happen to have 37 degrees and seven thousand doctorates you will be leading the discussion at the table and whereby my voice will be muted. I did start researching schizophrenia (a family member was diagnosed after a 20 minute interview by a govt. appointed shrink) before the internet was available and that officially opened my eyes to the propaganda that big pharma was inserting into the discussion.
Onward to my sister being diagnosed with fibromyalgia, some of you may not remember how the patients were treated, much like covid vax injuries, that it was all psychosomatic or some other lame excuse. Speaking of fibromyalgia, where do you think the term was derived from? Are all diseases which are caused by poison being introduced into the human body given these fancy names ? Hmmm, makes me wonder.
Anyway with the internet now available one can find many resources and I began my journey into the abyss. This was approximately at the turn of the century when I found the probable cause being aspartame for the ills relating to my sis. That led me further down the hole of corruption and deceit by our own government as well as private business. And taught me how the actors are interchangeable between the likes of the FDA and big pharma. It also opened my eyes to credible research being denied, ostracized and even disappeared, much like what's happening in the covid discussion. I now know how the whole allopathic medicine became the only game in town. From maliciously attacking the competition, like homeopathic medicine using terms like quacks etc., to investing millions into a propaganda campaign that is alive and well today.
One has to only look at the current discussion and see the overwhelming majority of those opposed to these vaxxes when they immediately state I'm pro-vax but. That statement in itself just oozes with cult obedience.
Well for me I can honestly say I'm anti-vax and proud of it. It starts with taking personal responsibility for your health. I just turned 65, I'm not on any drugs and haven't consumed even an aspirin in over eight years. If anyone would like advice, on the road to a healthy life from an uneducated healthy 65 year old just let me know. No charge.
Michael A. Stilinovich
ps God bless