Apparently, according to the Stanford students themselves, there are more fundamental issues, such as religious and moral deficiencies, that have priority. So people will die in the meantime.
I just can't understand why no one in academia will agree to an intelligent debate over the constantly emerging data and that no MDs or faculty members will engage with their peers that have always known or changed their minds based on the data. Our "academic elites" are a disgrace to their universities, a disgrace to the scientific method and a disgrace to everything they have worked for their entire careers. They should take a step back to reflect on the reasons they won't come to terms with the data. I can assure that science and "misinformation" have zero to do with it. Thank you for highlighting our work.
The reason? The Bystander Effect. They are waiting for someone else to jump in first and I don't mean you , Steve ( Google's number one misinformation superspreader). One of the legacy news outlets or a Democrat will see this as an opportunity to 'break it first'. You have tried to appeal to their fear, now try appealing to their greed\ego\narcissism.
My daughter-in-law is connected with Stanford. She took the J & J vax. Days later came down with numbness, tingling in her extremities, brain fog. They diagnosed it as an ingredient in the vax. Put on hydroxychloroquine. Now they say it's lupus. An autoimmune disease. Coincidental? My grandson also received the shot. All of a sudden develops vitilogo, an autoimmune disease. I'm so afraid something worse will happen to all my family in CA because the vax never stops with boosting. And they're all for it. Believe in it completely.
They are above the law and they know justice will never reach them. We have to have a violent revolution and justice has to be at a guillotine. Americans are way too weak to ever rise up and force justice.
One would think that universities would be enclaves of the brightest among us.
However, it's evident that there's a definite distinction between being intelligent and being smart. Being intelligent, one can recognize the difference between the two. But if they're not smart enough, they won't know what to do about it.
I see intelligence as a capacity for mentation, mental activity. Being smart, as or more importantly, is a capability, a developed and functional utilization of the capacity. One can be intelligent, but not smart enough to know what to do about it...like these Stanford bureaucrats pushing these medical experiments on their students.
I can't help but wonder how much of a financial incentive these bureaucrats are getting from the Pharma/NIH/etc. cabal. That's not smart, but perhaps could be seen as clever. Or are just they being really stupid, doing it without any remuneration--that would be even more pathetic.
I am so tired of this issue. It seems indicative of academia to propose their philosophical ideals without looking at real world scenarios. The practically educated look for real world facts not projection models to make their decisions. When I first heard of these sustained university mandates despite the clear evidence the Vax is not working ( people still getting covid, people still going to the hospital) I thought,.....they are damaging some of the brightess minds in the world, but now I realize they are brilliant modellers, philosophers, theorists but our farmers, truckers, workers of the world are brilliant practicalists that use concrete information to make judgement of things. I am going to listen more to the practically educated. Thank you Steve for staying the course on this topic!! It is not easy to sustain this level information gathering I appreciate all your efforts.
Most considerate and caring words from a good-hearted man! I appreciate them. I think we all need, especially during these darkened days, to do our best to focus on the "good" and the lovely things of this world, or we'll suffer from severe depression. Soon, we don't know how soon, Jesus will return in His Glory to take away to heaven with him, the living saints, and those who died in Christ through ages past. And all this darkness will be finally a thing of the past. That's where I find solace in this mess.
I'm with you. Here's a little thing I'd like to toss your way, if you don't mind. There is a website called Fulcrum 7. It's mainly by and for Seventh Day Adventist Christians, but anyone can go there, naturally. Like many other sites, such as Mr. Kirsch's newsletter site, it provides for the readers to comment, but I think it requires registration. It's all beside the point I hope to make; That being that there is a regular commenter on it whose repetitious rant is aimed at the Dem's. He emphatically states that one CANNOT be a Christian, if ones vote is blue. And the more I think about that, the easier I find it to agree, since the blue platform includes abortion, and all the sexually deviant behavior, not to forget the peripheral fall-out that exists in its wake.
I'm not sure why I'm telling you this. Maybe you can spot the reason better than I. Maybe it's just to encourage you to do what you know to be right, and to let the chips fall as they might. But to try and be as gentle as you can with everyone. I have the same difficulty. My inclination is to force the lesson.
So, more Republicans afraid to do anything? Splendid! What are they threatening them with?
On top of all that cheery news. I'm reading that the CDC is covering cancer deaths now and in the UK they are hiding infant deaths. John Cambell did a piece on it.
We are living in such dark times. If someone predicted this would happen even 5 years ago they'd think you were nuts.
It should be obvious by now that trying to engage in any discussion is an exercise in futility. These people are either idiots or psychopaths, someone please tell me if there are any other options? This isn't even about science it's about middle school math and basic language comprehension. Early Covid mortality data (spring 2020) already showed an average age of death of over 80 years. Try and compute an average of 80 with young people dying. Good luck. Subsequently just read the Pfizer or Moderna EUA documents (not at all technical, easy read). The Pfizer exec was correct in mocking everyone last week with a smirk confirming that they never tested for transmission. They didn't. It's clearly spelled out in the EUA. They also don't quantify effectivity and specifically admit that the duration of (the unquantified) protection is unknown. They provide a long list of known side effects (including myocarditis) and admit there could be any number of unknow serious long term consequences because the product is in clinical trials. It's all there for everyone to read and has been since launch. I really don't know what to add other than why would anyone with a functioning brain go to Stanford or any similar institution?
The students are just as much to blame as the policy makers and public at large who support mandatory vaxing. If they enmass protest and threaten to discontinue their curriculum, surely the staff will take notice and possibly Implement change.
Sad to say, yet eventually most of the sheep will die off or become incapacitated. We will be the majority and fight to the death to maintain our freedom and liberty.
every student should seek a medical exemption and a religious exemption. So if anyone is injured there is proof that they were coerced into taking a dangerous injection.
Lack of Informed Consent if coerced after seeking exemptions and being told by Stanford professors that it was safe....
I just can't understand why no one in academia will agree to an intelligent debate over the constantly emerging data and that no MDs or faculty members will engage with their peers that have always known or changed their minds based on the data. Our "academic elites" are a disgrace to their universities, a disgrace to the scientific method and a disgrace to everything they have worked for their entire careers. They should take a step back to reflect on the reasons they won't come to terms with the data. I can assure that science and "misinformation" have zero to do with it. Thank you for highlighting our work.
The reason? The Bystander Effect. They are waiting for someone else to jump in first and I don't mean you , Steve ( Google's number one misinformation superspreader). One of the legacy news outlets or a Democrat will see this as an opportunity to 'break it first'. You have tried to appeal to their fear, now try appealing to their greed\ego\narcissism.
My daughter-in-law is connected with Stanford. She took the J & J vax. Days later came down with numbness, tingling in her extremities, brain fog. They diagnosed it as an ingredient in the vax. Put on hydroxychloroquine. Now they say it's lupus. An autoimmune disease. Coincidental? My grandson also received the shot. All of a sudden develops vitilogo, an autoimmune disease. I'm so afraid something worse will happen to all my family in CA because the vax never stops with boosting. And they're all for it. Believe in it completely.
They are above the law and they know justice will never reach them. We have to have a violent revolution and justice has to be at a guillotine. Americans are way too weak to ever rise up and force justice.
One would think that universities would be enclaves of the brightest among us.
However, it's evident that there's a definite distinction between being intelligent and being smart. Being intelligent, one can recognize the difference between the two. But if they're not smart enough, they won't know what to do about it.
I see intelligence as a capacity for mentation, mental activity. Being smart, as or more importantly, is a capability, a developed and functional utilization of the capacity. One can be intelligent, but not smart enough to know what to do about it...like these Stanford bureaucrats pushing these medical experiments on their students.
I can't help but wonder how much of a financial incentive these bureaucrats are getting from the Pharma/NIH/etc. cabal. That's not smart, but perhaps could be seen as clever. Or are just they being really stupid, doing it without any remuneration--that would be even more pathetic.
I’ll bet the hidden hand of George Soros, one of his foundations is funding the student group and the university.
People who know they are wrong, but can't admit it, won't debate you. That's a confirmation that you have your facts straight. :)
I am so tired of this issue. It seems indicative of academia to propose their philosophical ideals without looking at real world scenarios. The practically educated look for real world facts not projection models to make their decisions. When I first heard of these sustained university mandates despite the clear evidence the Vax is not working ( people still getting covid, people still going to the hospital) I thought,.....they are damaging some of the brightess minds in the world, but now I realize they are brilliant modellers, philosophers, theorists but our farmers, truckers, workers of the world are brilliant practicalists that use concrete information to make judgement of things. I am going to listen more to the practically educated. Thank you Steve for staying the course on this topic!! It is not easy to sustain this level information gathering I appreciate all your efforts.
Thank YOU, Chris!
Most considerate and caring words from a good-hearted man! I appreciate them. I think we all need, especially during these darkened days, to do our best to focus on the "good" and the lovely things of this world, or we'll suffer from severe depression. Soon, we don't know how soon, Jesus will return in His Glory to take away to heaven with him, the living saints, and those who died in Christ through ages past. And all this darkness will be finally a thing of the past. That's where I find solace in this mess.
Your brother in Christ,
Ray
Yes, Ma'am,
I'm with you. Here's a little thing I'd like to toss your way, if you don't mind. There is a website called Fulcrum 7. It's mainly by and for Seventh Day Adventist Christians, but anyone can go there, naturally. Like many other sites, such as Mr. Kirsch's newsletter site, it provides for the readers to comment, but I think it requires registration. It's all beside the point I hope to make; That being that there is a regular commenter on it whose repetitious rant is aimed at the Dem's. He emphatically states that one CANNOT be a Christian, if ones vote is blue. And the more I think about that, the easier I find it to agree, since the blue platform includes abortion, and all the sexually deviant behavior, not to forget the peripheral fall-out that exists in its wake.
I'm not sure why I'm telling you this. Maybe you can spot the reason better than I. Maybe it's just to encourage you to do what you know to be right, and to let the chips fall as they might. But to try and be as gentle as you can with everyone. I have the same difficulty. My inclination is to force the lesson.
Which is not effective in terms of teaching.
Thanks for your ear.
Ray
So, more Republicans afraid to do anything? Splendid! What are they threatening them with?
On top of all that cheery news. I'm reading that the CDC is covering cancer deaths now and in the UK they are hiding infant deaths. John Cambell did a piece on it.
We are living in such dark times. If someone predicted this would happen even 5 years ago they'd think you were nuts.
It should be obvious by now that trying to engage in any discussion is an exercise in futility. These people are either idiots or psychopaths, someone please tell me if there are any other options? This isn't even about science it's about middle school math and basic language comprehension. Early Covid mortality data (spring 2020) already showed an average age of death of over 80 years. Try and compute an average of 80 with young people dying. Good luck. Subsequently just read the Pfizer or Moderna EUA documents (not at all technical, easy read). The Pfizer exec was correct in mocking everyone last week with a smirk confirming that they never tested for transmission. They didn't. It's clearly spelled out in the EUA. They also don't quantify effectivity and specifically admit that the duration of (the unquantified) protection is unknown. They provide a long list of known side effects (including myocarditis) and admit there could be any number of unknow serious long term consequences because the product is in clinical trials. It's all there for everyone to read and has been since launch. I really don't know what to add other than why would anyone with a functioning brain go to Stanford or any similar institution?
Vaccine corporations
The students are just as much to blame as the policy makers and public at large who support mandatory vaxing. If they enmass protest and threaten to discontinue their curriculum, surely the staff will take notice and possibly Implement change.
Sad to say, yet eventually most of the sheep will die off or become incapacitated. We will be the majority and fight to the death to maintain our freedom and liberty.
every student should seek a medical exemption and a religious exemption. So if anyone is injured there is proof that they were coerced into taking a dangerous injection.
Lack of Informed Consent if coerced after seeking exemptions and being told by Stanford professors that it was safe....
Speaking of StanfordUniv., why is this a world-class university?
Is Stanford University suddenly stupid or taking donations from pharmaceuticals?