You can now register to speak for 3 min at the VRBPAC meeting on Jan 26
If you're a regular reader of my Substack, you can register to speak at the upcoming VRBPAC meeting on Jan 26. It's a virtual meeting. You will have 3 minutes to speak.
Here are the instructions:
ORAL PRESENTATIONS: Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between approximately 1:30 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time. Those individuals interested in making formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, along with their names, email addresses, and direct contact phone numbers of proposed participants, on or before 12 p.m. Eastern Time on January 18, 2023. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing session. The contact person will notify interested persons regarding their request to speak by 6 p.m. Eastern Time January 20, 2023.
The email address to use is: CBERVRBPAC@fda.hhs.gov
If you read my Substack, you are qualified.
You must apply before Jan 18, and you’ll be notified by email on Jan 20 if you got a speaking slot.
If you are selected to speak, I suggest no more than 9 slides.
If you want to mention my $1M offer has no takers and how baffling that is, you have my permission.
Here are some ideas on what to say. As far as the slide associated with each point, that is up to you but keep the slide simple (just put the words in bold on the slide) and just read the words in the rest of the point. Try to add some graphics so not just a word slide.
You have 3 minutes and you should time the points to fit within 3 minutes. Pick any points you like. It’s ok if they time you out.
It is far better to spend more time on a few important points than to try to rush through the points. If you talk too fast, they won’t listen.
Start by saying your name, org, no conflicts. Thank the committee. Then go into the points. The bold is text on the slide. the non-bold is what you read.
Pick 8 points that you feel comfy with. Coordinate with others so no duplicates.
Does censoring scientists with opposing views lead to better outcomes? Do the committee members support or oppose the CDC’s policy of conspiring with tech companies to silence legitimate scientists with opposing views?
Why can’t we talk about it? Will we ever have an open public scientific dialog between experts on both sides so we can resolve our differences? Or do you believe that the best way to achieve scientific consensus is by silencing the opposition? Will any of the committee members agree to a discussion?
Do you approve of the CDC covering up the death safety signal for two years? It is now well known that the DEATH safety signal in VAERS triggered just one month after the vaccines rolled out. The CDC has said nothing for two years. How was hiding the DEATH safety signal from the public in the best interest of the public? How many lives were saved by doing this and can we see the calculation?
Why can’t we see the societal risk-benefit analysis by age that justifies the mandates? The vaccine has been mandated in many places due to the societal benefit. I have never seen a written risk benefit analysis justifying this. Why doesn’t that exist? And why shouldn’t this be a personal decision since each person’s circumstances are different?
Why don’t we know the d-Dimer and Troponin before/after the shot? Why isn’t there a study that measures d-Dimer and troponin before and 3, 7, and 14 days after the vaccine to see if it is safe? Is there some reason people are afraid to do this study? Dr. Hoffe did this study in Canada, but his office was burned to the ground after he found that over 50% of his patients had elevated d-Dimers after the shot. I want to know what % of patients have elevated d-Dimer and Troponin after the shots. And I want to know why none of you seem to be interested in this data?
If the vaccines aren’t causing the excess deaths in VAERS, then what is? There are 15,000 excess deaths in VAERS associated with the COVID vaccines which translates into over 500,000 death using the approved CDC methodology for calculating the underreporting factor. Scott MacLachan looked at over 1,000 VAERS death records and none of the deaths were inconsistent with a vaccine death. If the vaccine didn’t cause those deaths, what did? And how come nobody can answer that question?
Why isn’t the CDC issuing guidance on autopsy methods to assess deaths caused by the vaccine? The standard autopsy methods are inadequate to assess a vaccine mediated death. Why hasn’t the CDC issued procedures for assessing whether a death is caused by the vaccine to be used on cases where the person dies within 2 weeks of a COVID vaccine?
Why is the FDA hiding autopsy results? Why is the FDA Refusing to Release Autopsy Results on People Who Died After COVID Vaccines? Does the committee know? What is the reason we are not allowed to know? You can redact the PII so we are baffled.
For more than one year, 95% of deaths in vaccinated in the last 2 weeks. If the COVID vaccine is so safe, how do you explain the funeral home director in New Zealand who recently report that 95% of the deaths he’s seeing were people who died within 2 weeks of the vaccine. That is statistically very unlikely if the vaccines are safe, isn’t it?
What is causing the strange rubbery clots that form in people’s bodies before they die? Why does the CDC refuse to even look at these clots? Some of these clots are up to 2 feet long and can be removed intact. Why hasn’t there been an investigation? The embalmer reports are absolutely devastating. In a large survey sent to over 800 funeral homes in major cities all across the U.S. and to 30 state Funeral Director/Embalmer Associations, 68% of embalmers admit to seeing these novel clots and over 25% say they are present in 40% or more of cases. I simply do not understand how you can ignore this.
Why was Maddie’s case never investigated by the FDA as promised? Maddie de Garay who was 12 years old when she got the Pfizer shot was paralyzed less than 24 hours after she got the shot. FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock promised to investigate the clinical trial fraud. Have you seen the report? Why was there no investigation? Is that how science works?
Why are the vaccinated disproportionally dying suddenly? We have a database of over 1,500 detailed death records pulled from all over the world. They show that the most common symptom of death for the vaccinated is Died Suddenly. Do you find that troubling?
Why are so many people dying suddenly? Why isn’t there an investigation? Why isn’t anyone examining the circumstances on each cause of death? We did that with over 1,500 death records and it is very clear that the COVID vaccines are associated with at least 15% of the deaths. Does anyone want to see the death records?
Why is the Death record analysis being kept secret? Why is there no transparency as to the analysis of any of the death records in VAERS as to whether the death was associated with the vaccine. All we see is the death record in VAERS. Is there a reason we can’t see the causality analysis done on any of these deaths? Is there a reason this information is being kept secret? Why won’t anyone talk about this?
Do you agree that at least 14% of the people who die within 20 days of the vaccine are killed by the vaccine? The Schwab paper showed that at least 14% of the deaths within 20 days of vaccination were associated with the vaccine. The temporal association was also consistent with this. If you don’t believe the paper, can you explain why it should be ignored? Peter Schirmacher is the senior author of the paper, it was published in a top German medical journal. Why are you ignoring this?
The case of the missing ICD10 codes. Why are there no ICD10 codes for the following conditions:
death from COVID if you are vaccinated;
COVID vaccine injury;
COVID vaccine death?
How does the CDC explain the hundreds of thousands of vaccine caused deaths? Steve Kirsch said on Fox News that the COVID vaccines have killed hundreds of thousands of Americans and Dr. Naomi Wolf independently validated these numbers. Kirsch offered his data to Fox to validate. Fox refused to look at the data. The CDC won’t look at the data either. Is that how science works?
Why take a vaccine which makes it more likely you’ll get COVID? A study of over 51,000 healthcare workers at the Cleveland Clinic found that each time you get a COVID shot, you increase your likelihood of getting COVID. Was there an error in this study? If so, what is the error? If there is not an error, then shouldn’t we halt the vaccine program immediately? This is working precisely the opposite of what we were told. The medical community is silent on this study. Is that how science works?
What explains the huge number of adverse event reports in VAERS? VAERS has recorded more adverse events for the COVID vaccines than for all other vaccines over the past 30 years combined. There are only 3 possible explanations for this: fraud, overreporting, or the vaccine is harming people in unprecedented numbers and should be stopped. There is absolutely no evidentiary basis for the first two options. So why are people not accepting the only remaining option which is that the vaccines are dangerous?
Where did myocarditis rates go down? Why can’t we find a single cardiologist in the US where the rates of myocarditis went down after the shots rolled out?
“Myocarditis is rare and mild?” The study in Switzerland showed a rate of myocarditis that is nearly 1,000X more than experts told us. They had a 2.8% rate of myocarditis. And the Schwab study showed vaccine-induced heart damage can increase excess deaths by 14% or more. That doesn’t sound rare or mild to me. [See this description of the Swiss study for the reference (“2.8 percent instead of the expected [post-COVID vaccine of] 0.0035 percent”).]
Why are there no success anecdotes? Why can’t anyone in the medical community give us the name of a single nursing home in the US where the all-cause mortality went DOWN after the shots rolled out? It seems to have gone up everywhere we’ve checked. Are we just unlucky? We ask doctors who recommend the shots for a nursing home where the shots worked, but nobody can name one. Why is that? We do have public data from New South Wales Australia and the
Death safety signal triggered 2 years ago but nobody noticed. Why didn’t the CDC notify the public of this? They know the signal was triggered, but it was only through a FOIA request this was disclosed. Why is the CDC not saying anything?
Why did the CDC hide over 770 safety signals that have triggered in VAERS? Why isn’t the CDC saying anything? Why did it require a FOIA request to get this information?
Why wasn’t the public told about the safety signal for stroke in VAERS? The CDC recently announced that the safety signal for stroke triggered in VSD. Why didn’t the let the American people know that the Stroke safety signal triggered in VAERS as well? Stroke satisfies all five Bradford Hill criteria. Why should we believe there isn’t causality here? Steve Kirsch bet $1M there is causality. Why isn’t anyone in the world taking his money?
How do you explain the fact that the vaccinated died at a higher rate than the unvaccinated in the UK for all age groups in May 2022? The UK used to break out stats by vaccination status but when the numbers got embarrassing they abruptly stopped doing that. This graph shows the vaccinated have higher all-cause mortality in every age cohort. I was wondering if you’d mind explaining how that can happen since it directly counter what we were told. These are the official UK numbers:
Can you explain the cause of a 75 to 95% d-Dimer rate after the vaccines rolled out? That is extraordinary but the rate of positive d-Dimers is consistent with what Dr. Charles Hoffe measured post-vaccine in Canada before they burned down his practice.
If the vaccine is safe and effective, why are there hundreds of thousands of people who think they were injured by the vaccine?
How do you explain so many young kids with cardiac arrests and strokes that are only happening to vaccinated kids?
Where is the analysis showing the cause of the excess deaths? Norman Fenton and Martin Neil wrote “The Devil's Advocate: An Exploratory Analysis of 2022 Excess Mortality.” It showed the vaccine was the most likely cause of the excess deaths. If he’s wrong, how come nobody can spot any errors and supply the corrected analysis?
Record-high all cause mortality. Can you explain these numbers which were pulled from public data sources showing a huge increase in deaths in 2022, similar to the huge increase in all-cause mortality in the UK. We also have death records from all over the world showing that over 9% of deaths reported in the vaccinated are attributed to the vaccine. Isn’t that an unacceptably high number? Are vaccines supposed to increase all cause mortality by 9% or more? Note that it appears that the more doses, the larger the increase in all cause mortality which would explain the figure below.
In my email to them I wrote:
I will present compelling evidence that the COVID vaccines are killing more people than they are saving and should be stopped
along with my name, email, phone.
My presentation will vary depending on whether slides are allowed. I have some very compelling slides.
If you are picked…
If you are picked and need some ideas, simply use the ideas above.
I didn't get picked to speak at the next VRBPAC meeting (no surprise), but I did submit my public comments on the FDA on the docket page (as predicted, it made me feel better): https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA-2022-N-2810-0001
"It is essential for the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee to consider all relevant factors when making decisions about future vaccine recommendations for COVID-19. The composition and schedule of primary series and boosters must be taken into account, as well as any potential adverse events associated with vaccination. The committee must also consider that the FDA has chosen to ignore safety signals regarding the COVID shots, despite serious safety concerns and disappointing efficacy. Finally, plans for an annual booster should not be made without first considering all potential risks and benefits. The FDA must be reminded that they are responsible for protecting Americans, not the pharmaceutical industry."
I received an email saying they got my comment and today I didn’t get chosen to speak but that there will be another time I can try.